Paradata: A new data source from web-administered measures

CIN - Computers Informatics Nursing

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 333-342

  Sowan, Azizeh K ^a   Jenkins, Louise S ^b  

^a HASHEMITE UNIVERSITY   (Jordan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

Log files; Measurement errors; Paradata; Web administered measures

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; FACTUAL DATABASE; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING INFORMATICS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARD;

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; DATABASES, FACTUAL; EDUCATION, NURSING, CONTINUING; HUMANS; INTERNET; NURSING INFORMATICS; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 78149310753     PISSN: 15382931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/NCN.0b013e3181f698fd     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Kehoe C, Pitkow, J. Surveying the territory: GVU's five WWW user surveys. World Wide Web J. 1996;1(3):77-84.
2. Castellan N. Computers and computing in psychology: twenty years of progress and still a bright future. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput. 1991;23:106-108.
3. Couper M. Web surveys: a review of issues and approaches. Public Opin Q. 2000;64:464-494.
4. Groves R. Survey Errors and Survey Costs. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1989.
5. Waltz C, Strickland O, Lenz E. Measurement in Nursing and Health Research. 3rd ed. New York: Springer Publishing Company; 2005.
6. Dillman D. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Method. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2000.
7. Lazar J, Preece J. Designing and implementing Web-based survey. J Comput Inform Syst. 1999;39(4):63-67.
8. Schleyer T, Forrest J. Methods for the design and administration of Web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;7:416-425.
9. Couper M. Usability evaluation of computer assisted research instruments. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2000;18:384-396.
10. Couper M. New technologies and survey data collection: challenges and opportunities. 2002. Paper presented at: International Conference on Improving Surveys; Copenhagen, Denmark. http://www.icis.dk/ICIS-papers/Keynote1-0-3.pdf. Accessed January 1, 2008.
11. Heerwegh D. Describing response behavior in Web-surveys using client side paradata. 2002. Paper presented at: International Workshop on Web-surveys October 17, 2002; Mannheim, Germany. http://www.websm.org/uploadi/editor/ describing%20response%20behavior%20in.pdf. Accessed February 3, 2008.
12. Heerwegh D. Uses of client side paradata in Web surveys. 2004. Paper presented at: International Symposium in Honour of Paul Lazarsfeld; Brussels, Belgium. http://www.websm.org/uploadi/editor/ Heerwegh20Uses20of20Client20Side20Paradata20in20 Web20Surveys.pdf. Accessed March 4, 2008.
13. Heerwegh D. The CSP Project Web page. 2003. http://perswww.kuleuven.ac. be/~u0034437/public/csp.htm. Accessed March 2, 2008.
14. Heerwegh D, Loosveldt G. Radio buttons or select menus: an evaluation of the effect of response formats on data quality in Web surveys. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2002;20:471-484.
15. Bosnjak M, Tuten T. Classifying response behaviors in Web-based surveys. J Comput Mediat Commun. 2001;6(3).
16. Dillman D, Bowker D. The Web questionnaire challenge to survey methodologists. 2002. http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/zuma-paper-dillman- bowker.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2008.
17. Lozar-Manfreda K, Vehovar V. Do mail and Web surveys provide same results. 2002. Paper presented at: Development in Social Science Methodology Conference. http://mrvar.fdv.uni-lj.si/pub/mz/mz18/lozar1.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2008.
18. Dillman D, Tortora R, Bowker D. Influence of plain versus fancy design on response rate for Web surveys. 1998. Proceedings of Survey Methods Sections Annual Meeting of the American Statistical Association; Dallas, TX. http://survey.sesrc.wsu.edu/dillman/papers/asa98ppr.pdf. Accessed February 22, 2008.
19. Vehovar V, Lozar-Manfreda K. Design issues in Web survey. Proceeding of the Survey Research Methods Section. Alexandra, VA: American Statistical Association; 2000:983-988.
