Use of ultrasound to provide overall information on facial fillers and surrounding tissue

Dermatologic Surgery

Volumn 36, Issue SUPPL. 3, 2010, Pages 1843-1851

  Schelke, Leonie W ^a   Van Den Elzen, Helga J ^b   Erkamp, P P M ^c   Neumann, H A M ^d  

^a Medisch Laser Centrum   (Netherlands)

^b Elzen Kliniek   (Netherlands)

^c Kliniek DeLairesse   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYALURONIC ACID; HYDROXYAPATITE; POLY(METHYL METHACRYLATE); POLYLACTIC ACID; PREDNISONE; SILICONE OIL;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL REACTION; CLINICAL EVALUATION; GRANULOMA; HUMAN; INJECTION SITE IRRITATION; INJECTION SITE SWELLING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NASOLABIAL FOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SKIN DEFECT; TISSUE REACTION; ULTRASOUND;

FACE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FOREIGN-BODY MIGRATION; FOREIGN-BODY REACTION; HUMANS; OUTPATIENTS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHYTIDOPLASTY; RISK FACTORS; SKIN AGING;

EID: 78349247842     PISSN: 10760512     EISSN: 15244725     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2010.01740.x     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Donofrio L, Weinkle S., The third dimension in facial rejuvenation: a review. J Cosmet Dermatol 2006; 5: 277-83.
2. Bucky LP, Kanchwala SK., The role of autologous fat and alternative fillers in the aging skin. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (6 Suppl): 89S-97S.
3. Brandt FS, Cazzaniga A., Hyaluronic acid gel fillers in the management of facial aging. Clin Interv Aging 2008; 3: 153-9.
4. Vleggaar D, Fitzgerald R., Dermatological implications of skeletal aging: a focus on supraperiosteal volumization for perioral rejuvenation. J Drugs Dermatol 2008; 7: 209-20.
5. Tezel A, Fredrickson GH., The science of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. J Cosmet Laser Ther 2008; 10: 35-42.
6. Kablik J, Monheit GD, Yu L, et al,. Comparative physical properties of hyaluronic acid dermal fillers. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35 (Suppl 1): 302-12.
7. Nicolau PJ., Long-lasting and permanent fillers: biomaterial influence over host tissue response. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 2271-86.
8. Falcone SJ, Berg RA., Temporary polysaccharide dermal fillers: a model for persistence based on physical properties. Dermatol Surg 2009; 35: 1238-43.
9. Schmid-Wendtner MH, Dill-Müller D., Ultrasound technology in dermatology. Semin Cutan Med Surg 2008; 27: 44-51.
10. Grima PF, Chiavaroli R, Grima P., Ultrasonic assessment of lipodystrophy in HIV-1-infected patients. Radiol Med 2009; 114: 114-51.
11. Young SR, Bolton PA, Downie J., Use of high-frequency ultrasound in the assessment of injectable dermal fillers. Skin Res Technol 2008; 14: 320-3.
12. Pinsky MA, Thomas JA, Juverderm vs Zyplast Nasolabial Fold Study Group, et al. Juvéderm injectable gel: a multicentre, double-blind, randomized study of safety and effectiveness. Aesthet Surg J 2008; 28: 17-23.
13. Smith S, Busso M, McClaren M, Bass LS., A randomized, bilateral, prospective comparison of calcium hydroxyapatite microspheres versus human-based collagen for the correction of nasolabial folds. Dermatol Surg 2007; 33 (Suppl2): S112-21, discussion S121.
14. Dadzie OE, Mahalingam M, Parada M, et al,. Adverse cutaneous reactions to soft tissue fillers-a review of the histological features. J Cutan Pathol 2008; 35: 536-48.