Recombinant spider silk as matrices for cell culture

Biomaterials

Volumn 31, Issue 36, 2010, Pages 9575-9585

  Widhe, Mona ^a   Bysell, Helena ^b   Nystedt, Sara ^c   Schenning, Ingrid ^c   Malmsten, Martin ^b   Johansson, Jan ^a   Rising, Anna ^a   Hedhammar, My ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Spiber Technologies AB   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biomaterial; Collagen production; Cytocompatibility; Fibroblasts; Serum free; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

ACTIN FILAMENT; CELL COUNT; COLLAGEN TYPE I; CYTOCOMPATIBILITY; IN-VITRO; MATRIX; NANOTOPOGRAPHIES; SERUM FREE; SERUM PROTEINS; SPIDER SILK PROTEIN; SPIDER SILKS; TISSUE ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS;

ANIMAL CELL CULTURE; BODY FLUIDS; COLLAGEN; FIBROBLASTS; SILK; TISSUE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

CELL CULTURE;

COLLAGEN TYPE 1; PROTEIN; SPIDER SILK PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; BIOFILM; CELL ADHESION; CELL COUNT; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL VIABILITY; FIBER; FIBROBLAST; FOAM; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SILK;

ACTINS; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ANIMALS; CELL ADHESION; CELL CULTURE TECHNIQUES; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SURVIVAL; COLLAGEN TYPE I; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FIBROBLASTS; FLUORESCENT ANTIBODY TECHNIQUE; HUMANS; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SILK; SPIDERS;

COLLAGEN; MICROSTRUCTURE; NATURAL FIBERS; PROTEIN FIBERS; SILK; TISSUE CULTURE;

ANIMALIA; ARANEAE;

