Granger causality mapping during joint actions reveals evidence for forward models that could overcome sensory-motor delays

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 10, 2010, Pages

  Kokal, Idil ^a   Keysers, Christian ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR NEUROSCIENCE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BRAIN REGION; CEREBELLUM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GRANGER CAUSALITY MAPPING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; JOINT FUNCTION; MIRROR NEURON SYSTEM; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOUSE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; NERVOUS SYSTEM; NONHUMAN; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PERCEPTION; PREDICTION; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THALAMUS; VISION; BRAIN; CYTOLOGY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; NERVE CELL; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHYSIOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL;

BRAIN; CAUSALITY; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NEURONS;

EID: 78149457950     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0013507     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Newman-Norlund RD, Noordzij ML, Meulenbroek RG, Bekkering H (2007) Exploring the brain basis of joint action: co-ordination of actions, goals and intentions. Soc Neurosci 2: 48-65.
2. Newman-Norlund RD, van Schie HT, van Zuijlen AM, Bekkering H (2007) The mirror neuron system is more active during complementary compared with imitative action. Nat Neurosci 10: 817-818.
3. Knoblich G, Jordan S (2002) The mirror system and joint action. In: Gallese MISV, ed. Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp 115-124.
4. Kokal I, Gazzola V, Keysers C (2009) Acting together in and beyond the mirror neuron system. Neuroimage 47: 2046-2056.
5. Roebroeck A, Formisano E, Goebel R (2005) Mapping directed influence over the brain using Granger causality and fMRI. Neuroimage 25: 230-242.
6. Sebanz N, Bekkering H, Knoblich G (2006) Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends Cogn Sci 10: 70-76.
7. Newman-Norlund RD, Bosga J, Meulenbroek RG, Bekkering H (2008) Anatomical substrates of cooperative joint-action in a continuous motor task: virtual lifting and balancing. Neuroimage 41: 169-177.
8. Sebanz N, Knoblich G, Prinz W, Wascher E (2006) Twin peaks: an ERP study of action planning and control in co-acting individuals. J Cogn Neurosci 18: 859-870.
9. Thioux M, Gazzola V, Keysers C (2008) Action understanding: how, what and why. Curr Biol 18: R431-434.
10. Etzel JA, Gazzola V, Keysers C (2008) Testing simulation theory with cross-modal multivariate classification of fMRI data. PLoS One 3: e3690.
11. Goebel R, Roebroeck A, Kim DS, Formisano E (2003) Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magn Reson Imaging 21: 1251-1261.
12. Jabbi M, Keysers C (2008) Inferior frontal gyrus activity triggers anterior insula response to emotional facial expressions. Emotion 8: 775-780.
13. Schippers MB, Roebroeck A, Renken R, Nanetti L, Keysers C (2010) Mapping the information flow from one brain to another during gestural communication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107: 9388-9393.
14. Gazzola V, Keysers C (2009) The observation and execution of actions share motor and somatosensory voxels in all tested subjects: single-subject analyses of unsmoothed fMRI data. Cereb Cortex 19: 1239-1255.
15. Del Giudice M, Manera V, Keysers C (2009) Programmed to learn? The ontogeny of mirror neurons. Developmental Science 12: 350-363.
16. Keysers C, Perrett DI (2004) Demystifying social cognition: a Hebbian perspective. Trends Cogn Sci 8: 501-507.
17. Adam JJ, Van Veggel LM (1991) Discrete finger response latencies in a simple reaction time task. Percept Mot Skills 73: 863-866.
18. Michie PT, Clarke AM, Sinden JD, Glue LC (1976) Reaction time and spinal excitability in a simple reaction time task. Physiol Behav 16: 311-315.
19. Keysers C, Kohler E, Umilta MA, Nanetti L, Fogassi L, et al. (2003) Audiovisual mirror neurons and action recognition. Exp Brain Res 153: 628-636.
20. Caspers S, Zilles K, Laird AR, Eickhoff SB (2010) ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain. Neuroimage 50: 1148-1167.
21. Keysers C, Kaas JH, Gazzola V (2010) Somatosensation in social perception. Nat Rev Neurosci 11: 417-428.
22. Deshpande G, Sathian K, Hu X (2010) Effect of hemodynamic variability on Granger causality analysis of fMRI. Neuroimage 52: 884-896.
