Error measures for noise-free surrogate approximations

46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages

  Goel, Tushar ^a   Haftka, Raphael T ^b   Shyy, Wei ^c  

^a LIVERMORE SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Ensemble strategy; Error measures; Prediction variance; Press; Surrogate models

Indexed keywords

INTERPOLATION; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MEAN SQUARE ERROR; POLYNOMIALS; PRESSES (MACHINE TOOLS); STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

CROSS VALIDATION ERRORS; DISTRIBUTION-FREE; ENSEMBLE STRATEGIES; ERROR MEASURES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATE; PREDICTION VARIANCE; ROOT MEAN SQUARE ERRORS; SURROGATE MODEL;

ERRORS;

EID: 78049488409     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.2514/6.2008-901     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Queipo NV, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Goel T, Vaidyanathan R, Tucker PK (2005), Surrogate-based analysis and optimization, Progress in Aerospace Sciences, 41: 1-28.
2. Jones DR, Schonlau M, Welch WJ (1998), Efficient global optimization of expensive black-box functions, Journal of Global Optimization, 13 (4): 455-492.
3. Kleijnen JPC, van Beers WCM (2004), Application-driven sequential designs for simulation experiments: Kriging metamodeling, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55 (9): 876-883.
4. Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Queipo NV (2007), Ensemble of surrogates, Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization Journal, 196 (4-6): 879-893.
5. Meckesheimer M, Barton RR, Simpson TW, Booker A (2002), Computationally inexpensive meta-model assessment strategies, AIAA Journal, 40(10): 2053-2060.
6. Ueberhuber CW (1997), Numerical computation 2: Methods, software and analysis, Springer-Verlag: Berlin, p.71.
7. Myers RH, Montgomery DC (1995), Response surface methodology-process and product optimization using designed experiments, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: New York.
8. Khuri AI, Cornell JA (1996), Response surfaces: Designs and analysis, Marcel Dekker, Inc.: New York.
9. Matheron G (1963), Principles of geostatistics, Economic Geology, 58: 1246-1266.
10. Martin JD, Simpson TW (2005), Use of kriging models to approximate deterministic computer models, AIAA Journal, 43 (4): 853-863.
11. Lophaven SN, Nielsen HB, Sondergaard J, DACE: A MATLAB kriging toolbox, version 2.0, Information and Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, 2002.
12. Den Hertog D, Kleijnen JPC, Siem AYD (2006), The correct kriging variance estimated by bootstrapping. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57 (4): 400-409.
13. Mitchell TJ, Morris MD (1992), Bayesian design and analysis of computer experiments: Two examples, Statistica Sinica, 2 (2): 359-379.
14. Currin C, Mitchell TJ, Morris MD, Ylvisaker D (1998), A bayesian approach to the design and analysis of computer experiments, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge TN, Technical Report ORNL-6498.
15. Martin JD (2005), A methodology for evaluating system-level uncertainty in the conceptual design of complex multidisciplinary systems, PhD Thesis, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park PA.
16. th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, Honolulu HI, 23 Apr - 26 Apr, AIAA-2007-1928.
17. Goel T (2007), Multiple surrogates and error modeling in optimization of liquid rocket propulsion components, PhD Thesis, Dept. of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, The University of Florida, Gainesville FL.
18. Dixon LCW, Szegö GP (1978), Towards global optimization 2, North-Holland, Amsterdam.
19. nd AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Seattle WA, 2001, AIAA-2001-1522.
20. McKay M, Conover W, Beckman R (1979), A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code, Technometrics, 21: 239-245.
21. Goel T, Haftka RT, Shyy W, Watson LT (2007), Pitfalls of using a single criterion for selecting experimental designs, accepted for publication in International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering.
22. MATLAB®, The Language of Technical Computing, Version 6.5 Release 13. © 1984-2002, The MathWorks Inc.