Patient satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life outcomes of implant overdentures and fixed complete dentures

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 25, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 791-800

  Brennan, Maire ^a   Houston, Frank ^a   O’Sullivan, Michael ^a   O’Connell, Brian ^a  

^a TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Dental implants; Patient satisfaction; Quality of life; Treatment outcomes

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTURE; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ECONOMICS; EDENTULOUSNESS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MALE; MASTICATION; MENTAL STRESS; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH HYGIENE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; DENTIST-PATIENT RELATIONS; DENTURE, COMPLETE; DENTURE, COMPLETE, UPPER; DENTURE, OVERLAY; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; JAW, EDENTULOUS; MALE; MASTICATION; MIDDLE AGED; ORAL HEALTH; ORAL HYGIENE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STRESS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78049434511     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization, 2001.
2. Guckes AD, Scurria MS, Shugars DA. A conceptual framework for understanding outcomes of oral implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1996; 75: 633-639.
3. Lewis DW. Optimized therapy for the edentulous predicament: Cost-effectiveness considerations. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 93-99.
4. Albrektsson T, Isidor F. Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang NP, Karring T (eds). Proceedings of the First European Workshop on Periodontology. Berlin: Quintessence, 1994: 365-369.
5. Lang NP, Karring T, Meredith N. Group E summary. Fourth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol 2002; 29(suppl 3): 232-233.
6. Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: Towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 641.
7. Strassburger C, Heydecke G, Kerschbaum T. Influence of prosthetic and implant therapy on satisfaction and quality of life: A systematic literature revie. Part 1-Characteristics of the studies. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 83-93.
8. Awad MA, Feine JS. Measuring patient satisfaction with mandibular prostheses. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998; 26: 400-405.
9. Smedley TC, Friedrichsen SW, Cho MH. A comparison of selfassessed satisfaction among wearers of dentures, hearing aids, and eyeglasses. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 62: 654-661.
10. Strassburger C, Kerschbaum T, Heydecke G. Influence of implant and conventional prostheses on satisfaction and quality of life: A literature revie. Part 2: Qualitative analysis and evaluation of the studies. Int J Prosthodont 2006; 19: 339-348.
11. Awad MA, Locker D, Korner-Bitensky N, Feine JS. Measuring the effect of intra-oral implant rehabilitation on health-related quality of life in a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Dent Res 2000; 79: 1659-1663.
12. Heydecke G. Implantologie: Wohlbefinden für senioren. Zahnarztl Mitt 2000; 90: 52-57.
13. Locker D. Measuring oral health: A conceptual framework. Community Dent Health 1988; 5: 3-18.
14. Slade GD. Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997; 25: 284-290.
15. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Walshaw D, Locker D. A comparison of the validity of generic- and disease-specific measures in the assessment of oral health-related quality of life. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999; 27: 344-352.
16. Awad MA, Lund JP, Dufresne E, Feine JS. Comparing the efficacy of mandibular implant-retained overdentures and conventional dentures among middle-aged edentulous patients: Satisfaction and functional assessment. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 117-122.
17. Awad MA, Lund JP, Shapiro SH, et al. Oral health status and treatment satisfaction with mandibular implant overdentures and conventional dentures: A randomized clinical trial in a senior population. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 390-396.
18. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Walshaw D. A patient-based assessment of implant-stabilized and conventional complete dentures. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 141-147.
19. Allen PF, McMillan AS, Locker D. An assessment of sensitivity to change of the Oral Health Impact Profile in a clinical trial. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001; 29: 175-182.
20. Chan MF, Johnston C, Howell RA, Cawood JI. Prosthetic management of the atrophic mandible using endosseous implants and overdentures: A six year review. Br Dent J 1995; 179: 329-337.
21. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, Van Steenberghe D. A 5-year prospective randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining a mandibular overdenture: Prosthetic aspects and patient satisfaction. J Oral Rehabil 1999; 26: 195-202.
22. Walton JN, MacEntee MI, Glick N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2002; 17: 391-398.
23. Albrektsson T, Blomberg S, Brånemark A, Carlsson GE. Edentulousness-An oral handicap. Patient reactions to treatment with jawbone-anchored prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 1987; 14: 503-511.
24. Moberg LE, Kondell PA, Sagulin GB, Bolin A, Heimdahl A, Gynther GW. Brånemark system and ITI dental implant system for treatment of mandibular edentulis. A comparative randomized study: 3-year follow-up. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001; 12: 450-461.
25. Sandberg G, Stenberg T, Wikblad K. Ten years of patients’ experiences with fixed implant-supported prostheses. J Dent Hyg 2000; 74: 210-218.
26. Feine JS, de Grandmont P, Boudrias P, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: Choice of prosthesis. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1105-1111.
27. Heydecke G, Boudrias P, Awad MA, De Albuquerque RF, Lund JP, Feine JS. Within-subject comparisons of maxillary fixed and removable implant prostheses: Patient satisfaction and choice of prosthesis. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 125-130.
28. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part I: Patients’ assessments. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 424-433.
29. Vermylen K, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL, De Bruyn H. Patient satisfaction and quality of single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res 2003; 14: 119-124.
30. de Bruyn H, Collaert B, Linden U, Bjorn AL. Patient’s opinion and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Brånemark implant. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental practices. Clin Oral Implants Res 1997; 8: 265-271.
31. Thomason JM, Heydecke G, Feine JS, Ellis JS. How do patients perceive the benefit of reconstructive dentistry with regard to oral health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res 2007; 18(suppl 3): 168-188.
32. Allen F, McMillan A. Food selection and perceptions of chewing ability following provision of implant and conventional prostheses in complete denture wearers. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 320-326.
33. de Grandmont P, Feine JS, Tache R, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant-supported mandibular prostheses: Psychometric evaluation. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1096-1104.
34. Heydecke G, Klemetti E, Awad MA, Lund JP, Feine JS. Relationship between prosthodontic evaluation and patient ratings of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 307-312.
35. Tang L, Lund JP, Tache R, Clokie CM, Feine JS. A within-subject comparison of mandibular long-bar and hybrid implant-supported prostheses: Psychometric evaluation and patient preference. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1675-1683.
36. Feine JS, Dufresne E, Boudrias P, Lund J. Outcome assessment of implant-supported prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 575-579.
37. Kent G. Effects of osseointegrated implants on psychological and social well-being: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 515-518.
38. Slade GD, Spencer AJ. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994; 11: 3-11.
39. Stewart AL, Hays RD, Ware JE Jr. The MOS short-form general health survey. Reliability and validity in a patient population. Med Care 1988; 26: 724-735.
40. Allen F, Locker D. A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 2002; 15: 446-450.
41. Mische C. Dental Implant Prosthetics. St Louis: Mosby, 2005.
42. Zitzmann NU, Marinello CP. Treatment outcomes of fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. Part II: Clinical findings. J Prosthet Dent 2000; 83: 434-442.
43. Locker D. Patient-based assessments of the out-comes of implant therapy: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthdont 1998; 11: 453-461.
44. Sonoyama W, Kuboki T, Okamoto S, et al. Quality of life assessment in patients with implant-supported and resin-bonded fixed prosthesis for bounded edentulous spaces. Clin Oral Implants Res 2002; 13: 359-364.
45. Feine JS, Awad MA, Lund JP. The impact of patient preference on the design and interpretation of clinical trials. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1998; 26: 70-74.