Mind control? Creating illusory intentions through a phony brain-computer interface

Consciousness and Cognition

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1007-1012

  Lynn, Margaret T ^a   Berger, Christopher C ^a   Riddle, Travis A ^b   Morsella, Ezequiel ^a,c  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Action production; Authorship processing; Ideomotor processing; Perception and action; Sense of agency; Volition; Voluntary action

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IDEOMOTOR THEORY; ILLUSION; NORMAL HUMAN; PREDICTION; RATING SCALE; THEORY;

AWARENESS; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; INTENTION; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOLITION;

EID: 78149500483     PISSN: 10538100     EISSN: 10902376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2010.05.007     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Banks W.P., Isham E.A. We infer rather than perceive the moment we decided to act. Psychological Science 2009, 20:17-21.
2. Bargh J.A., Chartrand T.L. A practical guide to priming and automaticity research. Handbook of research methods in social psychology 2000, 253-285. Cambridge University Press, New York. H. Reis, C. Judd (Eds.).
3. Berti A., Pia L. Understanding motor awareness through normal and pathological behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2006, 15:245-250.
4. Block N. Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2007, 30:481-548.
5. Botvinick M., Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature 1998, 391:756.
6. Carpenter W.B. Principles of mental physiology 1874, Appleton, New York.
7. Cohen J.D., MacWhinney B., Flatt M., Provost J. PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers 1993, 25:257-271.
8. Corallo G., Sackur J., Dehaene S., Sigman M. Limits on introspection: Distorted subjective time during the dual-task bottleneck. Psychological Science 2008, 19:1110-1117.
9. Fourneret P., Jeannerod M. Limited conscious monitoring of motor performance in normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36:1133-1140.
10. Frith C.D., Blakemore S.J., Wolpert D.M. Abnormalities in the awareness and control of action. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 2000, 355:1771-1788.
11. Gray J.A. The contents of consciousness: A neuropsychological conjecture. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 1995, 18:659-676.
12. Gray J.A. Consciousness: Creeping up on the hard problem 2004, Oxford University Press, New York.
13. Grossberg S. The link between brain learning, attention, and consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition 1999, 8:1-44.
14. Harleß E. Der Apparat des Willens. Zeitshrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik 1861, 38:499-507.
15. Hommel B. Action control according to TEC (theory of event coding). Psychological Research 2009, 73:512-526.
16. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. The theory of event coding: A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2001, 24:849-937.
17. James W. Principles of psychology 1890, Holt, New York.
18. Jeannerod M. Motor cognition: What action tells the self 2006, Oxford University Press, New York.
19. Klein D.B. A history of scientific psychology: Its origins and philosophical backgrounds 1970, Basic Books, New York.
20. Knuf L., Aschersleben G., Prinz W. An analysis of ideomotor action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2001, 130:779-798.
21. Libet B. Mind time: The temporal factor in consciousness 2004, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
22. Lotze R.H. Medizinische Psychologie oder Physiologie der Seele 1852, Weidmann'sche Buchhandlung, Leipzig.
23. Melcher T., Weidema M., Eenshuistra R.M., Hommel B., Gruber O. The neural substrate of the ideomotor principle: An event-related fMRI analysis. NeuroImage 2008, 39:1274-1288.
24. Rosenbaum, D. A. (2002). Motor control. In H. Pashler (Series Ed.) & S. Yantis (Vol. Ed.), Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology: Vol. 1. Sensation and perception (3rd ed., pp. 315-339). New York: Wiley.
25. Rossetti Y. Implicit perception in action: Short-lived motor representation of space. Finding consciousness in the brain: A neurocognitive approach 2001, 133-181. John Benjamins Publishing, Netherlands. P.G. Grossenbacher (Ed.).
26. Scheerer E. Muscle sense and innervation feelings: A chapter in the history of perception and action. Perspectives of Perception and Action 1987, 171-194. Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. H. Heuer, A.F. Sanders (Eds.).
27. Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W. Perceptual resonance. Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:349-355.
28. Simon J.R., Hinrichs J.V., Craft J.L. Auditory S-R compatibility: Reaction time as a function of ear-hand correspondence and ear-response-location correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1970, 86:97-102.
29. Tversky A., Kahneman D. Judgments under uncertainty. Science 1974, 185:1124-1131.
30. Wegner D.M. The illusion of conscious will 2002, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
31. Wegner D.M. The mind's best trick: How we experience conscious will. Trends in Cognitive Science 2003, 7:65-69.
32. Wegner D.M., Wheatley T.P. Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist 1999, 54:480-492.
33. Wohlschläger A. Visual motion priming by invisible actions. Vision Research 2000, 40:925-930.