Inhibition of return exaggerates change blindness

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 63, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 2231-2238

  Smith, Daniel T ^a   Schenk, Thomas ^a  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; Awareness; Cueing; Inhibition of return; Subliminal

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PERCEPTIVE THRESHOLD; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AWARENESS; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INHIBITION (PSYCHOLOGY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORIENTATION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; SUBLIMINAL STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78149270643     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470211003592621     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Danziger, S., Fendrich, R., & Rafal, R. D. (1997). Inhibitory tagging of locations in the blind field of hemianopic patients. Consciousness and Cognition, 6(2-3), 291-307.
2. Folk, C. L., Remington, R. W., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(4), 1030-1044.
3. Harvey, N. (1980). Non-informative effects of stimuli functioning as cues. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 32, 413-425.
4. Ivanoff, J., & Klein, R. M. (2003). Orienting of attention without awareness is affected by measurementinduced attentional control settings. Journal of Vision, 3(1), 32-40.
5. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary vs reflexive control of the mind's eye's movement. In D. Baddeley (Ed.), Attention and Performance IX. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Klein, R. M. (1988). Inhibitory tagging system facilitates visual-search. Nature, 334(6181), 430-431.
7. Klein, R. M. (2000). Inhibition of return. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(4), 138-147.
8. Klein, R. M., & MacInnes, W. J. (1999). Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search. Psychological Science, 10(4), 346-352.
9. Lupianez, J., Milan, E. G., Tornay, F. J., Madrid, E., & Tudela, P. (1997). Does IOR occur in discrimination tasks? Yes, it does, but later. Perception & Psychophysics, 59(8), 1241-1254.
10. Lupianez, J., Ruz, M., Funes, M. J., & Milliken, B. (2007). The manifestation of attentional capture: Facilitation or IOR depending on task demands. Psychological Research-Psychologische Forschung, 71(1), 77-91.
11. Mack, A., & Rock, I. (1998). Inattentional blindness. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Mele, S., Savazzi, S., Marzi, C. A., & Berlucchi, G. (2008). Reaction time inhibition from subliminal cues: Is it related to inhibition of return? Neuropsychologia, 46(3), 810-819.
13. Mulckhuyse, M., Talsma, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2007). Grabbing attention without knowing: Automatic capture of attention by subliminal spatial cues. Visual Cognition, 15(7), 779-788.
14. Muller, H. J., & Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1989). Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual-attention: Time course of activation and resistance to interruption. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 315-330.
15. O'Regan, J. K., Rensink, R. A., & Clark, J. J. (1999). Change-blindness as a result of "mudsplashes" [Letter]. Nature, 398(6722), 34.
16. Posner, M. I., & Cohen, Y. (1984). Components of visual orienting. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance: X. Control of language processes (pp. 531-556). Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Ltd.
17. Posner, M. I., Rafal, R. D., Choate, L. S., & Vaughan, J. (1985). Inhibition of return-neural basis and function. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(3), 211-228.
18. Raymond, J. E., Shapiro, K. L., & Arnell, K. M. (1992). Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task-an attentional blink. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18(3), 849-860.
19. Rensink, R. A., O'Regan, J. K., & Clark, J. J. (1997). To see or not to see: The need for attention to perceive changes in scenes. Psychological Science, 8(5), 368-373.
20. Scholl, B. J. (2000). Attenuated change blindness for exogenously attended items in a flicker paradigm. Visual Cognition, 7(1-3), 377-396.
21. Simons, D. J., & Chabris, C. F. (1999). Gorillas in our midst: Sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception, 28(9), 1059-1074.
22. Simons, D. J., & Rensink, R. A. (2005). Change blindness: Past, present, and future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(1), 16-20.
23. Smith, D. T., & Schenk, T. (2008). Reflexive attention attenuates change blindness (but only briefly). Perception & Psychophysics, 70(3), 489-495.
24. Tassinari, G., Aglioti, S., Chelazzi, L., Peru, A., & Berlucchi, G. (1994). Do peripheral non-informative cues induce early facilitation of target detection. Vision Research, 34(2), 179-189.
25. Weiskrantz, L. (1986). Blindsight: A case study and implications. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.