An Integrated Quality Assurance Approach for Use Case Based Requirements

Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), Proceedings - Series of the Gesellschaft fur Informatik (GI)

Volumn P-45, Issue , 2004, Pages 59-74

  Denger, Christian ^a   Paech, Barbara ^b  

^a FRAUNHOFER IESE   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEFECTS; INTEGRATED CONTROL; LIFE CYCLE;

CASE BASED; COMBINES USE; HIGH QUALITY; INTEGRATED APPROACH; INTEGRATED QUALITY; MODEL DRIVEN DEVELOPMENT APPROACHES; PROJECT SUCCESS; RATIONAL UNIFIED PROCESS; SOFTWARE LIFE CYCLES; SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS;

QUALITY ASSURANCE;

EID: 78049484805     PISSN: 16175468     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Amour, F.; Miller, G.; Advanced UC Modelling; Addison Wesley, 2001
2. Anda, B.; Sjøberg, D. I. K.; Towards an inspection technique for UC models; In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE), pages 127 - 134, Italy, 2002
3. Boehm, B.; Basili V. R.; Software Defect Reduction Top 10 List; IEEE Computer, Vol. 34, No. 1, January 2001
4. Booch, G.; Rumbaugh, J.; Jacobson, I.; The Unified Modelling Language User Guide; Addison-Wesley, 1999
5. Basili, V.R.; Green, S.; Laitenberger, O.; Lanubile, F.; Shull, F.; Sorumgard, S.; Zelkowitz M.; The Empirical Investigation of Perspective-based Reading; Empirical Software Engineering 1, pages 133-164, 1996
6. Bunse, C.; Laitenberger, O.; Improving Component Quality Through the Systematic Combination of Construction and Analysis; In: Proceedings of Software Quality Week Europe, Belgium, 2002
7. Boehm B. W.; Software Engineering Economics; Advances in Computer Science and Technology; Prentice Hall, 1981
8. Bittner, K.; Spence, I.; UC Modeling; Addison Wesley, 2003
9. Constantine, L.; Lockwood,L.: Software for Use, Addison Wesley, 1999
10. Cockburn, A.; Writing Effective UCs; Addison Wesley, 2001
11. Davis, F. D.; Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of Information technology; MIS Quarterly, pages 319-340, 1989
12. Denger, C; Ciolkowski M; Lanubile, F: Does Active Guidance Improve Software Inspections? A Preliminary Empirical Study; Accepted for publication in the proceedings of the IASTED conference 2004, Innsbruck, Austria
13. th International Conference "Software & Systems Engineering and their Applications" Paris - December 2, 3 & 4, 2003
14. Denger, C.; Paech, B.; Benz, S.; Guidelines - Creating UCs for Embedded Systems; IESE Report No. 078.03/E, 2003
15. Firesmith, G.; UCs: the Pros and Cons; http://www.ksc.com/article7.html
16. Harel, D.; Modeling Reactive Systems with Statecharts; McGraw-Hill; 1998
17. IEEE Recommended Practice for Software Requirements Specification, Standard 830-1998, 1998
18. Kruchten P.; The Rational Unified Process, An Introduction; Addison Wesley; 1999
19. Laitenberger, O.; Cost-effective Detection of Software Defects through Perspective-based Inspections; PhD Thesis in Experimental Software Engineering; Fraunhofer IRB Verlag, 2000
20. Lilly, S.; UC Pitfalls: Top 10 Problems from Real Projects Using UCs; Proceedings Technology of object-oriented languages and systems (TOOLS), pages 174-183, 1999
21. th Conference of the Unified Modelling Language (UML 2002); Germany 2002
22. Rolland, C.; Achour, C. B.; Guiding the Construction of Textual UC Specifications, Data & Knowledge Engineering Journal, Vol 25, N°1-2, pages 125-160, North Holland, Elsevier Science Publishers, March 1998
23. J. Ryser, M. Glinz: A Practical Approach to Validating and Testing Software Systems Using Scenarios, Proceedings Quality Week Europe, 1999
24. http://www.ilogix.com/products/rhapsody/index.cfm