Subcutaneous connective tissue reaction to methacrylate resin-based and zinc oxide and eugenol sealers

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 36, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 1574-1579

  Zmener, Osvaldo ^a   Pameijer, Cornelis H ^b   Kokubu, Gabriel A ^a   Grana, Daniel R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DEL SALVADOR   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT   (United States)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Endodontics; Methacrylate based sealers; Tissue response

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049413346     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2010.06.019     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Nguyen TN. Obturation of the root canal system. In: Cohen S, Burns RC. Pathways of the Pulp. 4th ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1987: 183-94.
2. Taintor JF, Ross PN. Opinions and practices of American Endodontic Diplomates. Dent J 1978; 44: 321-5.
3. ADA Council of Scientific affairs. Statement on posterior resin-based composites. ADA Council on Dental Benefit Programs. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129: 1627-8.
4. Louw NP, Pameijer CH, Norval G. Histopathological evaluation of a root canal sealer in subhuman primates. J Dent Res 2001; 80: 654.
5. Zmener O. Tissue response to a new methacrylate-based root canal sealer: preliminary observations in the subcutaneous connective tissue of rats. J Endod 2004; 30: 348-51.
6. Zmener O, Banegas G, Pameijer CH. Bone tissue response to a methacrylate-based endodontic sealer: a histological and histometric study. J Endod 2005; 31: 457-9.
7. Sousa CJA, Montes CRM, Pascon EA, et al. Comparison of the intraosseous biocompatibility of AH Plus, EndoREZ and Epiphany root canal sealers. J Endod 2006; 32: 656-42.
8. Zmener O, Pameijer CH. Clinical and radiographic evaluation, of a resin-based root canal sealer. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 19-22.
9. Zmener O, Pameijer CH. Clinical and radiographical evaluation of a resin-based root canal sealer: a 5-year follow-up. J Endod 2007; 33: 676-9.
10. Cotton TP, Schindler WG, Schwartz SA, et al. A retrospective study comparing clinical outcomes after obturation with Resilon/Epiphany or gutta-percha/Kerr sealer. J Endod 2008; 34: 789-97.
11. Zmener O, Pameijer CH, Alvarez Serrano S. Effect of immediate and delayed post space preparation on coronal bacterial microleakage in root canals obturated with a methacrylate-based sealer with an without accelerator. An ex vivo study. Am J Dent 2010; 23: 116-20.
12. Ferracane JL, Condon JR. Rate of elution of leachable components from composite. Dent Mat 1990; 6: 282-7.
13. Ferracane JL. Elution of leachable components from composites. J Oral Rehabil. 1994; 21: 441-52.
14. Augsburger RA, Peters DD. Radiographic evaluation of extruded obturation materials. J Endod 1990; 16: 492-7.
15. ISO 10993-1:1992, Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 1: Guidance on Selection of Tests. Geneva: ISO; 1992.
16. ISO 10993-2:1992, Biological. Evaluation of Medical Devices-Part 2: Animal Welfare Requirements. Geneva: ISO; 1992.
17. Bayne K. Developing guidelines of the care and use of animals. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1998; 30: 105-10.
18. Olsson B, Sliwkowsky A, Langeland K. Subcutaneous implantation for the biological evaluation of endodontic materials. J Endod 1981; 7: 355-69.
19. FDI. Féderation Dentalre Internationale. Recommended standard practices for the biological evaluation of dental materials. Int Dent J 1980; 30: 174-6.
20. Zmener O, Cabrini RL. Monocyte-lymphocyte adhesion to three zinc oxide and eugenol-based endodontic cements: an in vitro assay. Acta Odontol Latinoam 1986; 3: 27-32.
21. Pinna L, Brackett MG, Lockwood PE, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity evaluation of a selfadhesive methacrylate resin-based root canal sealer. J Endod 2008; 34: 1085-8.
22. Pascon EA, Leonardo MR, Safavi K, et al. Tissue reaction to endodontic materials: methods, criteria, assessment and observations. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 72: 222-37.
23. Kolokouris I, Economides N, Beltes P, et al. In vivo comparison of the biocompatibility of two root canal sealers implanted into the subcutaneous connective tissue of rats. J Endod 1998; 24: 82-5.
24. Zmener O, Guglielmotti B, Cabrini RL. Biocompatibility of two calcium hydroxidebased endodontic sealers: a quantitative study in the subcutaneous connective tissue of the rat. J Endod 1988; 14: 229-35.
25. Zmener O, Guglielmotti B, Cabrini RL. Tissue response to an experimental calcium hydroxide-based endodontic sealer: a quantitative study in the subcutaneous connective tissue of the rat. Endod Dent Traumatol 1990; 6: 66-72.
26. Andrzejewska E, Linden LA, Rabek JF. The role of oxygen in camphorquinone-initial photopolymerization. Macromol Chem Phys 1998; 199: 441-9.
27. Versiani MA, Carvalho-Junior JR, Padilha MIAF, et al. A comparative study of physicochemical properties of AH Plus and Epiphany root canal sealants. Int Endod J 2006; 39: 464-71.
28. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990; 69: 1652-8.
29. Rathbun MA, Craig RG, Hanks CT, et al. Cytotoxicity of a BIS-GMA dental composite before and after leaching in organic solvents. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 443-57.
30. Costa CAS, Hebling J, Teixeira MF. Preliminary study of the biological compatibility of the dentine adhesives All-bond 2 and Scotchbond MP. Histological evaluation of subcutaneous implants in rats. Rev Odontol USP 1997; 11: 11-8.
31. Costa CAS, Teixeira HM, Lopes Nascimento AB, et al. Biocompatibility of two current adhesive resins. J Endod 2000; 26: 512-6.
32. Molnar EJ. Residual eugenol from zinc-oxide-eugenol compounds. J Dent Res 1967; 46: 645-9.
33. Rodrigues H, Spängberg L, Langeland K. Biologic effects of dental materials. 9. Effect of zinc oxide-eugenol cements on He La cells in vitro. Estomat Cult 1975; 9: 191-4.
34. Zmener O, Cabrini. RL. Effects of three calcium hydroxide-based materials on human blood monocytes and lymphocytes. Endod Dent Traumatol 1987; 3: 28-32.
35. Zmener O, Goldberg F, Cabrini RL. Effects of two gutta-percha formulations and one zinc oxide-eugenol and Canada balsam mixture on human blood monocytes and lymphocytes. Endod Dent Traumatol 1989; 5: 73-7.
36. Geurtsen W, Leyhausen G. Biological aspects of root canal filling materials-histocompatibility, cytotoxicity and mutagenicity. Clin Oral. Invest 1997; 1: 5-11.
37. Tagger M, Tagger E. Subcutaneous reactions to implantation of tubes with AH26 and Grosman's sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1986; 62: 434-40.
38. Yesilsoy C, Koren LZ, Morse DR, et al. A comparative tissue toxicity evaluation of established and newer root canal sealers. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1988; 65: 459-67.
39. Scarparo RK, Grecca FS, Fachin EVF. Analysis of tissue reactions to methacrylate resin-based, epoxy resin-based, and zinc oxide-eugenol endodontic sealers. J Endod 2009; 35: 229-32.