Towards an inspection technique for use case models

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 27, Issue , 2002, Pages 127-134

  Anda, Bente ^a   Sjøberg, Dag I K ^a  

^a SIMULA RESEARCH LABORATORY   (Norway)

Author keywords

inspections; use cases

Indexed keywords

EFFICIENT METHOD; FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENT; INSPECTION TECHNIQUE; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS; SOFTWARE INSPECTION; SOFTWARE PRODUCTS; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS; USE CASE MODEL;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; DEFECTS; KNOWLEDGE ENGINEERING; SOFTWARE DESIGN;

INSPECTION;

EID: 77953767461     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/568760.568785     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Anda, B., Dreiem, H., Sjøberg, D.I.K., and Jørgensen, M. Estimating Software Development Effort Based on Use Cases - Experiences from Industry. UML'2001, Toronto, Canada, October 1-5, 2001, LNCS 2185 Springer-Verlag, pp. 487-502.
2. Anda, B., Sjøberg, D.I.K. and Jørgensen, M. Quality and Understandability in Use Case Models. ECOOP'2001, June 18-22, 2001, LNCS 2072 Springer-Verlag, pp. 402-428.
3. Armour, F. and Miller, G. Advanced Use Case Modelling. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
4. Cheng, B. and Jeffery, R. Comparing Inspection Strategies for Software Requirement Specifications. Proceedings Australian Software Engineering Conference. IEEE Comput. Soc, Los Alamitos, CA, USA, 1996.
5. Cockburn, A. Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
6. El Emam, K. and Laitenberger, O. Evaluating Capture-Recapture Models with Two Inspectors. IEEE Trans. on Softw. Eng., Vol. 27(9), pp. 851-864, September 2001.
7. Fagan, M.E. Design and Code Inspections to Reduce Errors in Program Development. IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 15(3), pp. 182-211, 1976.
8. Gilb, T. and Graham, D. Software Inspection. Addison-Wesley, 1993.
9. Hurlbut, R.R. A Survey of Approaches for Describing and Formalizing Use Cases. Technical Report: XPT-TR-97-03, Expertech, Ltd., 1997.
10. Kulak, D. and Guiney, E. Use Cases: Requirements in Context. Addison-Wesley, 2000.
11. Laitenberger, O., Atkinson, C., Schlich, M. and El Emam, K. An experimental comparison of reading techniques for defect detection in UML design documents. Journal of Systems and Software, Vol. 53(2), pp. 183-204, August 2000.
12. Lanubile.F. and Visaggio, G. Assessing defect detection methods for software requirements inspections through external replication, ISERN-96-01, January 1996.
13. Miller, J., Wood, M., Roper, M. and Brooks, A. Further Experiences with Scenarios and Checklists. Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 3(1), pp. 37-64, January 1998.
14. Porter, A.A., Votta, L.G. and Basili, V.R. Comparing Detection Methods for Software Requirements Inspections: a Replicated Experiment. IEEE Trans. on Softw. Eng., Vol. 21(6), pp. 563-575, June 1995.
15. Sandahl, K, Blomkvist, O., Karlsson, J., Krysander, C., Lindvall, M. and Ohlsson, N. An Extended Replication of an Experiment for Assessing Methods for Software Requirements Inspections, Empirical Software Engineering, Vol. 3(4), pp. 327-354, December 1998.
16. Schneider, G. and Winters, J. Applying Use Cases - A Practical Guide. Addison-Wesley, 1998.
17. Shull, F., Rus, I. and Basili, V. How Perspective-Based Reading Can Improve Requirements Inspections. IEEE Computer, Vol. 33(7), pp. 73-79, July 2000.
18. Shull, F., Travassos, G.H., Carver, J. and Basili, V.R. Evolving a Set of Techniques for OO Inspections. CS-TR-4070 and UMIACS-TR-, October 1999.
19. th Ed. Addison-Wesley, 1996.
20. Thelin, T., Runeson, P. And Wohlin, C. An Experimental Comparison of Usage-Based and Checklist-Based Reading. WISE 2001.
21. Yourdon, E. Structured Walkthroughs. Prentice-Hall, 1989.
22. www.mcbreen.ab.ca/papers/QAUseCases.html