Growing amago and rainbow trout in duoculture with self-feeding systems: Implications for production and welfare

Aquaculture

Volumn 309, Issue 1-4, 2010, Pages 137-142

  Flood, Matthew J ^a   Noble, Chris ^b   Kagaya, Rem ^a   Damsgård, Børge ^b   Purser, G John ^c   Tabata, Mitsuo ^a  

^a TEIKYO UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE   (Japan)

^b NOFIMA   (Norway)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TASMANIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Amago; Duoculture; Production; Rainbow trout; Self feeding; Welfare

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FISHERY PRODUCTION; GROWTH RATE; MONOCULTURE; SALMONID; WELFARE ECONOMICS;

ONCORHYNCHUS; ONCORHYNCHUS MASOU MASOU; ONCORHYNCHUS MYKISS; ONCORHYNCHUS RHODURUS; SALMONIDAE;

EID: 78049527456     PISSN: 00448486     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2010.09.031     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Adron J.W., Grant P.T., Cowey C.B. System for quantitative study of learning capacity of rainbow trout and its application to study of food preferences and behavior. J. Fish Biol. 1973, 5:625-636.
2. Alanärä A. Demand-feeding as a self-regulating feeding system for rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss in net-pens. Aquaculture 1992, 108:347-356.
3. Alanärä A. The effect of temperature, dietary energy content and reward level on the demand feeding activity of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquaculture 1994, 126:349-359.
4. Alanärä A. The use of self-feeders in rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) production. Aquaculture 1996, 145:1-20.
5. Bailey J., Alanara A. A test of a feed budget model for rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Aquac. Res. 2001, 32:465-469.
6. Beacham T.D. Competition between juvenile pink (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha) and chum salmon (Oncorhynchus keta) and its effect on growth and survival. Can. J. Zool. 1993, 71:1270-1274.
7. Bégout Anras M.L., Beauchaud M., Juell J.E., Covés D., Lagardére J.P. Environmental factors and feed intake: rearing systems. Food Intake in Fish 2001, 157-188. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford. D. Houlihan, T. Boujard, M. Jobling (Eds.).
8. Blyth P.J., Purser G.J., Russell J.F. Detection of feeding rhythms in seacaged Atlantic salmon using new feeder technology. Fish Farming Technology 1993, 209-216. Balkema, Rotterdam. H. Reinertsen, L.A. Dahle, L. Jørgensen, K. Tvinnereim (Eds.).
9. Bolliet V., Aranda A., Boujard T. Demand feeding rhythm in rainbow trout and European catfish - synchronisation by photoperiod and food availability. Physiol. Behav. 2001, 73:625-633.
10. Boujard T., Leatherland J.F. Demand feeding behavior and diel pattern of feeding activity in Oncorhynchus mykiss held under different photoperiod regimes. J. Fish Biol. 1992, 40:535-544.
11. Brown C., Laland K.N. Social learning in fishes: a review. Fish Fish. 2003, 4:280-288.
12. Brown C., Markula A., Laland K. Social learning of prey location in hatchery-reared Atlantic salmon. J. Fish Biol. 2003, 63:738-745.
13. Carter C.G., McCarthy I.D., Houlihan D.F. Food consumption, feeding behaviour, and growth of triploid and diploid Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar L., parr. Can. J. Zool. 1994, 72:609-617.
14. Carter C.G., Purser G.J., Houlihan D.F., Thomas P. The effect of decreased ration on feeding hierarchies in groups of greenback flounder (Rhombosolea tapirina: Teleostei). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 1996, 76:505-516.
15. Ellis T., North B., Scott A.P., Bromage N.R., Porter M., Gadd D. The relationships between stocking density and welfare in farmed rainbow trout. J. Fish Biol. 2002, 61:493-531.
16. Grant J.W.A. Whether or not to defend? The influence of resource distribution. Mar. Behav. Physiol. 1993, 23:137-153.
17. Holm J.C. Monoculture and duoculture of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus). Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 1989, 46:697-704.
