Overcoming barriers for eLearning in universities-portfolio models for eCompetence development of faculty

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 41, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 979-991

  Schneckenberg, Dirk ^a  

^a RENNES SCHOOL OF BUSINESS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CAREER OPPORTUNITIES; COMMUNITIES OF PRACTICE; COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT; EDUCATIONAL INNOVATIONS; FACULTY DEVELOPMENT; FACULTY MEMBERS; FORMAL TRAINING; HIGHER EDUCATION; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES; INTERNATIONAL SURVEY; LEARNING TECHNOLOGY; PEER GROUPS; PORTFOLIO MODEL; TEACHING AND LEARNING; TRAINING COURSE;

CURRICULA; INNOVATION; MOTIVATION; PEER TO PEER NETWORKS; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

TEACHING;

EID: 78349251636     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.01046.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Acker, S., (2005). Overcoming Obstacles to Authentic ePortfolio Assessment. Retrieved on November 27, 2009 at.
2. Allen, I. E., &, Seaman, J., (2007). Online nation-five years of growth in online learning. Needham, MA: Sloan Consortium.
3. Barrett, H., &, Carney, J., (2005). Conflicting paradigms and competing purposes in electronic portfolio development. Retrieved August 17, 2006, from
4. Barrios B., &, Carstensen D., (Eds) (2004). Campus 2004-kommen die digitalen medien an den hochschulen in die jahre ? Münster: Waxmann.
5. Bates, A. W., (2000). Managing technological change. strategies for college and university teachers. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
6. Becher, T., &, Trowler, P. R., (2001). Academic tribes and territories. Intellectual enquiry and the culture of disciplines. Buckingham: Open University Press.
7. Boezerooij, P., (2006). E-learning strategies of higher education institutions. (Thesis, PhD, University of Twente).
8. Bremer C., &, Kohl K., (Eds) (2004). E-Learning-Strategien und E-Learning-kompetenzen an Hochschulen. Bielefeld: W. Bertelsmann Verlag.
9. Carraher, D. W., &, Schliemann, A. D., (2002). The transfer dilemma. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11, 1, 1-24.
10. Chang, C.-C., (2002). A study on the evaluation and effectiveness analysis of web-based learning portfolio (WBLP). British Journal of Educational Technology, 32, 4, 435-458.
11. Collis, B., &, Van Der Wende, M., (2002). Models of technology and change in higher education. Enschede: University of Twente.
12. Cook, R. G., Ley, K., Crawford, C., &, Warner, A., (2009). Motivators and inhibitors for university faculty in distance and e-learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40, 1, 149-163.
13. Duderstadt, J., Atkins, D., &, Van Houweling, D., (2003). The development of institutional strategies. Educause Review, 38, 3, 48-58.
14. Ely, D. P., (1999). Conditions that facilitate the implementation of educational technology innovation. Educational Technology, 39, 6, 23-27.
15. Enders, J., (2002). Governing the Academic Commons: About blurring boundaries, blistering organisations, and growing demands, Inaugural lecture. In The CHEPS Inaugurals 2002 (pp. 69-105). Enschede: University of Twente.
16. Erpenbeck, J., &, Heyse, V., (1999). Die Kompetenzbiographie- Strategien der Kompetenzentwicklung durch selbstorganisiertes Lernen und multimediale Kommunikation. Münster: Waxmann.
17. Euler, D., (2004). Gestaltung der Kompetenzentwicklung von E-Learning-Promotoren. In, D. Euler, &, S. Seufert, (Eds), E-Learning in Hochschulen und Bildungszentren (pp. 169-187). München: Oldenbourg.
18. Euler, D., &, Seufert, S., (2004). Nachhaltigkeit von eLearning-Innovationen-Ergebnisse einer Delphi-Studie (Swiss Centre for innovations in learning report 2). St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.
19. Hagner, P. R., &, Schneebeck, C. A., (2001). Engaging the faculty. In, C. A. Barone, &, P. R. Hagner, (Eds), Technology enhanced teaching and learning: leading and supporting the transformation on your campus (pp. 1-13). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Johnson, D. F., (2003). Toward a philosophy of online education. In, D. G. Brown, (Ed.), Developing faculty to use technology-programs and strategies to enhance teaching (pp. 9-12). Bolton: Anker Publishing.
21. Kerres, M., &, Voß, B., (2006). Kompetenzentwicklung für E-learning: Support-Dienstleistungen lernförderlich gestalten. In, Harald Gapski, (Hrsg.), Entwicklung von Medienkompetenz im Hochschulbereich (pp. 35-55). Schriftenreihe Medienkompetenz des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. Düsseldorf: Kopaed Verlag.
22. Kerres, M., Euler, D, Seufert, S., Hasanbegovic, J., &, Voss, B., (2005). Lehrkompetenz für eLearning-innovationen in der hochschule (Swiss Centre for innovations in learning report 6). St. Gallen: University of St. Gallen.
