Sensory profiles and preference analysis in ornamental horticulture: The case of the rosebush

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 21, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 987-997

  Boumaza, Rachid ^a,b   Huché Thélier, Lydie ^a   Demotes Mainard, Sabine ^a   Coz, Eric Le ^a   Leduc, Nathalie ^a   Pelleschi Travier, Sandrine ^a   Qannari, El Mostafa ^c   Sakr, Soulaiman ^a,b   Santagostini, Pierre ^b   Symoneaux, Ronan ^d   Guérin, Vincent ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ D'ANGERS   (France)

^b AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

^c LUNAM UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^d ESA   (France)

Author keywords

Cluster analysis; Panel performance; Preference; Rosa hybrida L.; Rose; Visual quality

Indexed keywords

ROSA HYBRID CULTIVAR;

EID: 78049422147     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2010.05.003     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Produits de pépinières. Rosiers. Spécifications particulières. Association française de normalisation. Norme NF.V12-053 1990, AFNOR, AFNOR Group, La Plaine Saint-Denis, France.
2. Boumaza R., Demotes-Mainard S., Huché-Thélier L., Guérin V. Visual characterization of the esthetic quality of the rosebush. Journal of Sensory Studies 2009, 24:774-796.
3. Dijkshoorn-Dekker, M. W. C. (2002). Crop quality control system: A tool to control the visual quality of pot plants. Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
4. Dijksterhuis G. Assessing panel consonance. Food Quality and Preference 1995, 6:7-14.
5. Greenhoof K., MacFie H.J.H. Preference mapping in practice. Measurement of food preferences 1994, Glasgow, Chapman & Hall. H.J.H. MacFie, D.M.H. Thomson (Eds.).
6. Habib, R., Triboï, E., Génard, M., & Le Bail, M. (1997). La nutrition azotée des cultures et la qualité des produits. In Maîtrise de l'azote dans les agro-systèmes. Paris: INRA (Les colloques, no. 83). Reims (France), 19-20 novembre 1996.
7. Heuvelink E., Tijskens P., Kang M.Z. Modelling product quality in horticulture: An overview. Proceedings of the international workshop on models for plant growth and control of product quality in horticultural production. Acta Horticulturae 2004, 654:19-30.
8. Lawless H.T., Heymann H. Sensory evaluation of food 1999, Springer, New York.
9. Measurement of food preferences 1994, Chapman & Hall, Glasgow. H.J.H. MacFie, D.M.H. Thomson (Eds.).
10. Mandel J. The validation of measurement through interlaboratory studies. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1991, 11:109-119.
11. Meilgaard M.C., Civille G.V., Carr B.T. Sensory evaluation techniques 2007, CRC Press, London.
12. Meullenet J.F., Xiong R., Findlay C.J. Multivariate and probabilistic analyses of sensory science problems 2007, Blackwell Publishing, Ames.
13. R Development Core Team (2009). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL http://www.R-project.org.
14. Roberts, A.V., Debener, T., & Gudin, S. (2003). Encyclopedia of rose science (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: Elsevier Academic Press.
15. Rossi F. Assessing sensory panelist performance using repeatability and reproducibility measures. Food quality and preference 2001, 12:467-479.
16. Statistical Graphics Corporation. Statgraphics for Windows, 1993-1997 1997, Statgraphics.
17. Stone H., Sidel J.L. Sensory evaluation practices 2004, Elsevier Academic Press, San Diego.
18. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, homogeneity and stability. Rose (Rosa L.). UPOV/TG/11/7 1990, UPOV, International Union for the Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva.