Estimates of bark beetle infestation expansion factors with adaptive cluster sampling

International Journal of Pest Management

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 11-21

  Coggins, Sam B ^a   Coops, Nicholas C ^a   Wulder, Michael A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b PACIFIC FORESTRY CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Adaptive cluster sampling; Bark beetles; Digital aerial imagery; Forest inventory; High spatial resolution; Object based classification; Satellite

Indexed keywords

AIRBORNE SENSING; BEETLE; ESTIMATION METHOD; FOREST INVENTORY; IMAGE CLASSIFICATION; INTEGRATED PEST MANAGEMENT; PARASITE INFESTATION; PEST DAMAGE; SAMPLING BIAS; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; VARIANCE ANALYSIS;

NORTH AMERICA;

COLEOPTERA; HEXAPODA; PINUS MUGO; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 78049503081     PISSN: 09670874     EISSN: 13665863     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09670874.2010.505667     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Acharaya B, Bhattarai G, de Gier A, Stein A. 2000. Systematic adaptive cluster sampling for the assessment of rare tree species in Nepal. Forest Ecol Manag. 137(1-3):65-73.
2. British Columbia Ministry of Forests and Range [Internet]. 2002. What is the theoretical Maximum Green:Red? [cited 2009 Sep 14]. Available from http://www.for.gov.bc.ca/ hfp/health/fhdata/maxbeetles.htm.
3. Bunting P, Lucas R. 2006. The delineation of tree crowns in Australian mixed species forests using hyperspectral Compact Airborne Spectrographic Imager (CASI) data. Remote Sens Environ. 101(2):230-248.
4. Carroll AL, Shore TL, Safranyik L. 2006. Direct control: theory and practice. In: Safranyik L, Wilson WR, editors. The mountain pine beetle: a synthesis of biology, management, and impacts on lodgepole pine. Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, BC, Canada. p. 304.
5. Ciesla WM. 2000. Remote sensing in forest health protection. USDA Forest Service, Fort Collins, CO., FHTET; Report No. 00-03. p. 266.
6. Coggins SB, Coops NC, Wulder MA. 2008a. Initialisation of an insect infestation spread model using tree structure and spatial characteristics derived from high spatial resolution digital aerial imagery. Can J Remote Sens. 34(6):485-502.
7. Coggins SB, Coops NC, Wulder MA. 2010. Improvement of low level bark beetle damage estimates with adaptive cluster sampling. Silva Fenn. 44(2):289-301.
8. Coggins SB, Coops NC, Wulder MA, White JC. 2008b. Linking survey detection accuracy with ability to mitigate populations of mountain pine beetle. For Chron. 84(6):900-909.
9. Connors ME, Schwager SJ. 2002. The use of adaptive cluster sampling for hydroacoustic surveys. ICES J Mar Sci. 59(6):1314-1325.
10. Coops NC, Johnson M, Wulder MA, White JC. 2006. Assessment of QuickBird high spatial resolution imagery to detect red attack damage due to mountain pine beetle infestation. Remote Sens Environ. 103(1):67-80.
11. Franklin SE, Wulder MA, Skakun RS, Carroll AL. 2003. Mountain pine beetle red-attack forest damage classification using stratified Landsat TM data in British Columbia, Canada. Photogramm Eng Remote Sens. 69(3):283-288.
12. Gougeon FA, Leckie DG. 2002. Individual tree crown image analysis - a step towards precision forestry. First International Precision Forestry Symposium; 2001 June 17-20; Seattle, Washington. p. 11.
13. Hicke JA, Logan J. 2009. Mapping whitebark pine mortality caused by a mountain pine beetle outbreak with high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Int J Remote Sens. 30(17):4427-4441.
14. Horvitz DG, Thompson DJ. 1952. A generalization of sampling without replacement from a finite universe. J Am Stat Assoc. 47(3):663-685.
15. Moir WH. 1965. The lodgepole pine zone in Colorado. Am Midl Nat. 81(1):87-98.
16. Montreal Process Working Group [Internet]. 2001. The Montreal Process; [cited 2010 June 11]. Available from http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/mpci/.
17. Pouliot DA, King DJ, Bell FW, Pitt DG. 2002. Automated tree crown detection and delineation in high-resolution digital camera imagery of coniferous forest regeneration. Remote Sens Environ. 82(2-3):322-334.
18. Raffa KF, Aukema BH, Bentz BJ, Carroll AL, Hicke JA, Turner MG, Romme WH. 2008. Cross-scale drivers of natural disturbances prone to anthropogenic amplification: the dynamics of bark beetle eruptions. BioScience. 58(6):501-517.
19. Safranyik L. 1971. Some characteristics of the spatial arrangement of attacks by the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae (Coleoptera: Scolytidae), on lodgepole pine. Can Entomol. 103:1607-1623.
20. Safranyik L, Carroll AL. 2004. The bionomics of the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine forests: establishing a context. In: Shore TL, Brooks JE, Stone JE, editors. Mountain pine beetle symposium: challenges and solutions; 2003 Oct 30-31; Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. p. 223-232. Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, British Columbia, Information Report BC-X-399. p. 298.
21. Shore TL, Safranyik L. 1992. Susceptibility and risk-rating systems for the mountain pine beetle in lodgepole pine stands. Pacific Forestry Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific and Yukon Region. Information Report BC-X-336. p. 12.
22. Shore TL, Safranyik L, Lemieux JP. 2000. Susceptibility of lodgepole pine stands to the mountain pine beetle: testing of a rating system. Can J Forest Res. 30(1):40-44.
23. Skakun RS, Wulder MA, Franklin SE. 2003. Sensitivity of the Thematic Mapper Enhanced Wetness Difference Index (EWDI) to detect mountain pine beetle red-attack damage. Remote Sens Environ. 86(4):433-443.
24. Smith DR, Conroy MJ, Brakhage DH. 1995. Efficiency of adaptive cluster sampling for estimating density of wintering waterfowl. Biometrics. 51(2):777-788.
25. Smith DR, Villella RF, Lemarie DP. 2003. Application of adaptive cluster sampling to low-density populations of freshwater mussels. Environ Ecol Stat. 10(1):7-15.
26. Talvitie M, Leino O, Holopainen M. 2006. Inventory of sparse forest populations using adaptive cluster sampling. Silva Fenn. 40(1):101-108.
27. Thompson SK. 1990. Adaptive cluster sampling. J Am Stat Assoc. 85(412):1050-1059.
28. Thompson SK. 1991. Adaptive cluster sampling: designs with primary and secondary units. Biometrics. 47(3):1103-1115.
29. White JC, Wulder MA, Brooks D, Reich R, Wheate RD. 2005. Detection of red attack stage mountain pine beetle infestation with high spatial resolution satellite imagery. Remote Sens Environ. 96(3-4):340-351.
30. Wilson WR. 2004. An overview of the mountain pine beetle initiative. In: Shore TL, Brooks JE, Stone JE, editors. Proceedings on the mountain pine beetle symposium: challenges and solutions; 2003 Oct 30-31; Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Forest Service, Pacific Forestry Centre, Victoria, British Columbia, Information Report BC-X-399. p. 298.
31. Wulder MA, Ortlepp SM, White JC, Coops NC, Coggins SB. 2009b. Monitoring the impacts of mountain pine beetle mitigation. Forest Ecol Manag. 258(7):1181-1187.
32. Wulder MA, White JC, Carroll AL, Coops NC. 2009a. Challenges for the operational detection of mountain pine beetle green attack with remote sensing. For Chron. 85(1):32-38.