Patient-Based Assessment of the Outcomes of Implant Therapy: A Review of the Literature

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 11, Issue 5, 1998, Pages 453-461

  Locker, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

DENTAL IMPLANTATION, ENDOSSEOUS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT SATISFACTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 0032153475     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Guckes A, Scurria M, Shugars D. A conceptual framework for understanding outcomes of oral implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1996;75:633-639.
2. Kiyak A, Beach B, Worthington P, Taylor T, Bolender C, Evans J. The psychological impact of osseointegrated dental implants, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5:61-69.
3. Chan M, Nahri T, de Baat C, Kalk W. Treatment of the atrophic: edentulous maxilla with implant supported overdentures: A review of the literature. Int J Prosthdont 1998;11:7-15.
4. Anderson J. The need for criteria on reporting treatment outcomes, J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:49-55.
5. Kent G. Effects of osseointegrated implants on psychological and social well-being: A literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:515-518.
6. Albrektsson T, Blomberg S, Brånemark A, Carlsson GE. Edentulousness - an oral handicap. Patient reactions to treatment with jawbone-anchored prostheses. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:503-511.
7. Slade G (ed). Measuring Oral Health and the Quality of Life. Chapel Hill: Dental Ecology, Univ of North Carolina, 1997.
8. Locker D. The burden of oral disorders in a population of older adults. Comm Dent Health 1992;9:109-124.
9. Shortell S, Richardson W. Health Program Evaluation. St Louis: CV Mosby, 1978.
10. Bowling A. Research Methods in Health. Buckingham: Open Univ Press, 1997.
11. Goldberg D, Williams P. A User's Guide to the General Health Questionnaire. Windsor: NFER-Nelson, 1988.
12. Locker D. Measuring oral health: A conceptual framework. Comm Dent Health 1998;5:5-13.
13. Slade G, Spencer A. Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Comm Dent Health 1994;11:3-11.
14. Harle T, Anderson J. Patient satisfaction with implant supported prostheses. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:153-162.
15. Humphris G, Healey T, Howell R, Cawood J. The psychological impact of implant retained mandibular prostheses: A cross-sectional study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1995; 10:437-444.
16. Hoogstraten J, Lamers L. Patient satisfaction after insertion of an osseointegrated implant bridge. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:481-487.
17. Grogono A, Lancaster D, Finger I. Dental implants: A survey of patients' attitudes. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:573-576.
18. Tavares M, Branch L, Shulman L. Dental implant patients and their satisfaction with treatment. J Dent Educ 1990;54:670-679.
19. Clancy J, Buchs A, Ardjmand H. A retrospective analysis of one implant system in an oral surgery practice. Phase 1: Patient satisfaction. J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:265-271.
20. Wismeijer D, Vermeeren J, van Waas M. Patient satisfaction with overdentures supported by one stage TPS implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:51-55.
21. Grogono A, Gardiner D, Finger I. Functional and psychological factors influencing patient attitudes towards implant prostheses. Oral Health 1997;Nov:15-20.
22. Gregory M, Murphy W, Watson C, Reeve P. A clinical study of the Brånemark dental implant system. Brit Dent J 1990;168:18-23.
23. Cibirka R, Razzoog M, Lang B. Critical evaluation of patient responses to dental implant therapy. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:574-581.
24. Blomberg S, Lindquist L. Psychological reactions to edentulousness and treatment with jaw-bone anchored bridges. Acta Psychiat Scand 1983;68:251-262.
25. Kent G, Johns R. A controlled longitudinal study on the psychological effects of osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1991;6:470-474.
26. Kent G, Johns R. Effects of osseointegrated implants on psychological and social well-being: A comparison with replacement removable prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:103-106.
27. De Grandmont P, Feine J, Tache R, Boudrias P, Donohue W, Tanguay K, et al. Within-subject comparisons of implant supported prostheses: Psychometric evaluation. J Dent Res 1994; 73:1096-1104.
28. Boerrigter E, Geertman M, Van Oort R, Bouma J, Raghoebar G, Van Waas M, et al. Patient satisfaction with implant retained mandibular overdentures. A comparison with new complete dentures not retained by implants - A multicentre randomized clinical trial, Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995; 33:282-288.
29. Geertman M, Boerrigter E, Van Oort J, Van Waas M, van't Hof M, Boering G, et al. Two-center clinical trial of implant retained mandibular overdentures versus complete dentures - chewing ability. Comm Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996; 24:79-84.
30. Geertman M, van Waas M, van't Hof M, Kalk W. Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant retained mandibular overdentures: A randomized clinical trial. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:194-200.
31. Boerrigter E, Stegenga B, Raghoebar G, Boering G. Patient satisfaction and chewing ability with implant retained mandibular overdentures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:1167-1173.
32. Bouma J, Boerrigter L, Van Oort R, van Sonderen V, Boering G. Psychosocial effects of implant retained overdentures. J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1997;12:515-522.
33. Kapur K and Participants of CSP No. 86. Veterans Administration Cooperative Dental Implant Study. Comparisons between fixed partial dentures supported by blade-vent implants and removable partial dentures. Part IV: Comparisons of patient satisfaction between two treatment modalities. J Prosthet Dent 1991;66:15-530.