20. Couper M, Traugott M, Lamias M. Effective survey administration on the Web. Paper presented at: Midwest Association for Public Opinion Research Conference; 1999; Chicago, IL.
21. Dillman D, Christian L. Survey mode as a source of instability in responses across surveys. Field Meth. 2005;17:30-52.
22. Heerwegh D, Loosveldt G. Web surveys: the effect of controlling survey access using PIN numbers. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2002;20:10-21.
23. Crawford S, Couper M, Lamias M. Web survey: perceptions of burden. Soc Sci Comput Rev. 2001;19:146-162.
24. Bell DS, Kahn CE. Health status assessment via the World Wide Web. Proceedings of the American Medical Informatics Association Annual Fall Symposium. Washington, DC: American Medical Informatics Association; 1996:338-342.
25. Strickland O, Moloney M, Dietrich A, et al. Measurement issues related to data collection on the World Wide Web. Adv Nurs Sci. 2003;26:246-256.
26. Duffy M. The Internet as a research and dissemination resource. Health Promot Int. 2000;15:349-353.
27. Murff H, Kannfry J. Physician satisfaction with two order entry systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002;8(5):499-511.
28. Koppel R, Metly J, Cohen A, et al. Role of computerized physician order entry systems in facilitating medication errors. JAMA. 2005; 293(10):1179-1203.
29. Rozic-Hristovski A, Hristovski D, Todorovski L. Users' information-seeking behavior on a medical library Website. J Med Libr Assoc. 2002;90(2):210-217.
30. Müller H, Boyer C, Gaudinat A, et al. Analyzing Web log files of the health on the Net HONmedia search engine to define typical image search tasks for image retrieval evaluation. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2007;129(pt 2):1319-1323.
31. Cimino J, Li J, Mendonca E, et al. An evaluation of patient access to their electronic medical records via the World Wide Web. Proc AMIA Annu Symp. 2000:151-155.
32. Borgne-Uguen F, Goffpronost M, Trellu H, et al. 2007 Evaluation of the uses of medical records within a health assistance network. http://www.marsouin. org/article.php3?id-article=202. Accessed July 30, 2008.
33. Jalloh O, Waitman L. Improving computerized provider order entry (CPOE) usability by data mining users' queries from access logs. Proc AMIA Annu Symp. 2006:379-383.
34. Rosenbloom S, Geissbuhler A, Dupont W, et al. Effect of CPOE user interface design on user-initiated access to educational and patient information during clinical care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12:458-473.
35. Fanikos J, Fiumara K, Baroletti S, et al. Impact of smart infusion technology on administration of anticoagulants (unfractionated heparin, argatroban, lepirudin, and bivalirudin). Am J Cardiol. 2007;99(7):1002-1005.
36. Long AJ, Chang P, Li YC, et al. The use of a CPOE log for the analysis of physicians' behavior when responding to drug-duplication reminders. Int J Med Inform. 2008;77(8):499-506.
37. Florin J, Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M. Quality of nursing diagnoses: evaluation of an educational intervention. Int J Nurs Terminol Classif. 2005;16(2):33-43.
38. Daley E, McDermott R, Brown K, et al. Conducting Web-based research: a lesson in internet design. Am J Health Behav. 2003;27: 116-124.
39. Dillman D, Phelps G, Tortora R, et al. Response rate and measurement differences in mixed mode survey using mail, telephone, interactive voice response, and the Internet. Paper presented at: AAPOR Annual Conference; 2001; Montreal, Quebec; Canada.
40. Stanton J. An empirical assessment of data collection using the Internet. Pers Psychol. 1998;51:709-725.
41. Krosnick J, Chang L. 2001. A comparison of the random digit dialing telephone survey methodology with Internet survey methodology as implemented by Knowledge Networks and Harris Interactive. http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/ ganp/docs/OSUpaper.pdf. Accessed June 30, 2008.
42. Davis R. Web-based administration of a personality questionnaire: comparison with traditional methods. Behav Res Meth Instrum Comput. 1999;31:572-577.
43. Buchanan T, Smith J. Using the Internet for psychological research: personality testing on the World-Wide Web. Brit J Psychol. 1999;90: 125-144.
44. Jeavons A. Paradata: concepts and applications. Proceedings of the ESOMAR Worldwide Internet Conference Net Effects 4. Barcelona, Spain. The Netherlands: ESOMAR Publications; 2001.