Developmental constraints on the evolution of wing-body allometry in Manduca sexta

Evolution and Development

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 592-600

  Tobler, Alexandra ^a   Nijhout, H Frederik ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALLOMETRY; BIOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; BODY SIZE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; LARVA; MOTH; SELECTION; SIZE; WING MORPHOLOGY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; EVOLUTION; FORELIMB; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; LARVA; LEPIDOPTERA;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; BODY SIZE; LARVA; MANDUCA; WING;

MANDUCA SEXTA;

EID: 78049477174     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: 1525142X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2010.00444.x     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Atkinson, D., Morley, S. A., and Hughes, R. N. 2006. From cells to colonies: at what levels of body organization does the 'temperature-size rule' apply? Evol. Dev. 8: 202-214.
2. Bell, R., and Joachim, F. 1976. Techniques for rearing laboratory colonies of tobacco hornworms and pink bollworms. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 69: 365-373.
3. Britton, J. S., and Edgar, B. A. 1998. Environmental control of the cell cycle in Drosophila: nutrition activates mitotic and endoreplicative cells by distinct mechanisms. Development 125: 2149-2158.
4. Chai, P., and Srygley, R. B. 1990. Predation and the flight, morphology, and temperature of neotropical rain-forest butterflies. Am. Nat. 135: 748-765.
5. D'Amico, L., Davidowitz, G., and Nijhout, H. 2001. The developmental and physiological basis of body size evolution in an insect. Proc. R. Soc. Lond., Ser. B: Biol. Sci. 268: 1589-1593.
6. Davidowitz, G., D'Amico, L. J., and Nijhout, H. F. 2003. Critical weight in the development of insect body size. Evol. Dev. 5: 188-197.
7. Davidowitz, G., Roff, D. A., and Nijhout, H. F. 2005. A physiological perspective on the response of body size and development time to simultaneous directional selection. Integr. Comp. Biol. 45: 525-531.
8. Dudley, R. 2000. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution. Princeton University Press, New Jersey.
9. Emlen, D. J., and Nijhout, H. F. 2000. The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 5: 661-708.
10. Frankino, W. A., Zwaan, B. J., Stern, D. L., and Brakefield, P. M. 2005. Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307: 718-720.
11. Frankino, W. A., Zwaan, B. J., Stern, D. L., and Brakefield, P. M. 2007. Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly. Evolution 61: 2958-2970.
12. Gayon, J. 2000. History of the concept of allometry. Am. Zool. 40: 748-758.
13. Gould, S. 1971. Geometric similarity in allometric growth: a contribution to the problem of scaling in the evolution of size. Am. Nat. 105: 113.
14. Huxley, J., and Teissier, G. 1936. Terminology of relative growth rates. Nature 137: 780-781.
15. Huxley, J. S. 1924. Constant differential growth-ratios and their significance. Nature 114: 895-896.
16. Huxley, J. S. 1932. Problems of Relative Growth. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
17. Jolicoeur, P. 1989. A simplified model for bivariate complex allometry. J. Theor. Biol 140: 41-49.
18. Kingsolver, J. 1999. Experimental analyses of wing size, flight and survival in the Western white butterfly. Evolution 53: 1479-1490.
19. LaBarbera, M. 1989. Analyzing body size as a factor in ecology and evolution. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20: 97-117.
20. Marden, J. H., and Chai, P. 1991. Aerial predation and butterfly design: how palatability, mimicry, and the need for evasive flight constrain mass allocation. Am Nat. 138: 15-36.
21. Maynard Smith, J., et al. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 60: 265-287.
22. McArdle, B. 1988. The structural relationship: regression in biology. Can. J. Zool. 66: 2329-2339.
