Defining new categories of pregnancy intention in African-American women

Women's Health Issues

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 371-379

  Schwartz, Alan ^a   Peacock, Nadine ^a   Mcrae, Kenya ^a   Seymour, Rachel ^a   Gilliam, Melissa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CONCEPTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; PREDICTION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; REPRODUCTIVE PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; SOCIAL SUPPORT; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICANS; AGE FACTORS; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FAMILY PLANNING SERVICES; FEMALE; FORECASTING; HUMANS; INTENTION; POVERTY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY, UNPLANNED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TIME FACTORS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049527168     PISSN: 10493867     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abma J., Chandra A., Mosher W.D., Peterson L., Piccinino L. Fertility, family planning, and women's health: new data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital and Health Statistics 1997, 23.
2. Abma J., Sonenstein F., Stater F. Sexual activity and contraceptive practices among teenagers in the United States, 1988 and 1995 2001, US Dept. of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics; for sale by USGPO.
3. Afable-Munsuz A., Speizer I., Magnus J.H., Kendall C. A positive orientation toward early motherhood is associated with unintended pregnancy among New Orleans youth. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2006, 10:265-276.
4. Barrett G., Smith S.C., Wellings K. Conceptualisation, development, and evaluation of a measure of unplanned pregnancy. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 2004, 58:426-433.
5. Barrett G., Wellings K. Understanding pregnancy intentions: A problem in evidence everywhere. Family Planning Perspectives 2000, 32:194.
6. Brown S.R. Political subjectivity: Applications of Q methodology in political science 1980, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT.
7. Chandra A., Martinez G.M., Mosher W.D., Abma J.C., Jones J. Fertility, family planning, and reproductive health of U.S. women: data from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth. Vital Health Statistics 2005, 23:1-160.
8. Cheng B., Schwarz E.B., Douglas E., Horon I. Unintended pregnancy and associated maternal preconception, prenatal and postpartum behaviors. Contraception 2009, 79:194-198.
9. Chuang C.H., Weisman C.S., Hillemeier M.M., Camacho F.T., Dyer A. Women's Health Issues 2009, 19:159-166.
10. Cross R.M. Exploring attitudes: the case for Q methodology. Health Education Research 2005, 20:206-213.
11. David A.G. Forgettable contraception. Contraception 2009, 80:497-499.
12. Dittus P.J., Jacard J. Adolescents' perceptions of maternal disapproval of sex: Relationship to sexual outcomes. Journal of Adolescent Health 2000, 26:268-278.
13. Fabrigar L., Wegener D., MacCallum R., Strahan E. Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods 1999, 4:272-299.
14. Finer L., Henshaw S. Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2006, 38:90-96.
15. Foster D.G., Biggs M.A., Ralph L.J., Arons A., Brindis C.D. Reproductive intentions among individuals seeking reproductive health care. Women's Health Issues 2008, 18:351-359.
16. Hamilton B., Martin J., Ventura S.J. Births: preliminary data for 2006. National Vital Statistics Reports 2007, 56.
17. Hamilton B., Martin J., Ventura S. Births: preliminary data for 2007. National Vital Statistics Reports 2009, 57:1-5.
18. Hardin J.W., Hilbe J. Generalized estimating equations 2003, Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
19. Hoffman S. By the numbers: The public costs of teen childbearing 2006, National Campaign to Prevent Teen Pregnancy.
20. Joyce T., Kaestner R., Korenman S. The stability of pregnancy intentions and pregnancy-related maternal behaviors. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2000, 4:171-178.
21. Kaufmann R., Morris L., Spitz A. Comparison of two question sequences for assessing pregnancy intentions 1997, Vol. 145. Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 810-816.
22. Kost K., Landry D., Darroch J. The effects of pregnancy planning status on birth outcomes and infant care. Family Planning Perspectives 1998, 30:223-230.
23. Lee P.R., Stewart F.H. Editorial: failing to prevent unintended pregnancy is costly. American Journal of Public Health 1995, 85:479-480.
24. Lopez L., Steiner M., Grimes D., Schulz K. Strategies for communicating contraceptive effectiveness. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, 2.
25. McKeown B.F., Thomas D.B. Q methodology 1988, Vol. 66. Sage, Newbury Park, CA.
26. Miller W.B. Relationships between the intendedness of conception and the wantedness of pregnancy. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease 1974, 159:396-406.
27. National Center for Health Statistics. (2002, March 20). NSFG Cycle 6, Main Study, Female Questionnaire, Section G. Available: http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nsfg/GfemC6CRQ.pdf.
28. Niemeyer S., Petts J., Hobson K. Rapid climate change and society: Assessing responses and thresholds. Risk Analysis 2005, 25:1443-1456.
29. Poole V., Flowers J., Goldenberg R., Cliver S., McNeal S. Changes in intendedness during pregnancy in a high-risk multiparous population. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2000, 4:179-182.
30. Postlethwaite D., Armstrong M., Hung Y., Shaber R. Pregnancy outcomes by pregnancy intention in a managed care setting. Maternal and Child Health Journal 2009, 14:227-234.
31. Sable M., Spencer J., Stockbauer J., Schramm W., Howell V., Herman A. Pregnancy wantedness and adverse pregnancy outcomes: differences by race and Medicaid status. Family Planning Perspectives 1997, 29:76-81.
32. Santelli J.S., Lindberg L.D., Orr M.G., Finer L.B., Speizer I. Toward a multidimensional measure of pregnancy intentions: evidence from the United States. Studies in Family Planning 2009, 40:87-100.
33. Santelli J.S., Rochat R., Hatfield-Timajchy K., Gilbert B., Curtis K., Cabral R., et al. The measurement and meaning of unintended pregnancy. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2003, 35:94-101.
34. Schmolck P. PQMethod (Version 2.11) 2000, University of the Bundeswehr, Munich.
35. Schoen R., Astone N., Kim Y., Nathanson C., Fields J. Do fertility intentions affect fertility behavior?. Journal of Marriage and the Family 1999, 61:790-799.
36. Speizer I.S., Santelli J.S., Afable-Munsuz A., Kendall C. Measuring factors underlying intendedness of women's first and later pregnancies. Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 2004, 36:198-205.
37. Stephenson W. The study of behavior: Q technique and its methodology 1953, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
38. Trussell J., Vaughan B., Stanford J. Are all contraceptive failures unintended pregnancies? Evidence from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. Family Planning Perspectives 1999, 31:246-260.
39. Ventura S., Mosher W., Curtin S., Abma J., Henshaw S. Trends in pregnancies and pregnancy rates by outcome: estimates for the United States, 1976-96. Vital and health statistics. Series 21, Data on Natality, Marriage, and Divorce 2000, 21:1.