Analysis of the Content of Configural Representations: The Role of Associatively Evoked and Trace Memories

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 501-505

  Lin, Tzu Ching E ^a   Honey, R C ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Configural learning; Memory; Trace conditioning

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION; RAT; RECOGNITION;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; CONCEPT FORMATION; DISCRIMINATION LEARNING; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; RATS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SET (PSYCHOLOGY);

RATTUS;

EID: 78049505286     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0018348     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Allman M.J., Honey R.C. Transfer of configural learning between the components of a preexposed stimulus compound: Implications for elemental and configural models of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2006, 32:307-313.
2. Brandon S.E., Vogel E.H., Wagner A.R. Stimulus representation in SOP: I: Theoretical rationalization and some implications. Behavioural Processes 2003, 62:5-25.
3. Brogden W.J. Sensory pre-conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1939, 25:323-332.
4. Dickinson A., Burke J. Within-compound associations mediate the retrospective revaluation of causality judgements. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1996, 49(B):60-80.
5. Dwyer D., Mackintosh N.J., Boakes R.A. Simultaneous activation of the representations of absent cues results in the formation of an excitatory association between them. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 1998, 24:1-9.
6. Hall G. Learning about associatively activated stimulus representations: Implications for acquired equivalence and perceptual learning. Animal Learning and Behavior 1996, 24:233-255.
7. Holland P.C. Acquisition of representation-mediated conditioned food aversions. Learning and Motivation 1981, 12:1-18.
8. James W. The principles of psychology 1890, Holt, New York.
9. Kehoe E.J. A layered network model of associative learning: Learning to learn and configuration. Psychological Review 1988, 95:411-433.
10. Lin, T. E., & Honey, R. C. (2009). Is associative memory blind? Manuscript in preparation.
11. McLaren I.P.L., Mackintosh N.J. Associative learning and elemental representation: II. Generalization and discrimination. Animal learning and behavior 2002, 30:177-200.
12. Pavlov I.P. Conditioned reflexes 1927, Oxford University Press, London.
13. Pearce J.M. Similarity and discrimination: A selective review and a connectionist model. Psychological Review 1994, 101:587-607.
14. Wagner A.R. SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behaviour. Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms 1981, 5-48. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ. N.E. Spear, R.R. Miller (Eds.).
15. Wagner A.R. Context-sensitive elemental theory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 2003, 56(B):7-29.
16. Wagner A.R., Rescorla R.A. Inhibition in Pavlovian conditioning: Application of a theory. Inhibition and learning 1972, 301-336. Academic Press, London. R.A. Boakes, M.S. Halliday (Eds.).
17. Ward-Robinson J., Honey R. A novel contextual dimension for use with an operant chamber: From simple to hierarchical forms of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 2000, 26:358-363.