Predicting the growth of early spelling skills: Are there heterogeneous developmental trajectories?

Scientific Studies of Reading

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 485-513

  Lervåg, Arne ^a   Hulme, Charles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149449882     PISSN: 10888438     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10888431003623488     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Boscardin, C. K., Muthén, B., Francis. D. J., & Baker, E. L. (2008). Early identification of reading difficulties using heterogeneous developmental trajectories. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 192-208.
2. Bowey, J. A. (2005). Predicting individual differences in learning to read. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Ed.), The science of reading. A handbook (pp. 153-172). Hong Kong: Blackwell.
3. Bråten, I. (1994). Learning to spell: Training orthographic problem-solving with poor spellers-a strategy instructional approach. Oslo, Norway: Scandinavian University Press.
4. Caravolas, M., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2001). The foundations of spelling ability: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Memory and Language, 45, 751-774.
5. Cardoso-Martins, C., & Pennington, B. F. (2004). The relationship between phoneme awareness and rapid serial naming skills and literacy acquisition: The role of developmental period and reading ability. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 27-52.
6. de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (1999). Specific contributions of phonological abilities to early reading acquisition: Results from a Dutch latent variable longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 450-476.
7. Furnes, B., & Samuelsson, Stefan. (2009). Preschool cognitive and language skills predicting kindergarten and Grade 1 reading and spelling: A cross-linguistic comparison. Journal of Research in Reading, 32, 275-292.
8. Georgiou, G. K., Parrila, R., & Papadopoulos, T. C. (2008). Predictors of word decoding and reading fluency across languages varying in orthographic consistency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100,566-580.
9. Graham, J. W., Cumsille, P. E., & Elek-Fisk, E. (2003). Methods for handling missing data. In J. A. Schinka, W. F. Weiner, & I. B. Weiner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 2: Research methods in psychology (pp. 87-144). New York, NY: Wiley & Sons.
10. Hagtvet, B. E., & Lyster, S. A. H. (2003). The spelling errors of Norwegian good and poor decoders: A developmental cross-linguistic perspective. In N. Goulandris (Ed.), Dyslexia in different language: Cross-linguistic comparisons (pp. 181-207). London, UK: Whurr.
11. Hulme, C., Goetz, K., Gooch, D., Adams, J., & Snowling, M. J. (2007). Paired-associate learning, phoneme awareness and learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 96, 150-160.
12. Hulme, C., Snowling, M., Caravolas, M., & Carroll, J. (2005). Phonological skills are (probably) one cause of success in learning to read: A comment on Castles and Coltheart. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 351-365.
13. Kail, R., & Hall, L. K. (1994). Processing speed, naming speed, and reading. Developmental Psychology, 30, 949-954.
14. Kirby, J. R., Parrila, K. R., & Pfeiffer, S. L. (2003). Naming speed and phonological awareness as predictors of reading development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 453-464.
15. Klinkenberg, J. E., & Skaar, E. (2003). STAS. Standardisert test i ordavkoding og staving [Standardized test for word decoding and spelling]. Norway: Eikli AS. -Grafisk.
16. Landerl, K., & Wimmer, H. (2008). Development of word reading fluency and spelling in a consistent orthography: An 8-year follow-up. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 150-161.
17. Landerl, K., Wimmer, H., & Frith, U. (1997). The impact of orthographic consistency on dyslexia: A German-English Comparison. Cognition, 63, 315-334.
18. Leppänen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2004). Development of reading skills among preschool and primary school pupils. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 72-93.
19. Leppänen, U., Niemi, P., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J. E. (2006). Development of reading and spelling Finnish from preschool to Grade 1 and Grade 2. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 3-30.
20. Lervåg, A., Bråten, I., & Hulme, C. (2009). The cognitive and linguistic foundations of early reading development: A Norwegian latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 45, 764-781.
21. Lervåg, A., & Hulme, C. (2009). Rapid automatized naming (RAN) taps a mechanism that places constraints on the development of early reading fluency. Psychological Science, 20, 1040-1048.
