Predictors and Outcomes of Ad Hoc Versus Non-Ad Hoc Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Volumn 2, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 350-356

  Hannan, Edward L ^a   Samadashvili, Zaza ^a   Walford, Gary ^b   Holmes, David R ^c   Jacobs, Alice ^d   Sharma, Samin ^e   Katz, Stanley ^f   King III, Spencer B ^g  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^b St Joseph's Hospital   (United States)

^c MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^d BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e MOUNT SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^f North Shore LIJ Health System ^*  (United States)

^g Saint Joseph's Hospital of Atlanta   (United States)

Author keywords

ad hoc PCI; in hospital mortality; long term mortality; non ad hoc PCI; subsequent revascularization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HEART INFARCTION; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MORTALITY; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HEART CATHETERIZATION; HOSPITAL MORTALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEW YORK; ODDS RATIO; PROPORTIONAL HAZARDS MODELS; REGISTRIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 64749084645     PISSN: 19368798     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2009.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. American Heart Association. Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: 2008 Update (2008) Dallas, TX
2. Blankenship J.C., Klein L.W., Laskey W.K., et al. SCAI statement on ad hoc versus the separate performance of diagnostic cardiac catheterization and coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 49 (2000) 130-134
3. Krone R.J., Shaw R.E., Klein L.W., Blankenship J.C., and Weintraub W.S. Ad hoc percutaneous coronary interventions in patients with stable coronary artery disease-a study of prevalence, safety, and variation in use from the American College of Cardiology National Cardiovascular data Registry (ACC-NCDR). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 68 (2006) 696-703
4. Shubrooks Jr. S.J., Malenka D.J., Piper W.D., et al. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary interventions performed immediately after diagnostic catheterization in Northern New England and comparison with similar procedures performed later. Am J Cardiol 86 (2000) 41-45
5. Goldstein C.L., Hannan E.L., and Racz M. The impact of cardiac catheterization-PCI timing on in-hospital mortality. Am Heart J 144 (2002) 561-567
6. Feldman D.N., Minutello R.M., Gade C.L., and Wong S.C. Outcomes following immediate (ad hoc) versus staged percutaneous coronary interventions (report from 2000 to 2001 New York State Angioplasty registry). Am J Cardiol 99 (2007) 446-449
7. O'Keefe J.H., Gernon C., McCallister B.D., Ligon R.W., and Hartzler G.O. Safety and cost-effectiveness of ad hoc angiography and angioplasty. Am Heart J 122 (1991) 50-54
8. Rozenman Y., Gilon D., Zelingher J., et al. One-stage coronary angiography and angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 75 (1995) 30-33
9. O'Keefe J.H., Reeder G.S., Miller G.A., Bailey K.R., and Holmes D.R. Safety and efficacy of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty performed at time of diagnostic catheterization compared with that performed at other times. Am J Cardiol 63 (1989) 27-29
10. Zeger S.L., Liang K.Y., and Albert P.S. Models for longitudinal data: a generalized estimating equation approach. Biometrics 42 (1988) 1049-1060
11. Ellison P. Survival Analysis Using the SAS System (1995), The SAS Institute, Cary, NC
12. Rosenbaum P.R., and Rubin D.R. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc 79 (1984) 516-524
13. Rosenbaum P.R., and Rubin D.B. The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika 70 (1983) 41-55
14. Eagle K., Guyton R., Davidoff R., et al. ACC/AHA 2004 guideline update for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: summary article. J Am Coll Cardiol 44 (2004) e213-e310