The use of adaptive cluster sampling for hydroacoustic surveys

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 59, Issue 6, 2002, Pages 1314-1325

  Conners, M Elizabeth ^a,b   Schwager, Steven J ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^b ALASKA FISHERIES SCIENCE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive cluster sampling; Patchy distributions; Spatial sampling; Stock assessment; Survey design

Indexed keywords

FISHERY SURVEY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SAMPLING; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

OSMERUS MORDAX;

EID: 0036893289     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1006/jmsc.2002.1306     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Appenzeller, A. R., and Leggett, W. C. 1996. Do diel changes in patchiness exhibited by schooling fishes influence the precision of estimates of fish abundance obtained from hydroacoustic trawl surveys? Archiv fur Hydrobiologie, 135(3): 377-391.
2. Barange, M., and Hampton, I. 1997. Spatial structure of co-occurring anchovy and sardine populations for acoustic data: Implications for survey design. Fisheries Oceanography, 6(2): 94-108.
3. Bellhouse, D. R. 1977. Some optimal designs for sampling in two dimensions. Biometrics, 64(3): 605-611.
4. Brandt, S. B., Mason, D. M., Patrick, E. V., Argyl, R. L., Wells, L., Unger, P. A., and Stewart, D. J. 1991. Acoustic measures of the abundance and size of pelagic planktivores in Lake Michigan. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48: 894-908.
5. Brown, J. A., and Manly, B. J. F. 1998. Restricted adaptive cluster sampling. Environmental and Ecological Statistics, 5(1): 49-63.
6. Christman, M. C. 1997. Efficiency of some sampling designs for spatially clustered populations. Environmetrics, 8(2): 145-166.
7. Conners, M. E. 1999. Use of Adaptive Cluster Sampling for Fisheries Hydroacoustics. M.S. Thesis, Cornell University.
8. Cochran, W. G. 1977. Sampling Techniques. John Wiley and Sons, NY.
9. Einhouse, D., and Tyson, J., et al. 1997. Report of the Lake Erie Forage Task Group, Lake Erie Committee, Great Lakes Fishery Commission, March 1997. 24pp.
10. Foote, K. G., and Stefansson, G. 1993. Definition of the problem of estimating fish abundance over an area from acoustic line-transect measurements of density. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 50: 369-381.
11. Francis, R. I. C. C. 1984. An adaptive strategy for stratified random trawl surveys. New Zeland Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 18: 59-71.
12. Gavaris, S., and Smith, S. J. 1987. Effect of allocation and stratification strategies on precision of survey abundance estimates for Atlantic Cod Gadus-morhua on the eastern Scotian shelf, Canada. Journal of Northwest Atlantic Fishery Science, 7(2): 137-144.
13. Gilbert, R. O. 1987. Statistical Methods for Environmental Pollution Monitoring. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, Inc., NY.
14. Guillard, J., and Gerdeaux, D., et al. 1992. The use of geostatistics to analyze data from an echo-integration survey of fish stock in Lake Sainte-Croix. Fisheries Research, 13(4): 395-406.
15. Gunderson, D. R. 1995. Surveys of Fisheries Resources. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
16. Hampton, I. 1996. Acoustic and egg-population estimates of South African anchovy biomass over a decade: Comparisons, accuracy, and utility. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(2): 493-500.
17. Hedayat, A. S., and Sinha, B. K. 1991. Design and Inference in Finite Population Sampling. John Wiley and Sons, NY.
18. ICES 1993. Report of the workshop on the applicability of spatial statistical techniques to acoustic survey data. ICES Cooperative Research Report 195.
19. Jolly, G. M., and Hampton, I. 1990. A stratified random transect design for acoustic surveys of fish stocks. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 47(7): 1282-1291.
20. Jurvelius, J., and Auvinen, H. 1989. Fish echo-sounding in a large lake a systematic and unsystematic sampling of pelagic fish stock. Aqua Fenn, 19(2): 123-128.
21. Murray, A. W. A. 1996. Comparison of geostatistical and random sample survey analyses of Antarctic krill acoustic data. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53: 415-421.
22. Patil, G. P., and Rao, C. R. (eds) 1994. Environmental Statistics. Elsevier Science Publishers, North-Holland, NY.
23. Pelletier, D., and Parma, A. M. 1994. Spatial distribution of Pacific halibut (Hippoglossus stenolepis): An application of geostatistics to longline survey data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 51(7): 1506-1518.
24. Petitgas, P. 1993a. Geostatistics for fish stock assessments a review and an acoustic application. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 3: 285-298.
25. Petitgas, P. 1993b. Use of a disjunctive kriging to model areas of high pelagic fish density in acoustic fisheries surveys. Aquatic Living Resources, 6(3): 201-209.
26. Pontius, J. A. 1997. Strip adaptive cluster sampling: Probability proportional to size selection of primary units. Biometrics, 53(3): 1092-1096.
27. Ripley, B. D. 1981. Spatial Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, NY.
28. Roesch, F. A. Jr 1993. Adaptive cluster sampling for forest inventories. Forest Science, 39; 655-669.
29. Salehi, M., and Seber, G. A. F. 1997a. Two-stage adaptive cluster sampling. Biometrics, 53(3): 959-970.
30. Salehi, M., and Seber, G. A. F. 1997b. Adaptive cluster sampling with networks selected without replacement. Biometrika, 84(1).
31. Seber, G. A. F., and Thompson, S. K. 1994. Environmental adaptive sampling. In Handbook of Statistics 12, pp. 201-220. Ed. by G. P. Patil, and C. R. Rao. Elsevier Science Publishers, North Holland, NY.
32. Simmonds, E. J., and Fryer, R. J. 1996. Which are better, random or systematic acoustic surveys? A simulation using North Sea herring as an example. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(1): 39-50.
33. Smith, D. R., and Conroy, M. J., et al. 1995. Efficiency of adaptive cluster sampling for estimating density of wintering waterfowl. Biometrics, 51(2): 777-788.
34. Stefansson, G. 1996. Analysis of groundfish survey abundance data: Combining the GLM and delta approaches. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(3).
35. Stolyarenko, D. A. 1992. Two-dimensional spline approximation on local integral. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 14: 509-514.
36. Sullivan, P. J. 1991. Stock abundance estimation using depth-dependent trends and spatially correlated variation. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 48(9): 1691-1703.
37. Swartzman, G. H. 1992. Spatial-analysis of Bering Sea ground-fish survey data using generalized additive models. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 49(7).
38. Thompson, S. K. 1990. Adaptive cluster sampling. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 85(412): 1050-1059.
39. Thompson, S. K. 1991a. Stratified adaptive cluster sampling. Biometrika, 78(2): 389-398.
40. Thompson, S. K. 1991b. Adaptive cluster sampling: Designs with primary and secondary units. Biometrics, 47: 1103-1115.
41. Thompson, S. K. 1992. Sampling. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
42. Thompson, S. K. 1996. Adaptive cluster sampling based on order statistics. Environmetrics, 7(2).
43. Thompson, S. K., and Seber, G. A. F. 1996. Adaptive Sampling. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
44. Williamson, N. J. 1982. Cluster sampling estimation of the variance of abundance estimates derived from quantitative echo sounder surveys. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 39: 229-231.
45. Williamson, N. J., and Traynor, J. J. 1996. Application of a one-dimensional geostatistical procedure to fisheries acoustic surveys of Alaskan pollock. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 53(2): 423-428.