Optical coherence tomography as a non-invasive imaging technique for preinvasive and invasive neoplasia of the uterine cervix

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 624-629

  Gallwas, J ^a   Turk, L ^a   Friese, K ^a   Dannecker, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

CIN; colposcopy; intraepithelial cervical neoplasia; OCT; optical coherence tomography

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COLPOSCOPY; EVALUATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY; PRECANCER; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CERVICAL INTRAEPITHELIAL NEOPLASIA; COLPOSCOPY; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PRECANCEROUS CONDITIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TOMOGRAPHY, OPTICAL COHERENCE; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78349250621     PISSN: 09607692     EISSN: 14690705     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/uog.7656     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Turchin IV, Sergeeva EA, Dolin LS, Kamensky VA, Shakhova NM, Richards-Kortum R,. Novel algorithm of processing optical coherence tomography images for differentiation of biological tissue pathologies. J Biomed Opt 2005; 10: 064024.
2. Pitris C, Goodman A, Boppart SA, Libus JJ, Fujimoto JG, Brezinski ME,. High-resolution imaging of gynecologic neoplasms using optical coherence tomography. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 135 - 139.
3. Zysk AM, Nguyen FT, Oldenburg AL, Marks DL, Boppart SA,. Optical coherence tomography: a review of clinical development from bench to bedside. J Biomed Opt 2007; 12: 051403.
4. Fujimoto JG, Pitris C, Boppart SA, Brezinski ME,. Optical coherence tomography: an emerging technology for biomedical imaging and optical biopsy. Neoplasia 2000; 2: 9 - 25.
5. Drexler W,. Cellular and functional optical coherence tomography of the human retina: the Cogan lecture. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2007; 48: 5339 - 5351.
6. Mirza RG, Johnson MW, Jampol LM,. Optical coherence tomography use in evaluation of the vitreoretinal interface: a review. Surv Ophthalmol 2007; 52: 397 - 421.
7. Johansson A, Kromer K, Sroka R, Stepp H,. Clinical optical diagnostics - status and perspectives. Med Laser Appl 2006; 23: 155 - 174.
8. Crow P, Stone N, Kendall CA, Persad RA, Wright MP,. Optical diagnostics in urology: current applications and future prospects. BJU Int 2003; 92: 400 - 407.
9. Zuluaga AF, Follen M, Boiko I, Malpica A, Richards-Kortum R,. Optical coherence tomography: a pilot study of a new imaging technique for non-invasive examination of cervical tissue. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2005; 193: 83 - 88.
10. Escobar PF, Rojas-Espaillat L, Tisci S, Enerson C, Brainard J, Smith J, Tresser NJ, Feldchtein FI, Rojas LB, Belinson JL,. Optical coherence tomography as a diagnostic aid to visual inspection and colposcopy for preinvasive and invasive cancer of the uterine cervix. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2006; 16: 1815 - 1822.
11. Escobar PF, Belinson JL, White A, Shakhova NM, Feldchtein FI, Kareta MV, Gladkova ND,. Diagnostic efficacy of optical coherence tomography in the management of preinvasive and invasive cancer of uterine cervix and vulva. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2004; 14: 470 - 474.
12. Cohen J,. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 1960; 20: 37 - 46.
13. Malpica A, Matisic JP, Niekirk DV, Crum CP, Staerkel GA, Yamal JM, Guillaud MH, Cox DD, Atkinson EN, Adler-Storthz K, Poulin NM, Macaulay CA, Follen M,. Kappa statistics to measure interrater and intrarater agreement for 1790 cervical biopsy specimens among twelve pathologists: qualitative histopathologic analysis and methodologic issues. Gynecol Oncol 2005; 99 (3 Suppl 1): S38 - S52.
14. Lindeque BG,. Management of cervical premalignant lesions. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 19: 545 - 561.
15. NHS Cervical Screening Programme. In Guidelines for clinical practice and programme management, Duncan ID, (ed.). HMSO: London, 1997.
16. ACOG Executive Board, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada; Central American Federation of Associations and Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Gynaecologic Oncologists of Canada; Society of Canadian Colposcopists; Society of Gynecologic Oncologists; Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. ACOG Statement of Policy. Cervical cancer prevention in low-resource settings. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103: 607 - 609.
17. Sawaya GF, Brown AD, Washington AE, Garber AM,. Clinical practice. Current approaches to cervical cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2001; 344: 1603 - 1607.
18. Bazant-Hegemark F, Edey K, Swingler GR, Read MD, Stone N,. Review: optical micrometer resolution scanning for non-invasive grading of precancer in the human uterine cervix. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2008; 7: 483 - 496.
19. Hornung R, Pham TH, Keefe KA, Berns MW, Tadir Y, Tromberg BJ,. Quantitative near-infrared spectroscopy of cervical dysplasia in vivo. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 2908 - 2916.
20. Chang VT, Cartwright PS, Bean SM, Palmer GM, Bentley RC, Ramanujam N,. Quantitative physiology of the precancerous cervix in vivo through optical spectroscopy. Neoplasia 2009; 11: 325 - 332.
21. Lee SW, Yoo JY, Kang JH, Kang MS, Jung SH, Chong Y, Cha DS, Han KH, Kim BM,. Optical diagnosis of cervical intraepithelial neoplasm (CIN) using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography. Opt Express 2008; 16: 2709 - 2719.
22. Heatley MK,. How should we grade CIN? Histopathology 2002; 40: 377 - 390.
23. Kalof AN, Cooper K,. Our approach to squamous intraepithelial lesions of the uterine cervix. J Clin Pathol 2007; 60: 449 - 455.
24. Schiffman M, Castle PE, Jeronimo J, Rodriguez AC, Wacholder S,. Human papillomavirus and cervical cancer. Lancet 2007; 370: 890 - 907.
25. Dalla Palma P, Giorgi Rossi P, Collina G, Buccoliero AM, Ghiringhello B, Gilioli E, Onnis GL, Aldovini D, Galanti G, Casadei G, Aldi M, Gomes VV, Giubilato P, Ronco G,; NTCC Pathology Group. The reproducibility of CIN diagnoses among different pathologists: data from histology reviews from a multicenter randomized study. Am J Clin Pathol 2009; 132: 125 - 132.
26. Regauer S, Reich O,. CK17 and p16 expression patterns distinguish (atypical) immature squamous metaplasia from high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN III). Histopathology 2007; 50: 629 - 635.
27. McCluggage WG, Walsh MY, Thornton CM, Hamilton PW, Date A, Caughley LM, Bharucha H,. Inter- and intra-observer variation in the histopathological reporting of cervical squamous intraepithelial lesions using a modified Bethesda grading system. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1998; 105: 206 - 210.