Laws of attraction: From perceptual forces to conceptual similarity

IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1009-1016

  Ziemkiewicz, Caroline ^a   Kosara, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

cognition theory; laboratory studies; Perceptual cognition; visualization models

Indexed keywords

COGNITION THEORY; CONNECTING LINES; DATA RELATIONSHIPS; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; INTERPRETATION OF DATA; LABORATORY STUDIES; PERCEPTUAL COGNITION; POSITION ERRORS; RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN ENTITIES; SCATTER PLOTS; VISUAL ELEMENTS; VISUAL SIMILARITY; VISUALIZATION MODELS;

ERRORS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; VISUALIZATION;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 78149256589     PISSN: 10772626     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.174     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. R. Arnheim. The Power of the Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual Arts. UC Press, 1988.
2. C. Brewer and M. Harrower. ColorBrewer, http://www.colorbrewer.org/, 2002. Retrieved 12-4-2008.
3. C. A. Burbeck and S. M. Pizer. Object representation by cores: Identifying and representing primitive spatial regions. Vision Research, 35(13):1917-1930, 1995.
4. G. Ekman and K. Junge. Psychophysical relations in visual perception of length, area, and volume. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 2(1):1-10, 1961.
5. J. Freyd. The mental representation of movement when static stimuli are viewed. Perception & Psychophysics, 33(6):575-581, 1983.
6. J. Freyd. Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94(4):427-438, 1987.
7. J. Freyd, T. Pantzer, and J. Cheng. Representing statics as forces in equilibrium. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117:395-407, 1988.
8. J. J. Freyd and T. M. Pantzer. Static patterns moving in the mind. In S. M. Smith, T. B. Ward, and R. A. Finke, editors, The Creative Cognition Approach, pages 181-204. MIT Press, 1995.
9. J. Heer and M. Bostock. Crowdsourcing graphical perception: Using Mechanical Turk to assess visualization design. In Proceedings CHI, pages 203-212, 2010.
10. T. L. Hubbard. Target size and displacement along the axis of implied gravitational attraction: Effects of implied weight and evidence of representational gravity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 23(6):1484-1493, 1997.
11. A. Kittur, E. H. Chi, and B. Suh. Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In Proceedings CHI, pages 453-456, 2008.
12. W. Köhler. Gestalt Psychology. Liveright Publishing Company, 1947.
13. R. Kosara and C. Ziemkiewicz. Do Mechanical Turks dream of square pie charts? In BELIV Workshop, pages 373-382, 2010.
14. G. Robertson, R. Fernandez, D. Fisher, B. Lee, and J. Stasko. Effectiveness of animation in trend visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 14(6):1325-1332, 2008.
15. B. Tversky. Distortions in memory for visual displays. In S. R. Ellis and A. C. Grunwald, editors, Pictorial Communication in Virtual and Real Environments. CRC Press, 1991.
16. J. Zacks and B. Tversky. Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory & Cognition, 27(6):1073-1079, 1999.
17. C. Ziemkiewicz and R. Kosara. Implied dynamics in information visualization. In Advanced Visual Interfaces, pages 215-222, 2010.