A qualitative study of animation programming in the wild

ESEM 2010 - Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Dahotre, Aniket ^a   Zhang, Yan ^a   Scaffidi, Christopher ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

animation; collaboration; end user programming; repositories

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION TOOLS; CODE REUSE; COLLABORATION; CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK; DESIGN PATTERNS; END USER PROGRAMMERS; END-USER PROGRAMMING; FIELD STUDIES; LOW LEVEL; ONLINE COLLABORATION; PROGRAMMING ENVIRONMENT; PROGRAMMING SKILLS; QUALITATIVE STUDY; REPOSITORIES; TEACHING PROGRAMMING; TECHNICAL SKILLS;

ANIMATION; DESIGN; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING;

EID: 78149272660     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1852786.1852825     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Bogart, C., et al. 2008. End-user programming in the wild: A field study of CoScripter scripts. 2008 Symp. on Visual Lang. and Human-Centric Computing, 39-46.
2. Cooper, S., Dann, W., and Pausch, R. 2000. Developing algorithmic thinking with Alice. Information Sys. Educators Conf., 506-539.
3. Cottrell, R., Walker, R., and Denzinger. 2008. Semi-automating small-scale source code reuse via structural correspondence. 16th Intl. Symp. on Foundations of Software Engineering, 214-225.
4. Cypher, A., Smith, D, and Tessler, L. 2001. Novice programming comes of age. In Your Wish is My Command, Morgan Kaufmann, 7-20.
5. st Workshop on End-User Software Engineering, 47-51.
6. Gamma, E., et al. 1995. Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-oriented Software. Addison-Wesley Professional Computing Series.
7. Gestwicki, P. 2007. Computer games as motivation for design patterns. 38th SIGCSE Technical Symp. on Comp. Sci. Education, 233-237.
8. Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. 1967. The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research, Aldine Publishers.
9. th Intl. Conf. on Software Engineering, 447-457.
10. Kafai, Y., et al. 2008. Mentoring partnerships in a community technology center: A constructionist approach for fostering equitable service learning. Mentoring and Tutoring: Partnership in learning, 16, 2, 191-205.
11. Lanubile, F., and Visaggio, G. 1997. Extracting reusable functions by program slicing. Transactions on Software Engineering, 23, 4, 246-259.
12. th SIGCSE Technical Symp. on Comp. Sci. Education, 367-371.
13. Monroy-Hernández, A., and Resnick, M. 2008. Empowering kids to create and share programmable media. Interactions, 15, 2 (Mar-Apr 2008), 50-53.
14. Moskal, B., Lurie, D., and Cooper, S. 2004. Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach. ACM SIG-CSE Bulletin, 36, 1 (Mar 2004), 75-79.
15. Pane, J. 2002. A Programming System for Children that is Designed for Usability. PhD Dissertation, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon Univ..
16. Panko, R. 1998. What we know about spreadsheet errors. J. End User Computing, 10, 2, 15-21.
17. Papert, S. 1980. Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas, Basic Books, Inc.
18. Repenning, A. 1993. Agentsheets: A tool for building domain-oriented dynamic, visual environments. PhD Dissertation, Dept. of Computer Science, Univ. Colorado-Boulder.
19. Resnick, M., et al. 2009. Scratch: Programming for all. Communications of the ACM, 52, 11 (Nov 2009), 60-67.
20. http://scratch.mit.edu
21. Scaffidi, C., et al. 2009. Predicting reuse of end-user web macro scripts, 2009 Symp. on Visual Lang. and Human-Centric Computing, 93-100.