23. Latchem, C., Jung, I., Aoki, K., &, Ozkul, A. E., (2007). The tortoise and the hare enigma in e-transformation in Japanese and Korean higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 4, 610-630.
24. Lave, J., (1988). Cognition in practice: mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Leslie, D. W., (2002). Resolving the dispute-teaching is academe's core value. The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 1, 49-73.
26. Lewin, K., &, Graumann, C. F., (1982). Kurt-Lewin-werkausgabe Vol. 4. Bern: Huber.
27. Light, D., (1974). The structure of the academic professions. Sociology of Education, 47, 1, 2-28.
28. Love, D., McKean, G., &, Gathercoal, P., (2004). Portfolios to webfolios and beyond: levels of maturation. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 27, 2, 1-14.
29. Mayring, P., &, Gläser-Zikuda, M., (2003). Die Praxis der Qualitativen Inhaltsanalyse. Weinheim und Basel: Beltz.
30. McClelland, D. C., (1973). Testing for competence rather than for 'intelligence. American Psychologist, 28, 1-14.
31. North, K., &, Reinhardt, K., (2003). Transparency and transfer of individual competencies-a concept of integrative competence management. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9, 12, 1372-1381.
32. Open and Distance Learning Liaison Committee (2004). Distance Learning and eLearning in European Policy and Practice: The Vision and the Reality. Policy Paper of the European ODL Liaison Committee. Retrieved September 22, 2006, from.
33. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2005). E-learning in tertiary education: where do we stand? Paris: OECD.
34. Phelps, R., Hase, S., &, Ellis, A., (2005). Competency, capability, complexity and computers: exploring a new model for conceptualising end-user computer education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36, 1, 67-84.
35. Proctor, R. W., &, Dutta, A., (1995). Skill acquisition and human performance. London: Sage.
36. Prosser, M., &, Trigwell, K., (1999). Understanding learning and teaching: the experience in higher education. Buckingham: Open University Press.
37. Rogers, E. M., (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th Ed.). New York: Free Press.
38. Saks, A. M., (1997). Transfer of training and self-efficacy: what is the dilemma ? Applied Psychology, 46, 4, 365-370.
39. Salmon, G., (2004). E-moderating: the key to teaching and learning online (2nd Ed.). London: Taylor & Francis.
40. Savin-Baden, M., (2007). Challenging models and perspectives of problem-based learning. In, E. De Graaff, &, A. Kolmos, (Eds), Management of change: implementation of problem-based and project-based learning in engineering (pp. 9-30). Rotterdam: SENSE Publisher.
41. Schneckenberg, D., (2008). Educating tomorrow's knowledge workers. Delft: Eburon Academic Publishers.
42. Schneckenberg, D., (2009). Understanding the real barriers to technology-enhanced innovation in higher education. Educational Research, 51, 4, 411-424.
43. Stefani, L., (2008). The educational potential of e-portfolios. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 5, 962-963.
44. Stefani, L., Mason, R., &, Pegler, C., (2007). The educational potential of e-Portfolios-supporting personal development and reflective learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
45. Van der Blij, M., (2002). Van competenties naar proeven van bekwaamheid, een orientatie. Enschede: University of Twente.
46. Vom Brocke, J., (2005). Organisationsgestaltung im e-Learning-Konzeption und Anwendung für die integrierte Prozessgestaltung an Groß universitäten. In, K. P. Jantke, K. P. Fähnrich, &, W. S. Wittig, (Eds), Marktplatz internet: von e-learning bis e-payment (pp. 157-164). Bonn: Gesellschaft für Informatik.
47. Weick, K. E., (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1, 1-19.
48. Weinert, F. E., (1999). Definition and selection of competencies-concepts of competence. Munich: Max Planck Institute for Psychological Research.
49. Weinert, F. E., (2001). Concept of competence: a conceptual clarification. In, D. S. Rychen, &, L. H. Salganik, (Eds), Defining and selecting key competencies (pp. 45-66). Seattle: Hogrefe & Huber.
50. Wengraf, T., (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publications.
51. Winterton, J., Delamare Le Deist, F., &, Stringfellow, E., (2005). Typology of knowledge, skills and competences: clarification of the concept and prototype. Toulouse: Toulouse Business School, Centre for European Research on Employment and Human Resources.
52. Yin, R. K., (2003). Case study research-design and methods (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA, London: Sage Publications.
53. Zemsky, R., &, Massy, W. F., (2004). Thwarted innovation: what happened to e-learning and why? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, The Learning Alliance.