Effect of collagen I and fibronectin on the adhesion, elasticity and cytoskeletal organization of prostate cancer cells

Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications

Volumn 402, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 361-366

  Docheva, Denitsa ^a   Padula, Daniela ^a,b,c   Schieker, Matthias ^a   Clausen Schaumann, Hauke ^b,c  

^a LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b MUNICH UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Actin cytoskeleton; Atomic force microscopy (AFM); Cell adhesion; Collagen I; Fibronectin; Prostate cancer cells; Young's Modulus

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; FIBRONECTIN; PHALLOIDIN;

ARTICLE; ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CANCER CELL CULTURE; CELL ADHESION; CELL SHAPE; CELL STRAIN LNCAP; CYTOSKELETON; ELASTICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; YOUNG MODULUS;

ACTINS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL LINE, TUMOR; CELL SHAPE; COLLAGEN TYPE I; ELASTIC MODULUS; FIBRONECTINS; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ATOMIC FORCE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 78149471066     PISSN: 0006291X     EISSN: 10902104     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2010.10.034     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Jemal A., Siegel R., Ward E., et al. Cancer statistics, 2008. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2008, 58:71-96.
2. Keller E.T., Zhang J., Cooper C.R., et al. Prostate carcinoma skeletal metastases: cross-talk between tumor and bone. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2001, 20:333-349.
3. Msaouel P., Pissimissis N., Halapas A., Koutsilieris M. Mechanisms of bone metastasis in prostate cancer: clinical implications. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 2008, 22:341-355.
4. Bubendorf L., Schopfer A., Wagner U., et al. Metastatic patterns of prostate cancer: an autopsy study of 1, 589 patients. Hum. Pathol. 2000, 31:578-583.
5. Koutsilieris M. Osteoblastic metastasis in advanced prostate cancer. Anticancer Res. 1993, 13:443-449.
6. Cooper C.R., Chay C.H., Gendernalik J.D., et al. Stromal factors involved in prostate carcinoma metastasis to bone. Cancer 2003, 97:739-747.
7. Kiefer J.A., Farach-Carson M.C. Type I collagen-mediated proliferation of PC3 prostate carcinoma cell line: implications for enhanced growth in the bone microenvironment. Matrix Biol. 2001, 20:429-437.
8. Hall C.L., Dai J. K.L. van Golen, E.T. Keller, M.W. Long, Type I collagen receptor (alpha 2 beta 1) signaling promotes the growth of human prostate cancer cells within the bone. Cancer Res. 2006, 66:8648-8654.
9. Bausch A.R., Ziemann F., Boulbitch A.A., Jacobson K., Sackmann E. Local measurements of viscoelastic parameters of adherent cell surfaces by magnetic bead microrheometry. Biophys. J. 1998, 75:2038-2049.
10. Suresh S. Biomechanics and biophysics of cancer cells. Acta Biomater. 2007, 3:413-438.
11. Lamontagne C.A., Cuerrier C.M., Grandbois M. AFM as a tool to probe and manipulate cellular processes. Pflugers Arch. 2008, 456:61-70.
12. Li Q.S., Lee G.Y., Ong C.N., Lim C.T. AFM indentation study of breast cancer cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2008, 374:609-613.
13. Docheva D., Padula D., Popov C., Mutschler W., Clausen-Schaumann H., Schieker M. Researching into the cellular shape, volume and elasticity of mesenchymal stem cells, osteoblasts and osteosarcoma cells by atomic force microscopy,. J. Cell. Mol. Med. 2008, 12:537-552.
14. Guck J., Schinkinger S., Lincoln B., et al. Optical deformability as an inherent cell marker for testing malignant transformation and metastatic competence. Biophys. J. 2005, 88:3689-3698.
15. Darling E.M., Zauscher S., Block J.A., Guilak F. A thin-layer model for viscoelastic, stress-relaxation testing of cells using atomic force microscopy: do cell properties reflect metastatic potential?. Biophys. J. 2007, 92:1784-1791.
16. Domke J., Dannohl S., Parak W.J., Muller O., Aicher W.K., Radmacher M. Substrate dependent differences in morphology and elasticity of living osteoblasts investigated by atomic force microscopy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2000, 19:367-379.
17. Tantivejkul K., Kalikin L.M., Pienta K.J. Dynamic process of prostate cancer metastasis to bone. J. Cell. Biochem. 2004, 91:706-717.
18. Chirgwin J.M., Guise T.A. Skeletal metastases: decreasing tumor burden by targeting the bone microenvironment. J. Cell. Biochem. 2007, 102:1333-1342.
19. Ramaswamy S., Ross K.N., Lander E.S., Golub T.R. A molecular signature of metastasis in primary solid tumors. Nat. Genet. 2003, 33:49-54.
20. Levental K.R., Yu H., Kass L., et al. Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling. Cell 2009, 139:891-906.
21. Vogel V., Sheetz M. Local force and geometry sensing regulate cell functions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006, 7:265-275.
22. Discher D.E., Janmey P., Wang Y.L. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310:1139-1143.
23. Chowdhury F., Na S., Li D., et al. Material properties of the cell dictate stress-induced spreading and differentiation in embryonic stem cells. Nat. Mater. 2010, 9:82-88.
24. Faria E.C., Ma N., Gazi E., et al. Measurement of elastic properties of prostate cancer cells using AFM. Analyst 2008, 133:1498-1500.
25. Rotsch C., Radmacher M. Drug-induced changes of cytoskeletal structure and mechanics in fibroblasts: an atomic force microscopy study. Biophys. J. 2000, 78:520-535.
26. Lam W.A., Rosenbluth M.J., Fletcher D.A. Chemotherapy exposure increases leukemia cell stiffness. Blood 2007, 109:3505-3508.
27. Gardel M.L., Shin J.H., MacKintosh F.C., Mahadevan L., Matsudaira P., Weitz D.A. Elastic behavior of cross-linked and bundled actin networks. Science 2004, 304:1301-1305.
28. Tee S.Y., Bausch A.R., Janmey P.A. The mechanical cell. Curr. Biol. 2009, 19:R745-R748.
29. Hall C.L., Dubyk C.W., Riesenberger T.A., Shein D., Keller E.T., van Golen K.L. Type I collagen receptor (alpha2beta1) signaling promotes prostate cancer invasion through RhoC GTPase. Neoplasia. 2008, 10:797-803.
30. Nobes C.D., Hall A. Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, Lamellipodia, and filopodia,. Cell 1995, 81:53-62.