Ten things political scientists know that you don't

Forum

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Noel, Hans ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

conventional wisdom; political science scholarship

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149454092     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15408884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2202/1540-8884.1393     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Achen, C. and L. Bartels (2002): "Blind retrospection: Electoral responses to droughts, flu, and shark attacks," Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, Mass.
2. Adkins, R. E. and A. Dowdle (2005): "Do early birds get the worm? Improving timeliness of presidential nomination forecasts" Presidential Studies Quarterly. Vol. 35, No. 4
3. Aldrich, J. (1995): Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
4. American Political Science Association, Committee on Political Parties. (1950): "Toward a more responsible two-party system," American Political Science Review, 44.
5. Ansolabehere, S. and S. Iyengar (1995): Going Negative: How Attack Ads Shrink and Polarize the Electorate, New York: Simon and Schuster.
6. Arrow, K. J. (1951): Social Choice and Individual Values, New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1st edition.
7. Bartels, L. M. and J. R. Zaller (2001): "Presidential vote models: A recount," PS: Political Science & Politics. Vol. 34, No. 1 pp. 9-20.
8. Bawn, K., M. Cohen, D. Karol, S. Masket, H. Noel, and J. R. Zaller (2006): "A theory of parties," Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, Pa.
9. Black, D. (1958): The Theory of Committees and Elections, New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Campbell, A., P. E. Converse, W. E. Miller, and D. E. Stokes (1960): The American Voter, New York: Wiley.
11. Cohen, M., D. Karol, H. Noel, and J. Zaller (2008): The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Condorcet, M. d. (1785): Essai sur l'application de l'analyse a la probabilite des decisions redues a la pluralite des voix, Paris.
13. Converse, P. (1964): "The nature of belief systems in mass publics," in D. Apter, ed., Ideology and Discontent, New York: Free Press, 206-261.
14. Cox, G. W. (1997): Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World's Electoral Systems, Political Economy of Institutions and Decisions, New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Downs, A. (1957): An Economic Theory of Democracy, New York: HarperCollins Publishers, Inc.
16. Duverger, M. (1951): Political Parties: Their Organizations and Activity in the Modern State, London: Methuen and Co.
17. Gelman, A. and G. King (1993): "Why are American presidential election campaign polls so variable when votes are so predictable?" British Journal of Political Science, 23, 409-451.
18. Grossback, L. J., D. A. M. Peterson, and J. A. Stimson (2006): Mandate Politics, Cambridge University Press.
19. Grossback, L. J., D. A. M. Peterson, and J. A. Stimson (2007): "Electoral Mandates in American Politics" British Journal of Political Science. Vol 37. pp. 711-730.
20. Heaney, M. and F. Rojas (2007): "Partisans, Nonpartisans, and the Antiwar Movement in the United States," American Politics Research, 34, 431-464.
21. Heaney, M. and F. Rojas (2008): "Coalition Dissolution, Mobilization, and Network Dynamics in the U.S. Antiwar Movement" Research in Social Movements, Conflicts and Change. Vol. 28. 39-82.
22. Hibbs, D. (2000): "Bread and peace voting in U.S. presidential elections" Public Choice. Vol.104, Nos. 1-2. 149-180.
23. Hotelling, H. (1929): "Stability in Competition," Economic Journal, 39, 41-57.
24. Iyengar, S. and D. R. Kinder (1987): News that Matters: Television and American Opinion, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
25. Karol, D. (2009): Party Position Change in American Politics: Coalition Management, New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. Keith, B. E., D. B. Magleby, C. J. Nelson, E. Orr, M. C. Westlye, and R. E. Wolfinger (1992): The Myth of the Independent Voter, Berkeley: University of California Press.
27. Lippmann, W. (1922): Public Opinion, Harcourt Brace and Company.
28. MacKuen, M. B., R. S. Erikson, and J. A. Stimson (1989): "Macropartisanship," American Political Science Review, 83, 1125-1142.
29. Masket, S. (2009): No Middle Ground: How Informal Party Organizations Control Nominations and Polarize Legislatures, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
30. Mayer, W. G. (1996): "Forecasting Presidential Nominations," in W. G. Mayer, ed., In Pursuit of the White House: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees, Chatham: Chatham House.
31. Mayer, W. G., ed. (2004): The Making of the Presidential Candidates 2004, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
32. Mayer, W. G., ed. (2008): The Making of the Presidential Candidates 2008, New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
33. Riker, W. (1982): "The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science," The American Political Science Review. Vol. 76, 753-766.
34. Schattschneider, E. (1942): Party Government, Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
35. Schlesinger, J. A. (1994): Political Parties and the Winning of Office, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
36. Sniderman, P. M. and E. G. Carmines (1997): Reaching Beyond Race, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
37. Steger, W. P. (2007): "Who wins presidential nominations and why: An updated forecast of the presidential primary vote" Presidential Research Quarterly. Vol. 60. 91-97.
38. Tarrow, S. (1998): Power in Movement: Social Movements and Contentious Politics, Cambridge University Press, 2nd edition.
39. Vavreck, L. (2009): The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns, Princeton University Press.
40. Walker, E. T., J. D. McCarthy, and F. Baumgartner (2010): "Replacing members with managers? Mutualism among membership and nonmembership advocacy organizations in the United States" American Journal of Sociology. Vol. 116 No. 4.
41. Zaller, J. R. (1992): The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press