The End of Science…and Where Other Disciplines Begin: Exploring the Nature of Science

Beyond the Boundaries: A Transdisciplinary Approach to Learning and Teaching

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 47-67

  Moss, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049436872     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R., & Lederman, N.G. (1997). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Chicago, IL.
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Project 2061: Science for all Americans. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University Press.
4. Brewer, C. A., & Beiswenger, J. M. (1993). Carbon dioxide and the greenhouse effect: A problem evaluation activity. American Biology Teacher, 55(4), pp. 238-240.
5. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M.G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
6. Brusic, S. A. (1992). Achieving STS goals through experiential learning. Theory Into Practice, 31(1), pp. 44-51.
7. Chapman, S., McPhee, P., & Proudman, B. (1992). What is experiential education? The Journal of Experiential Education, 15(2), pp. 16-23.
8. Clough, M.P., & Clark, R. (1994). Cookbooks and constructivism: A better approach to laboratory activities. The Science Teacher, 61(2), pp. 34-37.
9. Conry, R.F., & Jeroski, S. F. (1982). An evaluation of Project Learning Tree in British Columbia. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
10. Cothram, JỀ, & Smith, E. (1981). Development and validation of the conceptions of scientific theories test. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 18(5), pp. 387-396.
11. DeBoer, G.E. (1991). A history of ideas in science education. New York: Teachers Co!֊ lege Press.
12. DeBoer, G.E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), pp. 582-601.
13. Dewey, J. (1962). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books. (Original work published 1938)
14. Duschl, R.A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Eisenhart, M., Finkel, E., & Marion, S. F. (1996). Creating conditions for scientific literacy: A re-examination. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), pp. 261-295.
16. Fullan, M.G., & Miles, M. (1992). Getting reform right: What works and what doesn't. Phi Delta Kappan, 73(10), pp. 744-52.
17. Garrison, J. W., & Bentley, M. L. (1990). Teaching scientific method: The logic of confirmation and falsification. School Science and Mathematics, 90(3), pp. 188-197.
18. Giordan, A. (1991). The importance of modeling in the teaching and popularization of science. Impact of Science on Society, 41(4), pp. 321-338.
19. Glasgow, N. A. (1996). Doing science: Innovative curriculum for the life sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
20. Good, R. (1996). Trying to teach consensus on the nature of science: Words get in the way. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, St. Louis, MO.
21. Iozzi, L., & Halsey, B. (1993). Environmental education activity guide: PreK-8. Washington, DC: American Forest Foundation.
22. Katz, L. G. (1994). The project approach. ERIC Digest. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. EDO-PS-94֊6)
23. Katz, L.G., & Chard, S.C. (1989). Engaging children's minds: The project approach. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
24. Kimball, M. (1968). Understanding the nature of science: A comparison of scientists and science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 5, pp. 110-120.
25. Krajcik, J.S., Blumenfeld, P.C., Marx, R.W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle grade science teachers learn project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), pp. 483-497.
26. Kunz, D.E. (1990, March). The effects of a Project Learning Tree workshop on preservice teachers' attitudes toward teaching and environmental education. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.
27. Ladewski, BG., Krajcik, J. S., & Harvey, C.L. (1994). A middle grade science teacher's emerging understanding of project-based instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 94(5), pp. 499-515.
28. Lederman, N.G. (1986). Students' and teachers' understanding of the nature of science: A reassessment. School Science and Mathematics, 86(2), pp. 91-99.
29. Lederman, N.G. (1992). Students' and teachers' conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), pp. 331-359.
30. Lederman, N.G., Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Schwartz, R. S. (2002). Views of Nature of Science Questionnaire: Toward valid and meaningful assessment of learners' conceptions of nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(6), pp. 497-521.
31. Loving, C.C. (1995). Comment on "Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education." Science Education, 79(3), pp. 341-348.
32. Loving, C.C. (1997). From the summit of truth to its slippery slopes: Science education's journey through positivist-postmodern territory. American Educational Research Journal, 34(3), pp. 421-452.
33. Martin, B., & Brouwer, W. (1993). Exploring personal science. Science Education, 77(4), pp. 441-459.
34. Matthews, M. R. (1998). In defense of modest goals when teaching about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(2), pp. 161-174.
35. Meichtry, Y.J. (1993). The impact of science curricula on student views about the nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30(5), pp. 429-443.
36. Moore, J. A. (1985). Science as a way of knowing—Human ecology. American Zoology, 25, pp. 483-637.
37. Morgan, A. (1983). Theoretical aspects of project-based learning in higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 1(14), pp. 66-78.
38. Moss, D. M. (2003). A window on science: Exploring the JASON Project and student conceptions of science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 22(1), 21-30.
39. Moss, D. M., Abrams, E. D., & Robb, J. (2001). Describing student conceptions of the nature of science over an entire school year. International Journal of Science Education, 23(8), pp. 771-790.
40. Moss, D.M., Abrams, E.D., & Robb-Kull, J. (1998). Can we be scientists too? Secondary students' perceptions of scientific research from a project-based classroom. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 7(2), pp. 149-161.
41. Murfin, B. (1994). African science, African and African-American scientists and the school science curriculum. School Science and Mathematics, 94(2), 96-103.
42. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. (1994). Our mission to planet Earth: A guide to teaching Earth system science. Washington, DC: Author.
43. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (1994). What teachers should know and be able to do. Washington, DC: Author.
44. National Center for Educational Statistics. (1995). Mini-digest of education statistics 1995. Washington, DC: National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES 95-214).
45. National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards. Washington, DC: Academy Press.
46. National Science Teachers Association. (1982). Science-technology-society: Science education for the 1980s. Washington, DC: Author.
47. Ogborn, J., & Mellar, H. (1994). Models: Their makers, uses, and problems. In H. Mellar, J. Bliss, R. Boohan, J. Ogborn, & C. Tompsett (Eds.), Learning with artificial worlds: Computer-based modeling in the curriculum (pp. 16-26). London: Falmer Press.
48. Parker, J. C., & Rubin, L. J. (1966). Curriculum design and the application of knowledge. Chicago: Rand McNally.
49. Prawat, R. S. (1992). Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), pp. 354-395.
50. Riechard, D. E. (1994). National science education standards: Around the reform bush… again? The Clearing House, 67(3), pp. 135-136.
51. Rubba, P., & Anderson, H. (1978). The development of an instrument to assess secondary students' understanding of the nature of scientific knowledge. Science Education, 62(4), pp. 449-458.
52. Schwab, J. (1969). The practical: The language for curriculum. School Review, 78(1), pp. 1-23.
53. Schwartz, D.G. (1987). Environmental education and its effects on students' attitudes toward the curriculum. Unpublished master's thesis, Idaho State University, Pocatello, ID
54. Scott, C. A. (1994). Project-based science: Reflections of a middle school teacher. The Elementary School Journal, 95(1), pp. 75-94.
55. Showalter, V. (1974). What is unified science education? Program objectives and scientific literacy (Part 5). Prisim II, 2(3 & 4).
56. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N. W. (1994). Multiculturalism, universalism, and science education. Science Education, 78(4), pp. 387-398.
57. Stanley, W. B., & Brickhouse, N.W. (1995). Science education without foundations: A response to Loving. Science Education, 79(3), pp. 349-354.
58. Tinker, R. F. (1997). Student-scientist partnerships: Shrewd maneuvers. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 6(2), pp. 111-117.
59. Whitehead, A.N. (1929). The aims of education and other essays. New York: Macmillan.
60. Wolk, S. (1994). Project-based learning: Pursuits with a purpose. Educational Leadership, 52(3), pp. 42-45.