The times ranking in the market for prestige university;El ranking times en el mercado del prestigio universitario

Perfiles Educativos

Volumn 32, Issue 129, 2010, Pages 8-28

  Ordorika, Imanol ^a   Gómez, Roberto Rodríguez ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Assessment; Competence; Prestige; Public policies; Universities; University rankings

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149252000     PISSN: 01852698     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Ackerman, David, Barbara L. Gross y Franck Vigneron (2009), Peer Observation Reports and Student Evaluations of Teaching: Who are the experts?, Alberta Journal of Educational Research, vol. 55, núm. 1, pp. 18-39.
2. Acosta Silva, Adrián (2000), Estado, políticas y universidades en un periodo de transición, México, Universidad de Guadalajara/Fondo de Cultura Económica.
3. Altbach, Philip G. (2006), The Dilemmas of Ranking, International Higher Education, núm. 42, en: http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/avp/soe/cihe/newsletter/Number42/p2_Altbach.htm
4. Berry, Colin (1999), University League Tables: Artefacts and inconsistencies in individual rankings, Higher Education Review, vol. 31, núm. 2, pp. 3-11.
5. Beyer, Janice M. y Rueben Snipper (1974), Objective Versus Subjective Indicators of Quality in Graduate Education, Sociology of Education, vol. 47, núm. 4, pp. 541-557.
6. Bolseguí, Milagros y Antonio Fuguet Smith (2006), Cultura de evaluación: una aproximación conceptual, Investigación y Postgrado, vol. 21, núm. 1, pp. 77-98.
7. Borgue Grady, Ernest y Kimberely Bingham Hall (2003), Quality and Accountability in Higher Education: Improving policy, enhancing performance, Westport, Conn., Praeger.
8. Bowden, Rachel (2000), Fantasy Higher Education: University and college league tables, Quality in Higher Education, núm. 6, pp. 41-60.
9. Brennan, John (2001), Quality Management, Power and Values in European Higher Education, en John C. Smart (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. 16, Kluwer Academic Publishers, pp. 119-145.
10. Brooks, Rachelle L. (2005), Measuring University Quality, Review of Higher Education, vol. 29, núm. 1, pp. 1-22.
11. Carnoy, Martin (en prensa), Prólogo, en Simon Marginson e Imanol Ordorika (en prensa), Hegemoni ́a en la era del conocimiento: competencia global en la educacio ́n superior y la investigacio ́n cienti ́fica, México, UNAM.
12. Cave, Martin, Stephen Hanney, Mary Henkel y Maurice Kogan (1997), The Use of Performance Indicators in Higher Education. The Challenge of the Quality Movement, Londres, Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
13. Clarke, Marguerite (2007), The Impact of Higher Education Rankings on Student Access, Choice and Opportunity, en IHEP (ed.), College and University Ranking Systems: Global perspectives and American challenges, Washington, D.C., Institute for Higher Education Policy, pp. 35-47.
14. Cuenin, Serge (1987), The Use of Performance Indicators in Universities: An international survey, International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, vol. 11, núm. 2, pp. 117-139.
15. Cyrenne, Philippe y Hugh Grant (2009), University Decision Making and Prestige: An empirical study, Economics of Education Review, vol. 28, núm. 2, pp. 237-248.
16. Díaz Barriga, Ángel, Concepción Barrón Tirado y Frida Díaz Barriga Arceo (2008), Impacto de la evaluación en la educación superior mexicana, México, UNAM-IISUE/Plaza y Valdés.
17. Dill, David y Maarja Soo (2005), Academic Quality, League Tables, and Public Policy: A crossnational analysis of University Ranking Systems, Higher Education Review, vol. 49, núm. 4, pp. 495-533.
18. Elliott, John (2002), La reforma educativa en el Estado evaluador, Perspectivas, vol. 32, núm. 3, pp. 1-20.
19. Espeland, Wendy Nelson y Michael Sauder (2007), Rankings and Reactivity: How public measures recreate social worlds, American Journal of Sociology, vol. 113, núm. 1, pp. 1-40.
