Method variance from the perspectives of reviewers: Poorly understood problem or overemphasized complaint?

Organizational Research Methods

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 421-434

  Pace, Victoria L ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

method variance quantitative research; research design; survey research quantitative research

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049471690     PISSN: 10944281     EISSN: 15527425     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1094428109351751     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Bagozzi, R.P., & Yi, Y. (1990). Assessing method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices: The case of self-reported affect and perceptions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 547-560.
2. Becker, T.E., & Cote, J.A. (1994). Additive and multiplicative method effects in applied psychological research: An empirical assessment of three models. Journal of Management, 20, 625-641.
3. Burke, M.J., Brief, A.P., & George, J.M. (1993). The role of negative affectivity in understanding relations between self-reports of stressors and strains: A comment on the applied psychology literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 402-412.
4. Campbell, D.T., & Fiske, D.W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
5. Conway, J.M. (1998). Understanding method variance in multitrait-multirater performance appraisal matrices: Examples using general impressions and interpersonal affect as measured method factors. Human Performance, 11, 29-55.
6. Doty, D.H., & Glick, W.H. (1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1, 374-406.
7. Fiske, D.W., & Pearson, P.H. (1970). Theory and techniques of personality measurement. In P. H. Mussen & M. R. Rosenzweig (Eds.), Annual review of psychology (Vol. XXI, pp. 49-86). Palo Alto: Annual Reviews, Inc.
8. Golding, S.L. (1977). Method variance, inadequate constructs, or things that go bump in the night? The Journal of Multivariate Behavioral Research, 12, 89-98.
9. Judge, T.A., & Cable, D.M. (2004). The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 428-441.
10. Moorman, R.H., & Podsakoff, P.M. (1992). A meta-analytic review and empirical test of the potential confounding effects of social desirability response sets in organizational behaviour research. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 65, 131-149.
11. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879-903.
12. Scullen, S.E. (1999). Using confirmatory factor analysis of correlated uniquenesses to estimate method variance in multitrait-multimethod matrices. Organizational Research Methods, 2, 275-292.
13. Shavelson, R.J., Webb, N.M., & Rowley, G.L. (1989). Generalizability theory. American Psychologist, 44, 922-932.
14. Spector, P.E. (1987). Method variance as an artifact in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Myth or significant problem? Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 438-443.
15. Spector, P.E. (2006). Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 221-232.
16. Spector, P.E., Chen, P.Y., & O'Connell, B.J. (2000). A longitudinal study of relations between job stressors and job strains while controlling for prior negative affectivity and strains. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 211-218.
17. Vandenberg, R.J. (2006). Statistical and methodological myths and urban legends: Where, pray tell, did they get this idea? Organizational Research Methods, 9, 194-201.
18. Williams, L.J., & Anderson, S.E. (1994). An alternative approach to method effects by using latent-variable models: Applications in organizational behavior research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 323-331.
19. Williams, L.J., & Brown, B.K. (1994). Method variance in organizational behavior and human resources research: Effects on correlations, path coefficients, and hypothesis testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 57, 185-209.
20. Williams, L.J., Cote, J.A., & Buckley, M.R. (1989). Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact? Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 462-468.
21. Williams, L.J., Gavin, M.B., & Williams, M.L. (1996). Measurement and nonmeasurement processes with negative affectivity and employee attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 88-101.
22. Zapf, D., Dormann, C., & Frese, M. (1996). Longitudinal studies in organizational stress research: A review of the literature with reference to methodological issues. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 1, 145-169.