Evaluating the effectiveness of a new instructional approach

Proceedings of the SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 75-79

  Moskal, Barbara ^a   Lurie, Deborah ^b   Cooper, Stephen ^b  

^a Department of Geology and Geological Engineering   (United States)

^b SAINT JOSEPH S UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Animation; CS1; Evaluation; Pedagogy; Study; Visualization

Indexed keywords

ANIMATION; COMPUTER SCIENCE; CURRICULA; JAVA PROGRAMMING LANGUAGE; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING; STATISTICAL METHODS; STUDENTS; VISUALIZATION;

CS1; EVENT-DRIVEN PROGRAMMING; PEDAGOGY; STUDENT ATTITUDES;

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION;

EID: 2642563804     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/971300.971328     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Busch, T. (1995) Gender differences in self-efficacy and attitudes towards computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(2), 147-158.
2. Clark, V., and Chambers, S. (1989) Gender based factors in computing enrollments and achievement: evidence from a study of tertiary students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(4), 409-429.
3. Cohoon, J. (1999) Departmental differences can point the way to improving female retention in computer science. SIGCSE, 198-202.
4. Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2000) Alice: A 3-D tool for introductory programming concepts. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual CCSC Northeastern Conference 2000, Ramapo, NJ, April, 28-29, 2000.
5. Cooper, S., Dann, W., & Pausch, R. (2003) Using animated 3d graphics to prepare novices for CS1. Computer Science Education, 13(1).
6. th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Reno, NV, February, 191-195.
7. Dann, W., Cooper, S. & Pausch, R. (2000) Making the connection: Programming with animated small worlds. Proceedings of the 5th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Helsinki, Finland, July 11-13, 2000.
8. th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Canterbury, England,109-112.
9. th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Thessaloniki, Greece.
10. Dann, W., Cooper, S., & Pausch, R. (2004) Learning to Program with Alice. Prentice-Hall, to appear.
11. th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Helsinki, Finland, 136-139.
12. Division of Research, Evaluation and Communication, Directorate for Education and Human Resources. (1996) The Learning Curve: What We Are Discovering about U.S. Science and Mathematics Education. L. E. Suter (ed). Washington, DC:National Science Foundation,(NSF 96-53).
13. th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, Helsinki, Finland, 25-28.
14. Loyd, B. H. and Gressard, C. P. (1996) Computer attitude scale. Journal of Computing Research, 15(3), 241-259.
15. nd SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Charlotte, NC, 179-183.
16. Seymour, E. and Hewitt, N. (1997) Talking about leaving. Boulder: Westview Press.
17. Shashani, L. (1997) Gender differences in computer attitudes and use among college students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(1), 37-51.
18. http://www.sju.edu/~scooper/alicelec/alice.html