22. Manis, F. R., Seidenberg, M. S., & Doi, L. M. (1999). Dick RAN: Rapid naming and the longitudinal prediction of reading subskills in first and second graders. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 129-157.
23. Mayringer, H., & Wimmer, H. (2000). Pseudoname learning by German-speaking children with dyslexia: Evidence for a phonological learning deficit. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 75, 116-133.
24. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 159(3810), 56-63.
25. Moll, K., Fussenegger, B., Willburger, E., & Landerl, K. (2009). RAN is not a measure of orthographic processing. Evidence from the asymmetric German orthography. Scientific Studies of Reading, 13, 1-25.
26. Muter, V., Hulme, C., Snowling, M., & Taylor, S. (1998). Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 3-27.
27. Muthén, B. (2004). Latent variable analysis: Growth mixture modeling and related techniques for longitudinal data. In D. Kaplan (Ed.), Handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences (pp. 345-368). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
28. Nikolopoulos, D., Goulandris, N., Hulme, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2006). The cognitive bases of learning to read and spell in Greek: Evidence from a longitudinal study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 1-17.
29. Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 535-569.
30. Papazian, E. (1984). Talemål og skriftspråk: Forskjellen og samsvaret [Spoken and written language: The difference and the equalities]. Skriftserie nr. 16, Serie B - Forskningsrapporter og Orginalarbeider [published report], Universitetet I Bergen, Norway.
31. Parrila, K. R., Aunola, K., Leskinen, E., Nurmi, J. E., & Kirby, J. R. (2005). Development of individual differences in reading: Results from longitudinal studies in English and Finnish. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 299-319.
32. Petras, H., & Masyn, K. (2009). General growth mixture analysis with antecedents and consequences of change. In A. Piquero & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative criminology (pp. 69-100). New York, NY: Springer.
33. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1990). Manual for Ravens Progressive Matrixes and Vocabulary Scales. Section 2, Coloured Progressive Matrixes. Oxford, UK: Oxford Psychology Press.
34. Savage, R., Pillay, V., & Melidona, S. (2008). Rapid naming is a unique predictor of spelling in Children. Journal of Learning Abilities, 41, 235-250.
35. Seidenberg, M. S., & McClelland, J. L. (1989). A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, 523-568.
36. Seymour, P. H., Aro, M., & Erskine, J. M. (2003). Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 143-174.
37. Stoel, R., van den Wittenboer, G., & Hox, J. (2004). Including time-invariant covariates in the latent growth curve model. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 21-42.
38. Strattman, K., & Hodson, B. W. (2005). Variables that influence decoding and spelling in beginning readers. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 21, 165-190.
39. Tornéus, M. (1984). Phonological awareness and reading: A chicken and egg problem? Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1346-1358.
40. Treiman, R., Zukowski, A., & Richmond-Welty, E. D. (1995). What happened to the "n" of sink? Children's spellings of final consonant clusters. Cognition, 55, 1-38.
41. Undheim, J. O. (1978). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised: WISC-R manual (J. O. Undheim, Norwegian ed.). Jaren, Norway: Norsk Psykologforening.
42. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., Hect, S. A., Barker, T. A., Burgess, S. R., et al. (1997). Changing relations between phonological processing abilities and word-level reading as children develop from beginning to skilled readers:A5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 33, 468-479.
43. Wimmer, H., Landerl, K., Linortner, R., & Hummer, P. (1991). The relationship of phonemic awareness to reading acquisition: More consequence than precondition but still important. Cognition, 40, 219-249.
44. Wimmer, H., & Mayringer, H. (2002). Dysfluent reading in the absence of spelling difficulties: A specific disability in regular orthographies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 272-277.
45. Wimmer, H., Mayringer, H., & Landerl, K. (1998). Poor reading: A deficit in skill-automatization or a phonological deficit. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2, 321-340.
46. Wolf, M., & Bowers, P. G. (1999). The double-deficit hypothesis for the developmental dyslexias. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 415-438.