Responsiveness and minimal important differences after revision total hip arthroplasty

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Shi, Hon Yi ^a   Chang, Je Ken ^b   Wong, Chi Yin ^c   Wang, Jun Wen ^d   Tu, Yuan Kun ^e   Chiu, Herng Chia ^a   Lee, King Teh ^a  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c KAOHSIUNG VETERANS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^d CHANG GUNG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^e E DA HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REOPERATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78149356739     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-261     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Effectiveness of physiotherapy exercise following hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a systematic review of clinical trials. CJ Minns Lowe KL Barker ME Dewey CM Sackley, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009 10 98 10.1186/1471-2474-10-98 19653883
2. Variations in the pre-operative status of patients coming to primary hip replacement for osteoarthritis in European orthopaedic centres. P Dieppe A Judge S Williams I Ikwueke KP Guenther M Floeren J Huber T Ingvarsson I Learmonth LS Lohmander A Nilsdotter W Puhl D Rowley R Thieler K Dreinhoefer EUROHIP Study Group, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009 10 19 10.1186/1471-2474-10-19 19208230
3. Patient relevant outcome 7 years after total hip replacement for OA - a prospective study. AK Nilsdotter F Isaksson, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2010 11 47 10.1186/1471-2474-11-47 20222962
4. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. HL Hoeksma CH Van Den Ende HK Ronday A Heering FC Breedveld, Ann Rheum Dis 2003 62 935 938 10.1136/ard.62.10.935 12972470
5. The SF-36 Health Survey as a generic outcome measure in clinical trials of patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: tests of data quality, scaling assumptions and score reliability. M Kosinski SD Keller HT Hatoum SX Kong JE Ware, Med Care 1999 37 10 22
6. On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. CB Terwee FW Dekker WM Wiersinga MF Prummel PM Bossuyt, Qual Life Res 2003 12 349 362 10.1023/A:1023499322593 12797708
7. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after total knee replacement. A Escobar JM Quintana A Bilbao I Arástegui I Lafuente I Vidaurreta, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2007 15 273 280 10.1016/j.joca.2006.09.001 17052924
8. Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes. D Revicki RD Hays D Cella J Sloan, J Clin Epidemiol 2008 61 102 109 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.03.012 18177782
9. Responsiveness of five condition-specific and generic outcome assessment instruments for chronic pain. F Angst ML Verra S Lehmann A Aeschlimann, BMC Med Res Methodol 2008 8 26 10.1186/1471-2288-8-26 18439285
10. Psychometric evaluation of a Chinese (Taiwanese) version of the SF-36 health survey amongst middle-aged women from a rural community. JL Fuh SJ Wang SR Lu KD Juang SJ Lee, Qual Life Res 2000 9 675 683 10.1023/A:1008993821633 11236857
11. Generalized Estimating Equations. JW Hardin JM Hilbe, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC 2 2003
12. Comparative measurement efficiency and sensitivity of five health status instruments for arthritis research. MH Liang MG Larson KE Cullen JA Schwartz, Arthritis Rheum 1985 28 542 547 10.1002/art.1780280513 4004963
13. Patient-reported outcomes one year after primary hip replacement in a European Collaborative Cohort. A Judge C Cooper S Williams K Dreinhoefer P Dieppe, Arthritis Care Res 2010 62 480 488 10.1002/acr.20038
14. A leisurely look at the bootstrap, the jackknife, and cross-validation. B Efron G Gong, Am Statistician 1983 37 36 48 10.2307/2685844
15. Predictors of functional outcome two years following revision hip arthroplasty. AM Davis Z Agnidis E Badley A Kiss JP Waddell AE Gross, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006 88 685 691 10.2106/JBJS.E.00150 16595456
16. Performance of the Swedish SF-36 version 2.0. C Taft J Karlsson M Sullivan, Qual Life Res 2004 13 251 256 10.1023/B:QURE.0000015290.76254.a5 15058805
17. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. J Cohen, New York: Academic Press 1997
18. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. LE Kazis JJ Anderson RF Meenan, Med Care 1989 27 178 S189 10.1097/00005650-198903001-00015 2646488
19. Quantifying responsiveness of quality of life measures without an external criterion. GY Zou, Qual Life Res 2005 14 1545 1552 10.1007/s11136-004- 0027-4 16110934
20. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. JS Schmitt RP Di Fabio, J Clin Epidemiol 2004 57 1008 1018 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2004.02.007 15528051
21. Contribution of hospital characteristics to the volume-outcome relationship: dislocation and infection following total hip replacement surgery. DH Solomon E Losina JA Baron AH Fossel E Guadagnoli EA Lingard A Miner CB Phillips JN Katz, Arthritis Rheum 2002 46 2436 2444 10.1002/art.10478 12355492
22. Responsiveness and clinically important differences for the WOMAC and SF-36 after hip joint replacement. JM Quintana A Escobar A Bilbao I Arostegui I Lafuente I Vidaurreta, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2005 13 1076 2083 10.1016/j.joca.2005.06.012 16154777
23. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention. F Angst A Aeschlimann W Steiner G Stucki, Ann Rheum Dis 2001 60 834 840 11502609
24. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. HL Hoeksma CH Van Den Ende HK Ronday A Heering FC Breedveld, Ann Rheum Dis 2003 62 935 938 10.1136/ard.62.10.935 12972470
25. Measuring the outcome of health resort programs. M Weigl T Ewert J Kleinschmidt G Stucki, J Rheumatol 2006 33 764 770 16583479
26. Primary and revision hip arthroplasty: 5-year outcomes and influence of age and comorbidity. A Lübbeke JN Katz TV Perneger P Hoffmeyer, J Rheumatol 2007 4 394 400