Rural community views on the role of local and extralocal interests in public lands governance

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 23, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 1170-1186

  Yung, Laurie ^a   Patterson, Michael E ^a   Freimund, Wayne A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

Community based conservation; Environmental conflict; Public lands policy; Rural communities; Western environmental values

Indexed keywords

CONFLICT MANAGEMENT; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; DECISION MAKING; DISPUTE RESOLUTION; ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; RURAL SOCIETY;

MONTANA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 78149380132     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920903005787     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Agrawal, A., and Gibson, C. C. 1999. Enchantment and disenchantment: The role of community in natural resource conservation. World Dev. 27(4):629-649.
2. Axline, M. 1999. Federal lands and invisible hands. Ecol. Law Q. 25(4):611-623.
3. Azar, L. 1990. Twentieth century in crisis: Foundations of totalitarianism. Dubuque, IL: Kendall Hunt.
4. Baden, J., and D. Snow, eds. 1997. The next West: Public lands, community, and economy in the American West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
5. Bebbington, A. J., and S. P. J. Batterbury. 2001. Transnational livelihoods and landscapes: Political ecologies of globalization. Ecumene 8(4):369-380.
6. Belsky, J. M. 1999. Misrepresenting communities: The politics of community-based rural ecotourism in Gales Point Manatee, Belize. Rural Sociol. 64(4):641-666.
7. Brandenburg, A. M., and M. S. Carroll. 1995. Your place or mine? The effect of place creation on environmental values and landscape meanings. Society Nat. Resources 8:381-398.
8. Brewer, M. B. 2001. Ingroup identification and intergroup conflict: When does ingroup love become outgroup hate? In Social identity, intergroup conflict, and conflict reduction, ed. R. D. Ashmore, L. Jussium, and D. Wilder, 17-41. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
9. Bryan, T. A., and J. M. Wondolleck. 2003. When irresolvable becomes resolvable: The Quincy Library Group conflict. In Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases, ed. R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, and M. Elliott, 63-90. Washington, DC: Island Press.
10. Coggins, G. C. 1999. Regulating federal natural resources: A summary case against devolved collaboration. Ecol. Law Q. 25(4):602-610.
11. Daniels, S. E., and G. B. Walker. 1995. Managing local environmental conflict amidst national controversy. Int. J. Conflict Manage. 6(3):290-311.
12. Code of Federal Regulation. 2005. A national forest system land and resource management planning. 36 CFR 219. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture, U.S. Forest Service.
13. Durrant, J. O., and J. M. Shumway. 2004. Attitudes toward wilderness study areas: A survey of six southeastern Utah counties. Environ. Manage. 33(2):271-283.
14. Elliott, M., B. Gray, and R. J. Lewicki. 2003. Lessons learned about the framing and reframing of intractable environmental conflicts. In Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases, ed. R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, and M. Elliott, 409-435. Washington, DC: Island Press.
15. Fairfax, S. P., L. Fortmann, A. Hawkins, L. Huntsinger, N. L. Peluso, and S. A. Wolfe. 1999. The federal forests are not what they seem: Formal and informal claims to federal lands. Ecol. Law Q. 25:630-646.
16. Hunt, L., and W. Haider. 2001. Fair and effective decision making in forest management planning. Society Nat. Resources 14:873-887.
17. Kellert, S. R., J. N. Mehta, S. A. Ebbin, and L. L. Lichtenfeld. 2000. Community natural resource management: Promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society Nat. Resources 13:705-715.
18. Lauber, T. B., and B. A. Knuth. 1999. Measuring fairness in citizen participation: A case study of moose management. Society Nat. Resources 11:19-37.
19. Lewicki, R. J., B. Gray, and M. Elliott, eds. 2003. Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases. Washington, DC: Island Press.
20. Mascarenhas, M., and R. Scarce. 2004. The intention was 'good': Legitimacy, consensusbased decision making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada. Society Nat. Resources 17:1-22.
21. McGuire, K., and N. Sanyal. 2006. A human dimensions inquiry in watershed analysis: Listening to constituents' views of contested legitimacy on the National Forest. Society Nat. Resources 19:889-904.
22. McMahon, K. 2002. Teton County growth policy plan: County profile. Great Falls, MT: Applied Communications.
23. Nie, M. 2008. The governance of Western public lands. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
24. Patterson, M. E., and D. R. Williams. 2002. Collecting and analyzing qualitative data: Hermeneutic principles, methods, & case examples. Champaign, IL: Sagamore.
25. Pralle, S. 2006a. The "mouse that roured": Agenda setting in Canadian pesticide politics. Policy Stud. J. 34(2):171-194.
26. Pralle, S. 2006b. Branching out, digging in: Environmental advocacy and agenda setting. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
27. Putnam, L. L., and J. M. Wondolleck. 2003. Intractability: Definitions, dimensions, and distinctions. In Making sense of intractable environmental conflicts: Concepts and cases, ed. R. J. Lewicki, B. Gray, and M. Elliott, 35-59. Washington, DC: Island Press.
28. Smith, N. 1993. Homeless=global: Scaling places. In Mapping the futures: Local cultures global change, ed. J. Bird, 87-119. New York: Routledge.
29. Smith, P. D., and M. H. McDonough. 2001. Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision-making. Society Nat. Resources 14:239-249.
30. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Turner, J. C. 1999. Some current issues in research on social identity and self-categorization theories. In Social identity, ed. N. Ellemers, R. Spears, and B Doosje, 6-24. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
32. Vandergeest, P., and E. M. DuPuis. 1996. Introduction. In Creating the countryside: The politics of rural and environmental discourse, ed. E. M. DuPuis and P. Vandergeest, 1-25. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
33. Walker, P. 2003. Reconsidering "regional" political ecologies: Toward a political ecology of the rural American west. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 27(1):7-24.
34. Walker, P., and L. Fortmann. 2003. Whose landscape? A political ecology of the "exurban" Sierra. Cult. Geogr. 10:469-491.
35. Walker, P. A., and P. T. Hurley. 2004. Collaboration derailed: The politics of communitybased resource management in Nevada County. Society Nat. Resources 17:735-751.
36. Watts, M. 2000. Political ecology. In A companion to economic geography, ed. T. Barnes and E. Sheppard, 257-274. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
37. Wondolleck, J. M., and S. L. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
38. Young, I. M. 2000. Inclusion and democracy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. Yung, L. 2002. Community land use survey: Summary of survey results. A report to the Teton County Growth Management Policy Advisory Committee. Missoula: University of Montana, College of Forestry and Conservation.
40. Yung, L., W. A. Freimund, and J. Chandler-Pepelnjak. 2008. Wilderness politics in the American West: Rural community perspectives on the development of roadless lands. Int. J. Wilderness 14(2):14-23.