Enabling reputation interoperability through semantic technologies

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Alnemr, Rehab ^a   Paschke, Adrian ^b   Meinel, Christoph ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF POTSDAM   (Germany)

^b FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

ontologies; reputation; reputation object; rule responder; software

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX OBJECTS; DIFFERENT DOMAINS; E-MARKET; IN-FIELD; KNOWLEDGE-SHARING; OBJECT MODEL; ONTOLOGY-BASED; REPUTATION; REPUTATION OBJECT; REPUTATION SYSTEMS; RULE BASED; RULE RESPONDER; SEMANTIC DESIGN; SEMANTIC MODEL; SEMANTIC TECHNOLOGIES; SEMANTIC WEB TECHNOLOGY; SOFTWARE;

INTEROPERABILITY; ONTOLOGY;

SEMANTIC WEB;

EID: 78249265334     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1839707.1839723     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. eRep project: Social knowledge for e-governace. http://megatron.iiia. csic.es/eRep/?q=node/93.
2. Rdf vocabulary description language. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/.
3. R. Alnemr, J. Bross, and C. Meinel. Constructing a context-aware service-oriented reputation model using attention allocation points. Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Service Computing (SCC 2009), pages 451-457, 2009.
4. R. Alnemr and C. Meinel. Getting more from reputation systems: A context-aware reputation framework based on trust centers and agent lists. Computing in the Global Information Technology, International Multi-Conference, 2008.
5. R. Alnemr, M. Quasthoff, and C. Meinel. Taking Trust Management to the Next Level. Handbook of Research on P2P and Grid Systems for Service-Oriented Computing: Models, Methodologies and Applications, pp. 796-816, 2009.
6. P. Avegliano and J. S. Sichman. Using the RePart simulator to analyze different reputation-based partnership formation strategies within a marketplace scenario. Trust in Agent Societies, pages 226-243, 2008.
7. T. Berners-Lee, J. Hendler, and O. Lassila. The semantic web. Scientific American Magazine, May 17, 2001.
8. D. Bianculli, W. Binder, L. Drago, and C. Ghezzi. Transparent Reputation Management for Composite Web Services. In ICWS '08: Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE International Conference on Web Services, pages 621-628, Washington, DC, USA, 2008. IEEE Computer Society.
9. D. Booth, H. Haas, F. McCabe, E. Newcomer, M. Champion, C. Ferris, and D. Orchard. Web services architecture. W3C recommendation, W3C, 2004.
10. Casare and Sichman. Towards a functional ontology of reputation. Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems, 2005.
11. J. Chandler, K. El-Khatib, M. Benyoucef, G. Bochmann, and C. Adams. Legal Challenges of Online Reputation Systems. Chapter in Trust in E-Services, pp.84-111, 2007.
12. N. Drummond, A. Rector, R. Stevens, G. Moulton, M. Horridge, H. Wang, and J. Sedenberg. Putting owl in order: Patterns for sequences in owl. In OWL Experiences and Directions (OWLEd 2006), Athens Georgia, 2006.
13. ENISA. ENISA position paper no. 2 reputation-based systems: a security analysis. October 2007.
14. N. et al. SOARI: A service oriented architecture to support agent reputation models interoperability. Trust in Agent Societies: 11th International Workshop, TRUST 2008, Estoril, Portugal, 2008.
15. T. Eymann, S. König, and R. Matros. A framework for trust and reputation in grid environments. Journal of Grid Computing, 6:225-237, 2008.
16. Y. Gil and V. Ratnakar. Trusting information sources one citizen at a time. Proceedings of the First International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC), Sardinia, Italy, 2002.
17. J. Golbeck, B. Parsia, and J. Hendler. Trust networks on the semantic web. Proceedings of Cooperative Intelligent Agents,Helsinki, Finland, 2003.
18. T. Grandison. Trust management tools, 2007.
19. I. U. Haq, R. Alnemr, A. Paschke, E. Schikuta, H. Boley, and C. Meinel. Distributed trust management for validating SLA choreographies. Proc. Workshop SLAs in Grids (in conjunction with Grid'09), CoreGRID Springer series, Banff, Canada, October 2009.
20. B. K., C. Chandrasekhar, and R. Viana. Portable reputations with egosphere, 2004.
21. S. Kamvar, D. Mario, T. Schlosser, and H. Garcia-Molina. The eigentrust algorithm for reputation management in P2P networks. Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, 2003.
22. Malik and Bouguettaya. Rateweb: Reputation assessment for trust establishment among web services. The VLDB Journal, pages 885-911, 2009.
23. E. Maximilien and M. Singh. Toward autonomic web services trust and selection. Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Service oriented computing, New York, NY, USA, 2004.
24. A. Paschke. A typed hybrid description logic programming language with polymorphic order-sorted DL-Typed unification for semantic web type systems. In OWLED, 2006.
25. A. Paschke, H. Boley, A. Kozlenkov, and B. L. Craig. Rule responder: RuleML-based agents for distributed collaboration on the pragmatic web. In ICPW, pages 17-28, 2007.
26. M. Quasthoff, H. Sack, and C. Meinel. Can software developers use linked data vocabulary? Proceeding of I-Semantics'09, Graz, 2009.
27. A. Rahman and Hailes. Supporting trust in virtual communities. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, 6:6007, 2000.
28. M. Richardson, R. Agrawal, and P. Domingos. Trust management for the semantic web,. Proceedings of the Second International Semantic Web Conference. Sanibel Island, Florida, 2003.
29. J. Sabater, M. Paolucci, , and R. Conte. Repage: Reputation and image among limited autonomous partners. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 9(2), 2006.
30. J. Sabater and C. Sierra. Review on computational trust and reputation models. Artificial Intellegence Rev., 24:33-60, 2005.
31. W. Sherchan, S. W. Loke, and S. Krishnaswamy. A fuzzy model for reasoning about reputation in web services. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM symposium on Applied computing, 2006.
32. G. Zacharia. Trust management through reputation mechanisms. Applied AI, 14:881-907, 2000.