EID: 78149406950     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.08.061     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Wang Y., Kim H.J., Vunjak-Novakovic G., Kaplan D.L. Stem cell-based tissue engineering with silk biomaterials. Biomaterials 2006, 27:6064-6082.
2. Griffith L.G., Naughton G. Tissue engineering-current challenges and expanding opportunities. Science 2002, 295:1009-1014.
3. Lee J., Cuddihy M.J., Kotov N.A. Three-dimensional cell culture matrices: state of the art. Tissue Eng Part B Rev 2008, 14:61-86.
4. Dutta R.C., Dutta A.K. Cell-interactive 3D-scaffold; advances and applications. Biotechnol Adv 2009, 27:334-339.
5. Schmeichel K.L., Bissell M.J. Modeling tissue-specific signaling and organ function in three dimensions. J Cell Sci 2003, 116:2377-2388.
6. Engler A.J., Sen S., Sweeney H.L., Discher D.E. Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126:677-689.
7. Janmey P.A., McCulloch C.A. Cell mechanics: integrating cell responses to mechanical stimuli. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2007, 9:1-34.
8. Kong H.J., Polte T.R., Alsberg E., Mooney D.J. FRET measurements of cell-traction forces and nano-scale clustering of adhesion ligands varied by substrate stiffness. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:4300-4305.
9. Petroll W.M., Ma L. Direct, dynamic assessment of cell-matrix interactions inside fibrillar collagen lattices. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 2003, 55:254-264.
10. Abbott A. Cell culture: biology's new dimension. Nature 2003, 424:870-872.
11. Brown R.A., Phillips J.B. Cell responses to biomimetic protein scaffolds used in tissue repair and engineering. Int Rev Cytol 2007, 262:75-150.
12. Mano J.F., Silva G.A., Azevedo H.S., Malafaya P.B., Sousa R.A., Silva S.S., et al. Natural origin biodegradable systems in tissue engineering and regenerative medicine: present status and some moving trends. J R Soc Interface 2007, 4:999-1030.
13. Melkoumian Z., Weber J.L., Weber D.M., Fadeev A.G., Zhou Y., Dolley-Sonneville P., et al. Synthetic peptide-acrylate surfaces for long-term self-renewal and cardiomyocyte differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:606-610.
14. Rodin S., Domogatskaya A., Strom S., Hansson E.M., Chien K.R., Inzunza J., et al. Long-term self-renewal of human pluripotent stem cells on human recombinant laminin-511. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:611-615.
15. Villa-Diaz L.G., Nandivada H., Ding J., Nogueira-de-Souza N.C., Krebsbach P.H., O'Shea K.S., et al. Synthetic polymer coatings for long-term growth of human embryonic stem cells. Nat Biotechnol 2010, 28:581-583.
16. Altman G.H., Diaz F., Jakuba C., Calabro T., Horan R.L., Chen J., et al. Silk-based biomaterials. Biomaterials 2003, 24:401-416.
17. Rising A., Widhe M., Johansson J., Hedhammar M. Spider silk proteins: recent advances in recombinant production, structure-function relationships and biomedical applications. Cell Mol Life Sci 2010, 10.1007/s00018-010-0462-z.
18. Scheibel T. Spider silks: recombinant synthesis, assembly, spinning, and engineering of synthetic proteins. Microb Cell Fact 2004, 3:14.
19. Stark M., Grip S., Rising A., Hedhammar M., Engstrom W., Hjalm G., et al. Macroscopic fibers self-assembled from recombinant miniature spider silk proteins. Biomacromolecules 2007, 8:1695-1701.
20. Agapov I.I., Pustovalova O.L., Moisenovich M.M., Bogush V.G., Sokolova O.S., Sevastyanov V.I., et al. Three-dimensional scaffold made from recombinant spider silk protein for tissue engineering. Dokl Biochem Biophys 2009, 426:127-130.
21. Bini E., Foo C.W., Huang J., Karageorgiou V., Kitchel B., Kaplan D.L. RGD-functionalized bioengineered spider dragline silk biomaterial. Biomacromolecules 2006, 7:3139-3145.
22. Hedhammar M., Bramfeldt H., Baris T., Widhe M., Askarieh G., Nordling K., et al. Sterilized recombinant spider silk fibers of low pyrogenicity. Biomacromolecules 2010, 11:953-959.
23. Morgan A.W., Roskov K.E., Lin-Gibson S., Kaplan D.L., Becker M.L., Simon C.G. Characterization and optimization of RGD-containing silk blends to support osteoblastic differentiation. Biomaterials 2008, 29:2556-2563.
24. Scheller J., Henggeler D., Viviani A., Conrad U. Purification of spider silk-elastin from transgenic plants and application for human chondrocyte proliferation. Transgenic Res 2004, 13:51-57.
25. Yang L., Hedhammar M., Blom T., Leifer K., Johansson J., Habibovic P., et al. Biomimetic calcium phosphate coatings on recombinant spider silk fibres. Biomed Mater 2010, 5:045002.
26. Baoyong L., Jian Z., Denglong C., Min L. Evaluation of a new type of wound dressing made from recombinant spider silk protein using rat models. Burns 2010, 36:891-896.
27. Fredriksson C., Hedhammar M., Feinstein R., Nordling K., Kratz G., Johansson J., et al. Tissue response to subcutaneously implanted recombinant spider silk: an in vivo study. Materials 2009, 2:1908-1922.
28. Spiess K., Lammel A., Scheibel T. Recombinant spider silk proteins for applications in biomaterials. Macromol Biosci 2010, 10.1002/mabi.201000071.
29. Hedhammar M., Rising A., Grip S., Martinez A.S., Nordling K., Casals C., et al. Structural properties of recombinant nonrepetitive and repetitive parts of major ampullate spidroin 1 from Euprosthenops australis: implications for fiber formation. Biochemistry 2008, 47:3407-3417.
30. Malmsten M. Biopolymers at interfaces 2003, Marcel Dekker, New York. 2nd ed.
31. Hezi-Yamit A., Sullivan C., Wong J., David L., Chen M., Cheng P., et al. Impact of polymer hydrophilicity on biocompatibility: implication for DES polymer design. J Biomed Mater Res A 2009, 90:133-141.
32. Lee J.H., Khang G., Lee J.W., Lee H.B. Interaction of different types of cells on polymer surfaces with wettability gradient. J Colloid Interface Sci 1998, 205:323-330.
33. Luna S.M., Silva S.S., Gomez M.E., Mano J.F., Reis R.L. Cell adhesion and proliferation onto chitosan-based membranes treated by plasma surface modification. J Biomater Appl 2010, 10.1177/0885328210362924.
34. Ruardy T., Moorlag H., Schakenraad J., Van Der Mei H., Busscher H. Growth of fibroblasts and endothelial cells on wettability gradient surfaces. J Colloid Interface Sci 1997, 188:209-217.
35. Schulte V.A., Diez M., Moller M., Lensen M.C. Surface topography induces fibroblast adhesion on intrinsically nonadhesive poly(ethylene glycol) substrates. Biomacromolecules 2009, 10:2795-2801.
36. Walboomers X.F., Monaghan W., Curtis A.S., Jansen J.A. Attachment of fibroblasts on smooth and microgrooved polystyrene. J Biomed Mater Res 1999, 46:212-220.
37. Teixeira A.I., Nealey P.F., Murphy C.J. Responses of human keratocytes to micro- and nanostructured substrates. J Biomed Mater Res A 2004, 71:369-376.
38. Hakimi O., Gheysens T., Vollrath F., Grahn M.F., Knight D.P., Vadgama P. Modulation of cell growth on exposure to silkworm and spider silk fibers. J Biomed Mater Res A 2010, 92:1366-1372.
39. Hu K., Ji L., Applegate K.T., Danuser G., Waterman-Storer C.M. Differential transmission of actin motion within focal adhesions. Science 2007, 315:111-115.
40. Yamada K.M., Clark K. Cell biology: survival in three dimensions. Nature 2002, 419:790-791.
41. Pellegrin S., Mellor H. Actin stress fibres. J Cell Sci 2007, 120:3491-3499.
42. Gjorevski N., Nelson C.M. Bidirectional extracellular matrix signaling during tissue morphogenesis. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2009, 20:459-465.
43. Dal Pra I., Petrini P., Charini A., Bozzini S., Fare S., Armato U. Silk fibroin-coated three-dimensional polyurethane scaffolds for tissue engineering: interactions with normal human fibroblasts. Tissue Eng 2003, 9:1113-1121.
44. Foroughi F., Aibibu D., Aulin C., Hilborn J., Brown R.A. Bulk collagen incorporation rates into knitted stiff fibre polymer in tissue-engineered scaffolds: the rate-limiting step. J Tissue Eng Regen Med 2008, 2:507-514.