Patient relevant outcome 7 years after total hip replacement for OA - A prospective study

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Nilsdotter, Anna K ^a,b   Isaksson, Fredrik ^b  

^a LUND UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b HALMSTAD HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMORBIDITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIP OSTEOARTHRITIS; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; SHORT FORM 36; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING AID; COHORT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MORTALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; TIME; WALKING DIFFICULTY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILITY LIMITATION; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; TIME; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77949458287     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-47     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. The operation of the century: total hip replacement. ID Learmonth C Young C Rorabeck, Lancet 2007 370 1508 1519 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7 17964352
2. Osteoarthritis: time to shift the paradigm. This includes distinguishing between severe disease and common minor disability. P Dieppe, BMJ 1999 318 1299 1300 10323792
3. A comparison of outcomes in osteoarthritis patients undergoing total hip and knee replacement surgery. CJ Bachmeier LM March MJ Cross HM Lapsley KL Tribe BG Courtenay PM Brooks, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2001 9 137 146 10.1053/joca.2000.0369 11330253
4. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. AK Nilsdotter IF Petersson EM Roos LS Lohmander, Ann Rheum Dis 2003 62 923 930 10.1136/ard.62.10.923 12972468
5. Short-term recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty. H Aarons G Hall S Hughes P Salmon, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1996 78-B 555 558
6. The importance of patient expectations in predicting functional outcomes after total joint arthroplasty. NN Mahomed MH Liang EF Cook LH Daltroy PR Fortin AH Fossel JN Katz, J Rheumatol 2002 29 1273 1279 12064846
7. Total joint arthroplasties: current concepts of patient outcomes after surgery. CA Jones LA Beaupre DW Johnston ME Suarez-Almazor, Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2007 33 71 86 10.1016/j.rdc.2006.12.008 17367693
8. Patient-reported health status in total joint replacement. R Benroth S Gawande, J Arthroplasty 1999 14 576 580 10.1016/S0883-5403(99)90080-3 10475557
9. Predictive factors of total hip replacement due to primary osteoarthritis: a prospective 2 year study of 505 patients. L Gossec F Tubach G Baron P Ravaud I Logeart M Dougados, Ann Rheum Dis 2005 64 1028 1032 10.1136/ard.2004.029546 15640268
10. Relationship of Total Hip Arthroplsty Outcomes to Other Orthopaedic Procedures. WJ Hozack RH Rothman TJ Albert RA Balderston K Eng, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 1997 344 88 93 10.1097/00003086-199711000- 00010 9372761
11. The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: but why should we use it? GM Kiebzak M Campbell DR Mauerhan, Am J Manag Care 2002 8 463 474 12019598
12. Predicting Quality-of-life Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty. FX Mc Guigan WJ Hozack L Moriarty K Eng RH Rothman, J Arthroplasty 1995 10 742 747 10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80069-5 8749755
13. Comparative outcomes of total joint arthroplasty. MA Ritter MJ Albohm EM Keating PM Faris JB Meding, J Arthroplasty 1995 10 737 741 10.1016/S0883- 5403(05)80068-3 8749754
14. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). JE Ware CD Sherbourne, Med Care 1992 30 473 483 10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 1593914
15. The Swedish SF-36 Health Survey-I. Evaluation of data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability and construct validity across general populations in Sweden. M Sullivan J Karlsson JR Ware, Soc Sci Med 1995 41 1349 1358 10.1016/0277-9536(95)00125-Q 8560302
16. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. N Bellamy W Buchanan C Goldsmith, J Orthop Rheumatol 1988 1 95 108
