Trust in medical decision-making concerning older people: The views of key professionals in the dutch health care practice

Health

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 564-584

  Ubachs Moust, Josy ^a   Houtepen, Rob ^a   van der Weijden, Trudy ^a   Meulen, Ruud ^b   Vos, Rein ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

decision making; discretionary power; older people; professional freedom; public trust

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; GERIATRIC NURSING; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; NETHERLANDS; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; TRUST;

AGED; GERIATRIC NURSING; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NETHERLANDS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; TRUST;

EID: 78049457243     PISSN: 13634593     EISSN: 14617196     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1363459309360787     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. ABIM Foundation ACP-ASIM Foundation European Federation of Internal Medicine (2002) Charter on Medical Professionalism. Annals of Internal Medicine 136(3): 243-246.
2. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF (2001) Principles of Biomedical Ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Centre for Ethics and Health (2004) Ethics and Health Monitoring Report. Zoetermeer: RVZ.
4. Charles C., Gafni A., and Whelan T. (1997) Shared Decision-Making in the Medical Encounter: What Does It Mean? (Or It Takes at Least Two to Tango). Social Science and Medicine 44(5): 681-692.
5. Coulehan J. (2005) Today's Professionalism: Engaging the Mind but Not the Heart. Academic Medicine 80(10): 892-898.
6. Evans JG (1997) The Rationing Debate: Rationing Health Care by Age: The Case Against. British Medical Journal 314(7083): 822-825.
7. Frank JR (ed.) (2005) The CanMEDS 2005 Physician Competency Framework. Better Standards. Better Physicians. Better Care. Ottowa: The Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada.
8. Freidson E. (2001) Professionalism: The Third Logic. Cambridge: Polity Press.
9. Gwyn R., Elwyn G. (1999) When Is a Shared Decision Not (Quite) a Shared Decision? Negotiating Preferences in a General Practice Encounter. Social Science and Medicine 49(4): 437-447.
10. Hall MA (2006) Researching Medical Trust in the United States. Journal of Health Organization and Management 20(5): 456-467.
11. Harris J. (1987) QUALYfying the value of life. Journal of Medical Ethics 13(3): 117-123.
12. Health Council of the Netherlands (1998) President: What about Age? Rijswijk: Health Council of the Netherlands.
13. Health Council of the Netherlands (2006) Performance Indicators and Public Reporting in Health Care: A Review of the Scientific Literature and an Ethical Analysis. The Hague: Health Council of the Netherlands.
14. Help the Aged (2009) Half of Doctors Say NHS Is Ageist, 27 January. Available at: http://www.helptheaged.org.uk/en-gb/Campaigns/News/Archive/news_NHS+is+ageist_270109.htm.
15. Jones K. (1996) Trust as an Affective Attitude. Ethics 107(1): 4-25.
16. Kao AC, Green DC, Zaslavsky AM, Koplan JP, and Cleary PD (1998) The Relationship between Method of Physician Payment and Patient Trust. Journal of the American Medical Association 280(19): 1708-1714.
17. Khodyakov D. (2007) Trust as a Process: A Three-Dimensional Approach. Sociology 41(1): 115-132.
18. Le Grand J. (2003) Motivation, Agency, and Public Policy: Of Knights and Knaves, Pawns and Queens. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Mechanic D. (1998) The Functions and Limitations of Trust in the Provision of Medical Care. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law 23(4): 661-686.
20. Mechanic D., Schlesinger M. (1996) The Impact of Managed Care on Patients' Trust in Medical Care and Their Physicians. Journal of the American Medical Association 275(21): 1693-1697.
21. Pearson SD, Raeke LH (2000) Patients' Trust in Physicians: Many Theories, Few Measures, and Little Data. Journal of General Internal Medicine 15(7): 509-513.
22. Pfadenhauer M. (2006) Crisis or Decline? Problems of Legitimation and Loss of Trust in Modern Professionalism. Current Sociology 54(4): 565-578.
23. Polit DF, Beck CT (2004) Nursing Research: Principles and Methods. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincot Williams & Wilkins.
24. Richmond JB, Eisenberg L. (2000) Medical Professionalism in Society. New England Journal of Medicine 342(17): 1288.
25. Royal College of Physicians (RCP) (2005) Doctors in Society: Medical Professionalism in a Changing World. Report of a Working Party of the Royal College of Physicians of London. London: RCP.
26. Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG) (2007) KNMG Manifesto on Medical Professionalism. Utrecht: The Royal Dutch Medical Association (KNMG).
27. Sox HC (2002) Medical Professionalism in the New Millenium: A Physician Charter. Annals of Internal Medicine 136(3): 243-246.
28. Swick HM (2000) Toward a Normative Definition of Medical Professionalism. Academic Medicine 75(6): 612-616.
29. Tsuchiya A. (2000) Qualy's and Ageism: Philosophical Theories and Age Weighting. Health Economics 9(1): 57-68.
30. Van der Schee E., Groenewegen PP, and Friele RD (2006) Public Trust in Health Care: A Performance Indicator? Journal of Health Organization and Management 20(5): 468-476.
31. Van der Weyden MB (2002) Medical Professionalism in the New Millenium: A Physician's Charter. Medical Journal of Australia 177(5): 263-265.
32. Victor C. (2005) The Epidemiology of Ageing. In: Johnson ML (ed.) The Cambridge Handbook of Age and Ageing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 95-105.
33. Walker M. (2009) Groningen Naturalism in Bioethics. In: Lindemann H, Verkerk M, and Walker M (eds) Naturalized Bioethics: Toward Responsible Knowing and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1-20.