23. Kilner JM, Friston KJ, Frith CD (2007) Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system. Cogn Process 8: 159-166.
24. Kilner JM, Vargas C, Duval S, Blakemore SJ, Sirigu A (2004) Motor activation prior to observation of a predicted movement. Nat Neurosci 7: 1299-1301.
25. Wolpert DM, Doya K, Kawato M (2003) A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358: 593-602.
26. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z, Jordan MI (1995) An internal model for sensorimotor integration. Science 269: 1880-1882.
27. Wolpert DM, Miall RC (1996) Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control. Neural Netw 9: 1265-1279.
28. Miall RC (2003) Connecting mirror neurons and forward models. Neuroreport 14: 2135-2137.
29. Iacoboni M, Koski LM, Brass M, Bekkering H, Woods RP, et al. (2001) Reafferent copies of imitated actions in the right superior temporal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 13995-13999.
30. Luppino G, Murata A, Govoni P, Matelli M (1999) Largely segregated parietofrontal connections linking rostral intraparietal cortex (areas AIP and VIP) and the ventral premotor cortex (areas F5 and F4). Exp Brain Res 128: 181-187.
31. Demiris J, Hayes G (2002) Imitation as a dual-route process featuring predictive and learning components: a biologically plausible computational model. In: DKaN CL, ed. Imitation in Animals and Artifacts Cambridge. MA: MIT Press. pp 327-361.
32. Schaal S, Ijspeert A, Billard A (2003) Computational approaches to motor learning by imitation. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 358: 537-547.
33. Keller PE (2008) Joint Action in Music Performance. In: Morganti F, Carassa A, Riva G, eds. A Cognitive and Social Perspective on the Study of Interactions. Amsterdam: IOS Press. pp 205-221.
34. Keller PE, Knoblich G, Repp BH (2007) Pianists duet better when they play with themselves: On the possible role of action simulation in synchronization. Consciousness and Cognition 16: 102-111.
35. Szymaszek A, Szelag E, Sliwowska M (2006) Auditory perception of temporal order in humans: the effect of age, gender, listener practice and stimulus presentation mode. Neurosci Lett 403: 190-194.
36. Dunlap K (1910) Reactions on rhythmic stimuli, with attempt to synchronize. Psychological Review 17: 399-416.
37. Johnson WS (1898) Researches in practice and habit. Studies from the Yale Psychology Laboratory 6: 51-105.
38. Miyake I (1902) Researches on rhythmic action. Studies from the Yale Psychology Laboratory 10: 1-48.
39. Repp BH (2005) Sensorimotor synchronization: a review of the tapping literature. Psychon Bull Rev 12: 969-992.
40. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z (2000) Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 3 Suppl: 1212-1217.
41. Hietanen JK, Perrett DI (1993) Motion sensitive cells in the macaque superior temporal polysensory area. I. Lack of response to the sight of the animal's own limb movement. Exp Brain Res 93: 117-128.
42. Hietanen JK, Perrett DI (1996) Motion sensitive cells in the macaque superior temporal polysensory area: response discrimination between self-generated and externally generated pattern motion. Behav Brain Res 76: 155-167.
43. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert D, Frith C (2000) Why can't you tickle yourself? Neuroreport 11: R11-16.
44. Blakemore SJ, Frith CD, Wolpert DM (2001) The cerebellum is involved in predicting the sensory consequences of action. Neuroreport 12: 1879-1884.
45. Blakemore SJ, Sirigu A (2003) Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe. Exp Brain Res 153: 239-245.
46. Dum RP, Strick PL (2003) An unfolded map of the cerebellar dentate nucleus and its projections to the cerebral cortex. J Neurophysiol 89: 634-639.
47. Stein JF, Glickstein M (1992) Role of the cerebellum in visual guidance of movement. Physiol Rev 72: 967-1017.
48. Kawato M, Kuroda T, Imamizu H, Nakano E, Miyauchi S, et al. (2003) Internal forward models in the cerebellum: fMRI study on grip force and load force coupling. Prog Brain Res 142: 171-188.
49. Wolpert DM, Miall RC, Kawato M (1998) Internal models in the cerebellum. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2: 338-347.
50. Friston KJ, Penny WD, Glaser DE (2005) Conjunction revisited. Neuroimage 25: 661-667.
51. Eickhoff SB, Stephan KE, Mohlberg H, Grefkes C, Fink GR, et al. (2005) A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data. Neuroimage 25: 1325-1335.