Subjective values of different treatments for missing molars in older Japanese

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 37, Issue 12, 2010, Pages 892-899

  Ikebe, K ^a   Hazeyama, T ^a   Kagawa, R ^a   Matsuda, K ^a   Maeda, Y ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Cantilever fixed dental prosthesis; Implant; Missing molars; Removable partial denture prosthesis; Shortened dental arch; Subjective value; Treatment options; Visual analogue scale

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CHROMIUM DERIVATIVE;

AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHEMISTRY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; ECONOMICS; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; INDEPENDENT LIVING; JAPAN; MALE; MASTICATION; MOLAR TOOTH; PAIN; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERIODONTAL DISEASE; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; SEX DIFFERENCE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ACRYLIC RESINS; AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHROMIUM ALLOYS; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTURE DESIGN; DENTURE, PARTIAL; DENTURE, PARTIAL, FIXED; DENTURE, PARTIAL, REMOVABLE; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; INDEPENDENT LIVING; JAPAN; JAW, EDENTULOUS, PARTIALLY; MALE; MASTICATION; MOLAR; PAIN; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; SEX FACTORS; TOOTH LOSS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78149231971     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: 13652842     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02123.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Kay E, Nuttall N. Clinical decision making - an art or a science? Part V: patient preferences and their influence on decision making Br Dent J. 1995;178:229-233.
2. Locker D. Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health. 1988;5:3-18.
3. Kay EJ, Nuttall NM, Knill-Jones R. Restorative treatment thresholds and agreement in treatment decision-making. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1992;20:265-268.
4. Lane DA. Utility, decision, and quality of life. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:585-591.
5. Torrance GW. Utility approach to measuring health-related quality of life. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:593-603.
6. Rohlin M, Mileman PA. Decision analysis in dentistry - the last 30 years. J Dent. 2000;28:453-468.
7. Zarb GA, MacKay HF. The partially edentulous patient. I. The biologic price of prosthodontic intervention. Aust Dent J. 1980;25:63-68.
8. Berg E. Periodontal problems associated with use of distal extension removable partial dentures--a matter of construction? J Oral Rehabil. 1985;12:369-379.
9. MacEntee MI. Biologic sequelae of tooth replacement with removable partial dentures: a case for caution. J Prosthet Dent. 1993;70:132-134.
10. Wostmann B, Budtz-Jorgensen E, Jepson N, Mushimoto E, Palmqvist S, Sofou A et al. Indications for removable partial dentures: a literature review. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18:139-145.
11. Witter DJ, De Haan AF, Kayser AF, Van Rossum GM. A 6-year follow-up study of oral function in shortened dental arches. Part I: occlusal stability. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21:113-125.
12. Witter DJ, De Haan AF, Kayser AF, Van Rossum GM. A 6-year follow-up study of oral function in shortened dental arches. Part II: craniomandibular dysfunction and oral comfort. J Oral Rehabil. 1994;21:353-366.
13. Nassani MZ, Devlin H, McCord JF, Kay EJ. The shortened dental arch - an assessment of patients' dental health state utility values. Int Dent J. 2005;55:307-312.
14. Korduner EK, Soderfeldt B, Kronstrom M, Nilner K. Attitudes toward the shortened dental arch concept among Swedish general dental practitioners. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:171-176.
15. Ikebe K, Hazeyama T, Ogawa T, Kagawa R, Matsuda K, Wada M et al. Subjective values of different age groups in Japan regarding treatment for missing molars. Gerodontology. Doi:
16. Ikebe K, Nokubi T, Ettinger RL, Namba H, Tanioka N, Iwase K et al. Dental status and satisfaction with oral function in a sample of community-dwelling elderly people in Japan. Spec Care Dentist. 2002;22:33-40.
17. Walton JN, MacEntee MI. Choosing or refusing oral implants: a prospective study of edentulous volunteers for a clinical trial. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18:483-488.
18. Kayser AF, Witter DJ, Spanauf AJ. Overtreatment with removable partial dentures in shortened dental arches. Aust Dent J. 1987;32:178-182.
19. Torabinejad M, Anderson P, Bader J, Brown LJ, Chen LH, Goodacre CJ et al. Outcomes of root canal treatment and restoration, implant-supported single crowns, fixed partial dentures, and extraction without replacement: a systematic review. J Prosthet Dent. 2007;98:285-311.
20. Kanno T, Carlsson GE. A review of the shortened dental arch concept focusing on the work by the Kayser/Nijmegen group. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33:850-862.
21. Witter DJ, Allen PF, Wilson NH, Kayser AF. Dentists' attitudes to the shortened dental arch concept. J Oral Rehabil. 1997;24:143-147.
22. Allen PF, Witter DF, Wilson NH, Kayser AF. Shortened dental arch therapy: views of consultants in restorative dentistry in the United Kingdom. J Oral Rehabil. 1996;23:481-485.
23. De Sa e Frias V, Toothaker R, Wright RF. Shortened dental arch: a review of current treatment concepts. Int J Prosthodont. 2004;13:104-110.
24. Strassburger C, Kerschbaum T, Heydecke G. Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: a literature review. Part 2: qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. Int J Prosthodont. 2006;19:339-348.
25. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. School Education (Summary Tables) Enrollment and Advancement Rate, 1948 to 2005. Available at:, accessed 3 May 2010.
26. Graham R, Mihaylov S, Jepson N, Allen PF, Bond S. Determining "need" for a Removable Partial Denture: a qualitative study of factors that influence dentist provision and patient use. Br Dent J. 2006;200:155-158.