17. WOMAC osteoarthritis index. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness in patients with arthroscopically assessed osteoarthritis. Western Ontario and MacMaster Universities. EM Roos M Klässbo LS Lohmander, Scand J Rheumatol 1999 28 210 215 10.1080/03009749950155562 10503556
18. Where does it hurt? Pain localization in osteoarthritis of the knee. P Creamer M Lethbridge-Cejku MC Hochberg, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 1998 6 318 323 10.1053/joca.1998.0130 10197166
19. [Evaluation of a German version of WOMAC (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities) Arthrosis Index]. G Stucki D Meier S Stucki BA Michel AG Tyndall W Dick R Theiler, Z Rheumatol 1996 55 40 49 8868149
20. Chronic musculoskeletal pain, prevalence rates, and sociodemographic associations in a Swedish population study. S Bergman P Herrström K Högström I Petersson B Svensson L Jacobsson, J Rheumatol 2001 28 1369 1377 11409133
21. Comparison of a Generic (SF-36) and a Disease Specific (WOMAC) Instrument in Measurement of Outcomes after Knee Replacement Surgery. G Hawker C Melfi J Paul R Green C Bombardier, J Rheumatol 1995 22 1193 1196 7674255
22. Traumatic Arthritis of the Hip after Dislocation and Acetabular Fractures: Treatment by Mold Arthroplasty. WH Harris, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 1969 51-A 737 755
23. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? P Söderman H Malchau, Clin Orthop 2001 189 197 11249165
24. Health-related quality of life in total hip and total knee arthroplasty. A qualitative and systematic review of the literature. O Ethgen O Bruyere F Richy C Dardennes JY Reginster, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004 86-A 963 974 15118039
25. Quality of life and functional outcome after primary total hip replacement. A five-year follow-up. CY Ng JA Ballantyne IJ Brenkel, J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007 89 868 873 10.1302/0301-620X.89B7.18482 17673577
26. A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement. AK Nilsdotter S Toksvig-Larsen EM Roos, Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2009 17 601 606 10.1016/j.joca.2008.11.007 19091604
27. The placebo effect and its determinants in osteoarthritis: meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. W Zhang J Robertson AC Jones PA Dieppe M Doherty, Ann Rheum Dis 2008 67 1716 1723 10.1136/ard.2008.092015 18541604
28. Comparative responsiveness of measures of pain and function after total hip replacement. AK Nilsdotter EM Roos JP Westerlund HP Roos LS Lohmander, Arthritis Rheum 2001 45 258 262 10.1002/1529-0131(200106)45:3<258::AID- ART2583.0.CO;2-L 11409667
29. Patient-reported outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasty: comparison of midterm results. V Wylde AW Blom SL Whitehouse AH Taylor GT Pattison GC Bannister, J Arthroplasty 2009 24 210 216 10.1016/j.arth.2007.12.001 18534427
30. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. PR Fortin AE Clarke L Joseph MH Liang M Tanzer D Ferland C Phillips AJ Partridge P Belisle AH Fossel, et al. Arthritis Rheum 1999 42 1722 1728 10.1002/1529-0131(199908)42:8<1722:: AID-ANR223.0.CO;2-R 10446873
31. Influence of preoperative functional status on outcome after total hip arthroplasty. C Roder LP Staub S Eggli D Dietrich A Busato U Muller, J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007 89 11 17 10.2106/JBJS.E.00012 17200304
32. Variations in the pre-operative status of patients coming to primary hip replacement for osteoarthritis in European orthopaedic centres. P Dieppe A Judge S Williams I Ikwueke KP Guenther M Floeren J Huber T Ingvarsson I Learmonth LS Lohmander, et al. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2009 10 19 10.1186/1471-2474-10-19 19208230
33. Variation in age and physical status prior to total knee and hip replacement surgery: A comparison of centers in Australia and Europe. IN Ackerman PA Dieppe LM March EM Roos AK Nilsdotter GC Brown KE Sloan RH Osborne, Arthritis Rheum 2009 61 166 173 10.1002/art.24215 19177522
34. Patients' Expectations and Satisfaction With Total Hip Arthroplasty. CA Mancuso EA Salvati NA Johanson MGE Peterson ME Charlson, J Arthroplasty 1997 12 387 396 10.1016/S0883-5403(97)90194-7 9195314