20. Ewell, Peter T. (1999), Assessment of Higher Education Quality: Promise and Politics, en Messick, Samuel J. (ed.), Assessment in Higher Education: Issues of access, quality, student development, and public policy, Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 147-156.
21. Federkeil, Gero (2008), Rankings and Quality Assurance in Higher Education, Higher Education in Europe, vol. 33, núm. 2 y 3, pp. 219-231.
22. Filip, Marilena (ed.) (2004), Ranking and League Tables of Universities and Higher Education Institutions. Methodologies and approaches, Bucarest, UNESCO-CEPES, en: http://www.cepes.ro/publications/pdf/Ranking.pdf
23. Florian, Räzvan. V. (2007), Irreproducibility of the Results of the Shanghai Academic Ranking of World Universities, Scientometrics, vol. 72, núm. 1, pp. 25-32.
24. Hazelkorn, Ellen (2007), Impact and Influence of League Tables and Ranking Systems on Higher Education Decision-Making, Higher Education Management and Policy, vol. 19, núm. 2, pp. 87-110.
25. Hazelkorn, Ellen (2008), Learning to Live with League Tables and Ranking: The experience of institutional leaders, Higher Education Policy, vol. 21, núm. 2, pp. 193-215.
26. Hazelkorn, Ellen (2009), Rankings and the Battle for World-Class Excellence: Institutional strategies and policy choices, Higher Education Management and Policy, vol. 21, núm. 1, pp. 47-68.
27. Ince, Martin (2005), Are Rankings Relevant?, presentación powerpoint, en: http://quality.hau.gr/docs/proc_Ince_presentation.pdf.
28. Ince, Martin (2009), Times Higher Education, Leiden Rankings Conference, febrero 6 y 7, 2009, en: http://www.mediabank.leidenuniv.nl/ppt/ics/2009/2009ince_presentation.ppt.
29. Ishikawa, Mayumi (2009), University Rankings, Global Models, and Emerging Hegemony: Critical analysis from Japan, Journal of Studies in International Education, vol. 13, núm. 2, pp. 159-173.
30. Jaienski, Michael (2009), Garfield's Demon and 'Surprising' or 'Unexpected' Results in Science, Scientometrics, vol. 78, núm. 2, pp. 347-353.
31. Kogan, Maurice (ed.) (1989), Evaluating Higher Education. Papers from the International Journal of Institutional Management in Higher Education, París, OECD.
32. Long, Rebecca, Aleta Crawford, Michael White y Kimberly Davis (2009), Determinants of Faculty Research Productivity in Information Systems: An empirical analysis of the impact of academic origin and academic affiliation, Scientometrics, vol. 78, núm. 2, pp. 231-260.
33. Marginson, Simon (2007), Global University Rankings: Implications in general and for Australia, Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, vol. 29, núm. 2, pp. 131-142.
34. Marginson, Simon (2009), University Rankings, Government and Social Order: Managing the field of Higher Education according to the logic of the performative present-as-future, en Maarten Simons, Mark Olssen y Michael Peters (eds.), Re-reading Education Policies: Studying the policy agenda of the 21th Century, Rotterdam, Sense Publishers, pp. 2-16.
35. Marginson, Simon, Imanol Ordorika (en prensa), Hegemonía en la era del conocimiento: competencia global en la educación superior y la investigación científica, México, UNAM.
36. Marginson, Simon y Marijk Van der Wende (2006), To Rank or to be Ranked: The impact of global rankings in Higher Education, University of Twente-Centre for Higher Education Policy Studies, en: http://www.studiekeuzeenranking.leidenuniv.nl/content_docs/paper_marginson_van_der_wende.pdf
37. Mendoza Rojas Javier (2002), Transición en la educación superior contemporánea en México: de la planeación al Estado evaluador, México, UNAM-CESU/Miguel Ángel Porrúa.
38. Merisotis, Jamie y Jan Sadlak (2005), Higher Education Rankings: Evolution, acceptance, and dialogue, Higher Education in Europe, vol. 30, núm. 2, pp. 97-101.
39. Michael, Steve O. (2005), The Cost of Excellence. The Financial Implications of Institutional Rankings, International Journal of Educational Management, vol. 19, núm. 5, pp. 365-382.
