Research for design: Exploring student and instructor attitudes toward accessing library resources and services from course management systems (CMS)

Communications in Information Literacy

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 29-60

  McLure, Merinda ^a   Munro, Karen ^b  

^a Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78149246261     PISSN: 19335954     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.15760/comminfolit.2010.4.1.87     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Agee, A. S., Yang, C., & the 2009 EDUCAUSE Current Issues Survey Committee (2009). Top-ten IT issues 2009. EDUCAUSE Review, 44(4), 44-59. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0943.pdf
2. Barr, H., Gower, B., & Clayton, J. (2008). Faculty response to the implementation of an open source learning management system in three tertiary institutions in New Zealand. Computers in the Schools, 24(3/4), 125-137.
3. Camp, J. S., & DeBlois, P. B. (2007). Current issues survey report, 2007. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 30(2), 12-31. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/EQM0723.pdf
4. Caruso, J. B. (2006). Measuring student experiences with course management systems. EDUCAUSE Research Bulletin, 19. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/library/ERB0619
5. Collard, S., & Tempelman-Kluit, N. (2007). The other way in: Goal-based library content through CMS. Internet Reference Services Quarterly, 11(4), 55-68.
6. Colorado State University, Institutional Research. (2008). Facts at a glance 2008-2009. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://www.ir.colostate.edu/pdf/mfb/mini0809.pdf
7. Gibbons, S. (2005). Library coursemanagement systems: An overview [Issue]. Library Technology Reports, 41(3).
8. Hammoud, L., Love, S., Baldwin, L., & Chen, S. Y. Evaluating WebCT use in relation to students' attitude and performance. (2008). International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education, 4(2), 26-43.
9. Hightower, B., Rawl, C., & Schutt, M. (2008). Collaborations for delivering the library to students through WebCT. Reference Services Review, 35(4), 541-551.
10. Jackson, P. A. (2007). Integrating information literacy into Blackboard: building campus partnerships for successful student learning. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 33(4), 454-461.
11. Jafari, A., McGee, P., & Carmean, C. (2006). Managing courses, defining learning: What faculty, students, and administrators want. EDUCAUSE Review, 41(4), 50-71. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/ERM0643.pdf
12. Landry, B. J. L., Griffeth, R., & Hartman, S. (2006). Measuring student perceptions of Blackboard using the Technology Acceptance Model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(1), 87-99.
13. Lonn, S., & Teasley, S. D. (2009). Saving time or innovating practice: Investigating perceptions and uses of Learning Management Systems. Computers & Education, 53, 686-694.
14. Malikowski, S. R. (2008). Factors rel[a]ted to breadth of use in course management systems. Internet & Higher Education, 11 (2), 81-86.
15. Matthew, V., & Schroeder, A. (2006). The embedded librarian program: Faculty and librarians partner to embed personalized library assistance into online courses. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, 29(4), 61-65. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm06410.pdf
16. Moulaison, H. L., & Corrado, E. M. (2007). Analog v. Google in the CMS: RSS feeds to the rescue! In H. A. Thompson (Ed.), Sailing into the Future: Charting Our Destiny. Proceedings of the Thirteenth National Conference of the Association of College and Research Libraries, March 29 - April 1, 2007, Baltimore, Maryland (pp. 158-166). Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries.
17. Piña, A. A. (2007). Course management systems: Overview and implications for libraries. Library Hi Tech News, 24(5), 7-9.
18. Rieger, O. Y., Horne, A. K., & Revels, I. (2004). Linking course web sites to library collections and services. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 30(3), 205-211.
19. Salaway, G., & Caruso, J. B. (2007). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2007 (Volume 6). EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ECAR/TheECARStudyofUndergraduateStu/161967
20. Smith, S. D., Salaway, G., & Caruso, J. B. (2009). The ECAR study of undergraduate Students and information technology, 2009 (Volume 6). EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ecar/TheECARStudyofUndergraduateStu/187215
21. Solis, J., & Hampton, E. M. (2009). Promoting a comprehensive view of library resources in a course management system. New Library World, 110(1/2), 81-91.
22. University of California, Berkeley. (2008). Facts at a glance. Retrieved December 29, 2009, from http://berkeley.edu/about/fact.shtml
23. Washburn, A. (2008). Finding the library in Blackboard: An assessment of library integration. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 4(3), 301-316. Retrieved December 28, 2009, from http://jolt.merlot.org/vol4no3/washburn_0908.pdf
24. West, R. E., Waddoups, G., & Graham, C. R. (2007). Understanding the experiences of instructors as they adopt a course management system. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55 (1), 1-26.
25. York, A. C., & Vance, J. M. (2009). Taking library instruction into the online classroom: Best practices for embedded librarians. Journal of Library Administration, 49, 197-209.