Auckland Stroke Outcomes Study: Part 2: Cognition and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke

Neurology

Volumn 75, Issue 18, 2010, Pages 1608-1616

  Barker Collo, S ^a,c   Feigin, V L ^c   Parag, V ^b   Lawes, C M M ^b   Senior, H ^d  

^a Faculty of Sciences   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

^c AUCKLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (New Zealand)

^d UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COGNITIVE DEFECT; DEPRESSION; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT VARIABLE; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEMORY; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TEST; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POPULATION BASED CASE CONTROL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE; VISION;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATTENTION; COGNITION DISORDERS; EXECUTIVE FUNCTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LEARNING; LOGISTIC MODELS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; NEW ZEALAND; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RISK FACTORS; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; STROKE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78349253452     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181fb44c8     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Scott WG, Scott H. Ischaemic stroke in: an economic study.Med J 1994;107:443-446.
2. Caro JJ, Huybrechts KF, Duchesne I. Management pat-terns and costs of acute ischemic stroke: an international study. Stroke 2000;31:582-590.
3. Feigin V, Barker-Collo S. Long-term neuropsychological and functional outcomes in stroke survivors: current evi-dence and perspectives for new research. Int J Stroke 2008; 3:33-40.
4. Patel MD, Coshall C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. Cognitive impairment after stroke: clinical determinants and its associations with long-term stroke outcomes. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002;50:700-706.
5. Desmond D, Moroney JT, Paik MC, et al. Frequency and clinical determinants of dementia after ischemic stroke. Neurology 2000;54:1124-1131.
6. Desmond D, Moroney JT, Sano M, Stern Y. Incidence of dementia after ischemic stroke: results of a longitudinal study. Stroke 2002;33:2254-2260.
7. Hochstenbach J, Anderson PG, van Limbeek J, Mulder T. Is there a relation between neuropsychological variables and quality of life after stroke? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1360-1367.
8. Hochstenbach JB, den Otter R, Mulder TW. Cognitive recovery after stroke: a 2-year follow-up. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:1499-1504.
9. Nys GMS. The neuropsychology of acute stroke: charac-terisation and prognostic implications [PhD thesis]. Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands, 2005.
10. Barker-Collo SL. Depression and anxiety 3 months post stroke: prevalence and correlates. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2007;22:519-531.
11. Anderson C, Carter C, Hackett M, Feigin V, Barber A, Bonita R. Trends and disparities in stroke incidence in Auckland, during 1981 to 2003. Stroke 2005;36:2087-2093.
12. Bonita R.Aprofile ofstroke in the community. In: Baskett JJ, ed. Life After Stroke: Guidelines for Best Practice in Rehabil-itation after Stroke. Auckland: Adis International; 1996.
13. Bonita R, Solomon N, Broad JB. Prevalence ofstroke and stroke-related disability: estimates from the Auckland Stroke Studies. Stroke 1997;28:1898-1902.
14. de Craen AJ, Heeren TJ, Gussekloo J. Accuracy of the 15-item Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS-15) in a com-munity sample of the oldest old. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2003;18:63-66.
15. Delis DC, Kramer JH, Kaplan E, Ober BA. CVLT-II: Cal-ifornia Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, TX: Psycho-logical Corporation; 2000.
16. Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale: Revised. San Anto-nio, TX: Psychological Corporation; 1987.
17. Spreen O, Strauss E. A compendium of neuropsychologi-cal tests: administration, norms and commentary. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998
18. Rey A. l'Examen psychologique dans le cas d'encephalopathie traumatique.Arch Psychol 1941;28:286-340.
19. Kaplan EF, Goodglass H, Wintraub S. The Boston Nam-ing Test: Experimental Edition. Philadelphia: Lea & Fe-biger; 1983.
20. Spreen O, Benton AL. Neurosensory center comprehen-sive examination for aphasia (NCCEA). Victoria, BC: Neuropsychology Laboratory; 1977.
21. Strauss E, Sherman EMS, Spreen O. A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests: Administration, Norms, and Commentary. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006.
22. Gauthier L, DeHaut F, Joanette Y. The Bells Test: a quan-titative and qualitative test for visual neglect. Int J Clin Neuropsychol 1989;11:49-54.
23. Partington JE, Leiter RG. Partington's Pathway Test. Psy-chological Service Center Bulletin 1949;1:9-20.
24. Regard M. Cognitive Rigidity and Flexibility: A Neuropsy-chological Study. Victoria: University ofVictoria; 1981.
25. Sandford JA, Turner A. Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test Manual. Richmond, VA: Braintrain Inc.; 2000.
26. Feigin V, Carter K, Hackett M, et al. Ethnic disparities in incidence ofstroke subtypes: Auckland Regional Community Stroke Study, 2002-2003. Lancet Neurol2006;5:130-139.
27. Sudlow CL, Warlow CP. Comparable studies of the inci-dence ofstroke and its pathological types: results from an international collaboration: International Stroke Incidence Collaboration. Stroke 1997;28:491-499.
28. Feigin V, Carter K. Stroke incidence studies one step closer to the elusive gold standard? Stroke 2004;35:2041-2045.
29. Patel AT. Disability evaluation following stroke. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 2001;12:613-619.
30. Barker-Collo S, Clarkson A, Cribb A, Grogan M. The im-pact of American content on California Verbal Learning Test performance: a New Zealand illustration. Clin Neu-ropsychol 2002;16:290-299.
31. Barker-Collo S. The 60-item Boston Naming Test: cul-tural bias and possible adaptations for New Zealand. Aphasiology 2001;15:85-92.
32. Desmond DW, Moroney JT, Sano M, Stern Y. Recovery of cognitivefunctionafterstroke. Stroke 1996;27:1798-1803.
33. Sachdev PS, Brodaty H, Valenzuela MJ, et al. The neuro-psychological profile of vascular cognitive impairment in stroke and TIA patients. Neurology 2004;62:912-919.
34. Barker-Collo S, Feigin V. The impact ofneuropsychologi-cal deficits on functional stroke outcomes. Neuropsychol Rev 2006;16:53-64.
35. Jutai JW, Bhogal SK, Foley NC, Teasell RW, Speechley MR. Treatment ofvisual perceptual disorders post stroke. Topics Stroke Rehabil 2003;10:77-107.
36. Edmans JA, Webster J, Lincoln NA. Comparison of two approaches in the treatment of perceptual problems after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2000;14:230-243.
37. Bowen A, Lincoln N. Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD003586.
38. Lincoln N, Majid MJ, Weyman N. Cognitive rehabilita-tion for attention deficits following stroke. Cochrane Da-tabase Syst Rev 2000;4:CD002842.
39. Barker-Collo SL, Feigin VL, Lawes CMM, Parag V, Se-nior H, Rodgers A. Reducing attention deficits after stroke using attention process training: a randomised controlled trial. Stroke 2009;40:3293-3298.
40. Nys GMS, Van Zandvoort MJE, DeKort PLM, et al. Domain-specific cognitive recovery after first ever stroke: a follow-up study of 111 cases. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2005;11:795-806