Implied dynamics in information visualization

Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces AVI

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 215-222

  Ziemkiewicz, Caroline ^a   Kosara, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA POINTS; DESIGN ELEMENTS; DESIGN IMPLICATIONS; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

DESIGN; DYNAMICS; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; VISUALIZATION;

DATA VISUALIZATION;

EID: 77956110686     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1842993.1843031     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (19)

1. Amazon Mechanical Turk, http://aws.amazon.com/mturk/. Retrieved 10-16-2008.
2. R. Arnheim. Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. UC Press, 1974.
3. R. Arnheim. The Power of the Center: A Study of Composition in the Visual Arts. UC Press, 1988.
4. C. Brewer and M. Harrower. ColorBrewer, http://www.colorbrewer.org/, 2002. Retrieved 12-4-2008.
5. L. Elting, C. Martin, S. Cantor, and E. Rubenstein. Influence of data display formats on physician investigators' decisions to stop clinical trials: prospective trial with repeated measures. BMJ, 318:1527-1531, 1999.
6. J. Freyd. Dynamic mental representations. Psychological Review, 94(4):427-438, 1987.
7. J. Freyd, T. Pantzer, and J. Cheng. Representing statics as forces in equilibrium. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117:395-407, 1988.
8. J. J. Gibson. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, 1979.
9. T. Hubbard. Environmental invariants in the representation of motion: Implied dynamics and representational momentum, gravity, friction, and centripetal force. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2(3):322-338, 1995.
10. G. Lakoff and M. Johnson. Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press, 1980.
11. G. Lohse and E. Johnson. A comparison of two process tracing methods for choice tasks. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68:28-43, 1996.
12. M. Monroe. The apparent weight of color and correlated phenomena. The American Journal of Psychology, 36(2):192-206, 1925.
13. D. Norman. Affordance, conventions, and design. Interactions, 6(3):38-43, 1999.
14. D. Richardson, M. Spivey, L. Barsalou, and K. McRae. Spatial representations activated during real-time comprehension of verbs. Cognitive Science, 27:767-780, 2003.
15. J. Siskind. Grounding the lexical semantics of verbs in visual perception using force dynamics and event logic. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 15:31-90, 2001.
16. B. Tversky, J. Zacks, P. Lee, and J. Heiser. Lines, blobs, crosses and arrows: Diagrammatic communication with schematic figures. In Theory and Application of Diagrams, pages 221-230. Springer-Verlag, 2000.
17. C. Ware. Visual Thinking for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2008.
18. J. Zacks and B. Tversky. Bars and lines: A study of graphic communication. Memory & Cognition, 27(6):1073-1079, 1999.
19. C. Ziemkiewicz and R. Kosara. The shaping of information by visual metaphors. IEEE TVCG, 14(6):1269-1276, 2008.