23. Nijhout, H. 2003. The control of body size in insects. Dev. Biol. 261: 1-9.
24. Nijhout, H., Davidowitz, G., and Roff, D. 2006. A quantitative analysis of the mechanism that controls body size in Manduca sexta. J. Biol. 5: 16.
25. Nijhout, H., and Williams, C. 1974. Control of moulting and metamorphosis in the tobacco hornworm, Manduca sexta (L.): cessation of juvenile hormone secretion as a trigger for pupation. J. Exp. Biol. 61: 493-501.
26. Nijhout, H. F., and Emlen, D. J. 1998. Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. PNAS 95: 3685-3689.
27. Nijhout, H. F., Roff, D. A., and Davidowitz, G. 2010. Conflicting processes in the evolution of body size and development time. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 365: 567-575.
28. Nijhout, H. F., Smith, W. A., Schachar, I., Subramanian, S., Tobler, A., and Grunert, L. W. 2007. The control of growth and differentiation of the wing imaginal disks of Manduca sexta. Dev. Biol. 302: 569-576.
29. Nijhout, H. F., and Wheeler, D. E. 1996. Growth models of complex allometries in holometabolous insects. Am. Nat. 148: 40-56.
30. Raff, R. 1996. The Shape of Life. Genes, Development, and the Evolution of Animal Form. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
31. Riddiford, L. M., and Truman, J. W. 1993. Hormone receptors and the regulation of insect metamorphosis. Am. Zool. 33: 340-347.
32. Robertson, F. W. 1963. The ecological genetics of growth in Drosophila 6. The genetic correlation between the duration of the larval period and body size in relation to larval diet. Genet. Res. 4: 74-92.
33. Shingleton, A. W., Das, J., Vinicius, L., and Stern, D. L. 2005. The temporal requirements for insulin signaling during development in Drosophila. PLoS Biol 3: e289.
34. Shingleton, A. W., Frankino, W. A., Flatt, T., Nijhout, H. F., and Emlen, D. J. 2007. Size and shape: the developmental regulation of static allometry in insects. Bioessays 29: 536-548.
35. Shingleton, A. W., Mirth, C. K., and Bates, P. W. 2008. Developmental model of static allometry in holometabolous insects. Proc. R. Soc.: Biol. Sci. Ser. B 275: 1875-1885.
36. Srygley, R. B., and Dudley, R. 1993. Correlations of the position of center of body mass with butterfly escape tactics. J. Exp. Biol. 174: 155-166.
37. Stern, D. L., and Emlen, D. J. 1999. The developmental basis for allometry in insects. Development 126: 1091-1101.
38. Stevens, C. 2009. Darwin and Huxley revisited: the origin of allometry. J. Biol. 8: 11.
39. Strauss, E. 1990. Patterns of quantitative variation in Lepidopteran wing morphology: the convergent groups Heliconiinae and Ithomiinae (Papilionoidea: Nymphalidae). Evolution 44: 86-103.
40. Strauss, R. (1992). Lepidopteran wing morphology: the multivariate analysis of size, shape, and allometric scaling. In R. Footit and J. A. F. Sorenson (eds.). Ordinations in the Study of Morphology, Evolution and Systematics of Insects: Applications and Quantitative Genetic Rationales. Elsevier, New York, pp. 157-178.
41. Thomas, R. H. 1993. Ecology of body size in Drosophila buzzatii: untangling the effects of temperature and nutrition. Ecol. Entomol. 18: 84-90.
42. Thornhill, R., and Alcock, J. 1983. The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
43. Tobler, A., and Nijhout, H. F. 2010. A switch in the control of growth of the wing imaginal disks of Manduca sexta. PLoS ONE 5: e10723.
44. Warton, D., and Weber, N. 2002. Common slope tests for bivariate errors-in-variables models. Biometric. J. 44: 161-174.
45. Warton, D., Wright, I., Falster, D., and Westoby, M. 2006. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biol. Rev. Camb. Philos. Soc. 81: 259-291.
46. White, J. F., and Gould, S. J. 1965. Interpretation of the coefficient in the allometric equation. Am. Nat. 99: 5-18.
47. Wickman, P.-O. 1992. Sexual selection and butterfly design-a comparative study. Evolution 46: 1525-1536.