The effects of ongoing activity on time estimation in prospective remembering

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 774-791

  Occhionero, Miranda ^a   Esposito, Maria José ^a   Cicogna, Pier Carla ^a   Nigro, Giovanna ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

^b SECOND UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; HUMAN; MEMORY; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECALL; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 78149313529     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: 10990720     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/acp.1585     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Block, R. A., & Zakay, D. (2006). Prospective remembering involves time estimation and memory processes. In J. Glicksohn, & M. S. Myslobodsky (Eds.), Timing the future: The case for a time-based prospective memory (pp. 25-49). London: World Scientific.
2. Brown, S. W. (1997). Attentional resources in timing: Interference effects in concurrent temporal and nontemporal working memory tasks. Perception & Psychophysics, 59, 1118-1140.
3. Ceci, S. J., Baker, J. G., & Bronfenbrenner, U. (1988). Prospective remembering, temporal calibration, and context. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1, pp. 360-365). Chichester, England: Wiley.
4. Ceci, S. J., & Bronfenbrenner, U. (1985). 'Don't forget to take the cupcakes out of the oven': Prospective memory, strategic time-monitoring, and context. Child Development, 56, 152-164.
5. Cicogna, P., & Nigro, G. (1998). Influence of importance of intention on prospective memory performance. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 87, 1387-1392.
6. Cicogna, P., Nigro, G., Occhionero, M., & Esposito, M. J. (2005). Time-based prospective remembering: Interference and facilitation in a dual task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 17, 221-240.
7. Cook, G. I., Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (2005). Associating a time-based prospective memory task with an expected context can improve or impair intention completion. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 345-360.
8. Craik, F. I. M. (1986). A functional account of age differences in memory. In F. Klix, & H. Hagendorf (Eds.), Human memory and cognitive capabilities: Mechanisms and performances (pp. 409-422). Amsterdam, NL: Elsevier-North-Holland.
9. Craik, F. I. M., & Bialystok, E. (2006). Planning and task management in older adults: Cooking breakfast. Memory & Cognition, 34, 1236-1249.
10. d'Ydewalle, G., Bouckaert, D., & Brunfaut, E. (2001). Age-related differences and complexity of ongoing activities in time- and event-based prospective memory. The American Journal of Psychology, 3, 411-423.
11. d'Ydewalle, G., Luwel, K., & Brunfaut, E. (1999). The importance of on-going concurrent activities as a function of age in time- and event-based prospective memory. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 219-237.
12. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1990). Normal aging and prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 717-726.
13. Einstein, G. O., & McDaniel, M. A. (1996). Retrieval processes in prospective memory: Theoretical approaches and some new empirical findings. In M. A. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 115-141). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Richardson, S. L., Guynn, M. J., & Cunfer, A. R. (1995). Aging and prospective memory: Examining the influences of self-initiated retrieval processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 996-1007.
15. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Thomas, R., Mayfield, S., Shank, H., Morrisette, N., et al. (2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 327-342.
16. Ellis, J. A. (1988). Memory for future intentions: Investigating pulses and steps. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues (Vol. 1 pp. 371-376). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
17. Ellis, J. A. (1996). Prospective memory or the realization of delayed intentions: A conceptual framework for research. In M. Brandimonte, G. O. Einstein, & M. A. McDaniel (Eds.), Prospective memory: Theory and applications (pp. 1-22). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
18. Finstad, K., Bink, M., McDaniel, M., & Einstein, G. O. (2006). Breaks and task switches in prospective memory. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 20, 705-712.
19. Guynn, M. J. (2003). A two-process model of strategic monitoring in event-based prospective memory: Activation/retrieval mode and checking. International Journal of Psychology, 38, 245-256.
20. Harris, J. E., & Wilkins, A. J. (1982). Remembering to do things: A theoretical framework and an illustrative experiment. Human Learning, 1, 123-136.
21. Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Cook, G. I. (2005). Task interference in time-based, event-based, and dual intention prospective memory conditions. Journal of Memory and Language, 53, 430-444.
22. Hicks, J. L., Marsh, R. L., & Russell, E. J. (2000). The properties of retention intervals and their affect on retaining prospective memories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, 1160-1169.
23. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2001). Varying the importance of a prospective memory task: Differential effects across time- and event-based prospective memory. Memory, 9, 1-11.
24. Kliegel, M., Martin, M., McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2004). Importance effect on performance in event-based prospective memory tasks. Memory, 12, 553-561.
25. Kvavilashvili, L. (1987). Remembering intentions: Testing a new method of investigation. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12, 533-554.
26. Kvavilashvili, L., & Fisher, L. (2007). Is time-based prospective remembering mediated by self-initiated rehearsals? Role of incidental cues, ongoing activity, age, and motivation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 136, 112-132.
27. Mäntylä, T., & Carelli, M. G. (2006). Time monitoring and executive functioning: Individual and developmental differences. In J. Glickson, & M. Myslobodsky (Eds.), Timing the future: The case for a time-based prospective memory (pp. 191-211). New York: World Scientific.
28. Marsh, R. L., & Hicks, J. L. (1998). Event-based prospective memory and executive control of working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 24, 336-349.
29. Marsh, R. L., Hicks, J. L., & Cook, G. I. (2008). On beginning to understand the role of context in prospective memory. In M. Kliegel, M. A. McDaniel, & G. O. Einstein (Eds.), Prospective memory. Cognitive, neuroscience, developmental, and applied perspectives (pp. 77-100). New York-London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
30. Martin, M., & Schumann-Hengsteler, R. (2001). How task demands influence time-based prospective memory performance in young and older adults. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 25, 386-391.
31. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (1993). The importance of cue familiarity and cue distinctiveness in prospective memory. Memory, 1, 23-41.
32. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2000). Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 14, 127-144.
33. McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. (2007). Prospective memory: An overview and synthesis of an emerging field. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Einstein, G. O., & Breneiser, J. (2004). Cue-focused and reflexive-associative processes in prospective memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 605-614.
35. McDaniel, M. A., Guynn, M. J., Glinsky, E. R., Rubin, S. R., & Routhieaux, B. C. (1999). Prospective memory: A neuropsychological study. Neuropsychology, 13, 103-110.
36. McNerney, M. W., & West, R. (2007). An imperfect relationship between prospective memory and the prospective interference effect. Memory & Cognition, 35, 275-282.
37. Meier, B., Zimmermann, T. D., & Perrig, W. J. (2006). Retrieval experience in prospective memory: Strategic monitoring and spontaneous retrieval. Memory, 14, 872-889.
38. Monsell, S., Sumner, P., & Waters, H. (2003). Task-set reconfiguration with predictable and unpredictable task switches. Memory & Cognition, 31, 327-342.
39. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
40. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
41. Sellen, A. J., Louie, G., Harris, J. E., & Wilkins, A. J. (1997). What brings intentions to mind? An in situ study of prospective memory. Memory, 5, 483-507.
42. Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2004). A multinomial model of event-based prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756-777.
43. Smith, R. E., & Bayen, U. J. (2005). The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory. A formal modelling approach. Experimental Psychology, 52, 243-256.
44. Winograd, E. (1988). Some observations on prospective remembering. In M. M. Gruneberg, P. E. Morris, & R. N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory (Vol. 1, pp. 348-353). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
45. Zakay, D., & Bibi, A. (2002). Temporal judgements, selective attention and attention allocation policy. Unpublished manuscript. Israel: Tel-Aviv University.