18. Huntingford F.A., Adams C., Braithwaite V.A., Kadri S., Pottinger T.G., Sandoe P., Turnbull J.F. Current issues in fish welfare. J. Fish Biol. 2006, 68:332-372.
19. Jobling M., Koskela J., Pirhonen J. Feeding time, feed intake and growth of Baltic salmon, Salmo salar, and brown trout, Salmo trutta, reared in monoculture and duoculture at constant low temperature. Aquaculture 1998, 163:73-84.
20. Karakatsouli N., Papafotiou P., Papoutsoglou S.E. Mono- and duoculture of juvenile sharpsnout seabream Diplodus puntazzo (Cetti) and gilthead seabream Sparus aurata L. in a recirculated water system. Aquac. Res. 2006, 37:1654-1661.
21. Karplus I., Zion B., Rosenfeld L., Grinshpun Y., Slosman T., Goshen Z., Barki A. Social facilitation of learning in mixed-species schools of common carp Cyprinus carpio L. and Nile tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (L.). J. Fish Biol. 2007, 71:1023-1034.
22. Keenleyside M.H.A., Yamamoto F.T. Territorial behaviour of juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L.). Behaviour 1962, 19:139-169.
23. Landless P.J. Demand-feeding behaviour of rainbow trout. Aquaculture 1976, 7:11-25.
24. MacLean A., Metcalfe N.B., Mitchell D. Alternative competitive strategies in juvenile Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): evidence from fin damage. Aquaculture 2000, 184:291-302.
25. Magnhagen C., Staffan F. Social learning in young-of-the-year perch encountering a novel food type. J. Fish Biol. 2003, 63:824-829.
26. Mizusawa K., Noble C., Suzuki K., Tabata M. Effect of light intensity on self-feeding of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss reared individually. Fish. Sci. 2007, 73:1001-1006.
27. Mork O.I. Growth of 3 salmonid species in mono and double culture (Salmo salar L, Salmo trutta L and Salmo gairdneri Rich). Aquaculture 1982, 27:141-147.
28. Noble C., Mizusawa K., Tabata M. Does light intensity affect self-feeding and food wastage in group-held rainbow trout and white-spotted charr?. J. Fish Biol. 2005, 66:1387-1399.
29. Noble C., Mizusawa K., Suzuki K., Tabata M. The effect of differing self-feeding regimes on the growth, behaviour and fin damage of rainbow trout held in groups. Aquaculture 2007, 264:214-222.
30. Noble C., Mizusawa K., Tabata M. The effect of trigger depth on self-feeder utilisation, growth and the vertical distribution of tank-held rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). Aquaculture 2007, 273:64-70.
31. Nortvedt R., Holm J.C. Atlantic Salmon in duoculture with Arctic Charr - decreased aggression enhances growth and stocking density potential. Aquaculture 1991, 98:355-361.
32. Paspatis M., Batarias C., Tiangos P., Kentouri M. Feeding and growth response of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) reared by four feeding methods. Aquaculture 1999, 175:293-305.
33. Sakakura Y., Tagawa M., Tsukamoto K. Whole-body cortisol concentrations and ontogeny of aggressive behaviour in yellowtail (Seriola quinqueradiata Temminck and Schlegel: Carangidae). Gen. Comp. Endocr. 1998, 109:286-292.
34. Sánchez-Vázquez F.J., Tabata M. Circadian rhythms of demand feeding and locomotor activity in rainbow trout. J. Fish Biol. 1998, 52:255-267.
35. Suzuki K., Mizusawa K., Noble C., Tabata M. The growth, feed conversion ratio and fin damage of rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss under self-feeding and hand-feeding regimes. Fish. Sci. 2008, 74:941-943.
36. Underwood A.J. Experiments in Ecology. Their Logical Design and Interpretation Using Analysis of Variance 1997, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 504 pp.
37. Vilhunen S., Hirvonen H., Laakkonen M.V.M. Less is more: social learning of predator recognition requires a low demonstrator to observer ratio in Arctic charr (Salvelinus alpinus). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2005, 57:275-282.
38. Wedemeyer G.A. Physiology of Fish in Intensive Culture Systems 1996, Chapman & Hall, New York, 232 pp.