40. Ordorika, Imanol, Francisco Javier Lozano Espinosa y Roberto Rodríguez Gómez (2009), Las revistas de investigación de la UNAM: un panorama general, Cuadernos de Trabajo de la Dirección General de Evaluación Institucional, año 1, núm. 4.
41. Ordorika, Imanol y Brian Pusser (2007), La Máxima Casa de Estudios: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México as a State-Building University, World Class Worldwide: Trasnformating research universities in Asia and America, editado por P.G. Altbach y J. Balán, Baltimore, Md. Johns Hopkings University Press, pp. 189-215.
42. Ordorika, Imanol y Roberto Rodríguez Gómez (2008), Comentarios al Academic Ranking of World Universities 2008, Cuadernos de Trabajo de la Dirección General de Evaluación Institucional, año 1, núm.1.
43. Palomba, Catherine A. y Trudy W. Banta (1999), Assessment Essentials: Planning, implementing and improving assessment in Higher Education, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
44. Power, Michael (1997), The Audit Society, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
45. Provan, David y Karen Abercromby (2000), University League Tables and Rankings: A critical analysis, Commonwealth Higher Education Management Service (CHEMS), documento núm. 30, en:htpp://www.acu.ac.uk/chems/onlinepublications/976798333.pdf
46. Puiggrós, Adriana y Pedro Krotsch (comp.) (1994), Universidad y evaluación. Estado del debate, Buenos Aires, Aique Grupo Editor/Rei Argentina/Instituto de Estudios y Acción Social.
47. Roberts, David y Lisa Thomson (2007), Reputation Management for Universities: University league tables and the impact on student recruitment, Reputation Management for Universities, Working Paper Series, núm. 2, Leeds, The Knowledge Partnership.
48. Rowley, Daniel J., Herman D. Lujan y Michael G. Dolence (1997), Strategic Change in Colleges and Universities: Planning to Survive and Prosper, San Francisco, Jossey-Bass.
49. Salmi, Jamil y Alenoush Saroyan (2007), League Tables as Policy Instruments: Uses and misuses, Higher Education Management and Policy, vol. 19, núm. 2, pp. 24-62.
50. Sanoff, Alvin P. (1998), Rankings are Here to Stay: Colleges can improve them, Chronicle of Higher Education, vol. 45, núm. 2, en: http://chronicle.com/
51. Siganos, André (2008), Rankings, Governance, and Attractiveness of Higher Education: The new French context, Higher Education in Europe, vol. 33, núm. 2-3, pp. 311-316.
52. Strathern, Marilyn (2000), The Tyranny of Transparency, British Educational Research Journal, vol. 26, núm. 3, pp. 309-321.
53. Thakur, Marian (2008), The Impact of Ranking Systems on Higher Education and its Stakeholders, Journal of Institutional Research, vol. 13, núm. 1, pp. 83-96.
54. Turner, David R. (2005), Benchmarking in Universities: League tables revisited, Oxford Review of Education, vol. 31, núm. 3, pp. 353-371.
55. Usher, Alex y Massimo Savino (2006), A World of Difference: A global survey of University League Tables, Canadian Education Report Series, en: http://www.educationalpolicy.org/pdf/World-of-Difference-200602162.pdf
56. Van Raan, Anthony F.J. (2007), Challenges in the Ranking of Universities, en J. Sadlak y Nan Cai Liu (eds.), The World-Class University and Ranking: Aiming beyond status, Bucarest, UNESCO-CEPES/Shanghai Jiao Tong University/Cluj University Press, pp. 87-121.
57. Villaseñor García Guillermo (2003), La evaluación de la educación superior: su función social, Reencuentro, núm. 36, pp. 20-29.
58. Webster, David S. (1986), Academic Quality Rankings of American Colleges and Universities, Springfield, Charles C. Thomas.
59. Ying, Yu y Zhang Jingao (2009), An Empirical Study on Credibility of China's University Rankings: A case study of three rankings, Chinese Education and Society, vol. 42, núm. 1, pp. 70-80.