As time goes by: Stakeholder opinions on the implementation and use of a virtual patient simulation system

Medical Teacher

Volumn 32, Issue 11, 2010, Pages

  Botezatu, Mihaela ^a   Hult, Håkan ^a   Tessma, Mesfin Kassaye ^a   Fors, Uno G H ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COLOMBIA; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; HUMAN; INTERNET; PATIENT CARE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SWEDEN;

COLOMBIA; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT CARE; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; SWEDEN; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 78049516957     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.519066     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Cook DA. 2009. The failure of e-learning research to inform educational practice, and what we can do about it. Med Teach 31(2):158-162.
2. Cook DA, Triola MM. 2009. Virtual patients: A critical literature review and proposed next steps. Med Edu 43(4):303-311.
3. Creswell JW. 2003. Research design: Qualitative, and quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. London, New Delhi: Sage.
4. Ellaway RH, Poulton T, Smothers V, Greene P. 2009. Virtual patients come of age. Med Teach 31(8):683-684.
5. Fall LH, Berman NB, Smith S, White CB, Woodhead JC, Olson AL. 2005. Multi-institutional development and utilisation of a computer-assisted learning programme for the paediatrics clerkship: The CLIPP project. Acad Med 80:847-855.
6. Fors U, Muntean V, Botezatu M, Zary N. 2009. Cross-cultural use and development of virtual patients. Med Teach 31(8):732-738.
7. Haag M, Singer R, Bauch M, Heid J, Hess F, Leven FJ. 2007. Challenges and perspectives of computer-assisted instruction in medical education: Lessons learned from 7 years of experience with the CAMPUS system. Methods Inf Med 46:67-69.
8. Huang G, Reynolds R, Candler C. 2007. Virtual patient simulation at US and Canadian medical schools. Acad Med 82:446-451.
9. Huwendiek S, Reichert F, Bosse HM, de Leng BA, van der Vleuten CP, Haag M, Hoffmann GF, Tönshoff B. 2009. Design principles for virtual patients: A focus group study among students. Med Educ 43(6):580-588.
10. Issenberg SB. 2006. The scope of simulation-based healthcare education. Simul Healthc 1:203-208.
11. McLaughlin S, Fitch MT, Goyal DG, Hayden E, Kauh CY, Laack TA, Nowicki T, Okuda Y, Palm K, Pozner CN, et al. 2008. Simulation in graduate medical education (2008): A review for emergency medicine. Acad Emerg Med 15(11):1117-1129.
12. Round J, Conradi E, Poulton T. 2009. Training staff to create simple interactive virtual patients: The impact on a medical and healthcare institution. Med Teach 8:764-769.
13. Steinert Y, Mann K, Centeno A, Dolmans D, Spencer J, Gelula M, Prideaux D. 2006. A systematic review of faculty development initiatives designed to improve teaching effectiveness in medical education: BEME Guide No. 8. Med Teach 28(6):497-526.
14. Tworek J, Coderre S, Wright B, McLaughlin K. 2010. Virtual Patients: ED-2 band-aid or valuable asset in the learning portfolio? Acad Med 85(1):155-158.
15. Zary N, Johnson G, Boberg J, Fors U. 2006. Development, implementation and pilot evaluation of a web-based virtual patient case simulation environment-Web-SP. BMC Med Educ 6:10.