Developing guidelines on the care and use of animals

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Volumn 862, Issue , 1998, Pages 105-110

  Bayne, Kathryn ^a  

^a Assoc for Assess/A of L A C I   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCREDITATION; ANIMAL WELFARE; COMPETENCE; CONFERENCE PAPER; EXPERIMENTAL ANIMAL; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; LAW; NONHUMAN; POLICY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0032437786     PISSN: 00778923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1998.tb09122.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. 1. United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service. 1991. Federal Register 56(32) 9CFR, Part 3, February 15, 1991: 6309-6505.
2. 2. National Research Council. 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. National Academy Press. Washington, DC.
3. 3. Division of Animal Welfare, Office for Protection from Research Risks, National Institutes of Health. 1996. Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Bethesda, MD.
4. 4. Bayne, K. 1996. Revised Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals available. The Physiologist 39: 199-211.
5. 5. Martin, D.P. 1997. Interpreting the Standards: Updates from USDA, OPRR and AAALAC International. In Performance Standards and Animal Welfare: Definition, Application and Assessment. Part 1. Scientists' Center for Animal Welfare. Greenbelt, MD.
6. 6. Bayne, K.A. & D.P. Martin. 1998. Using performance standards to evaluate an animal care and use program. Lab. Animal 27: in press.
7. 7. Tannenbaum, J. 1997. Implications of applying performance standards to the animal research setting. In Performance Standards and Animal Welfare: Definition, Application and Assessment. Part 1. Scientists Center for Animal Welfare. Greenbelt, MD.
8. 8. Houston, A.I. 1997. Demand curves and welfare. Animal Behav. 53: 983-990.
9. 9. Duncan, I. 1992. Behavioral assessment of welfare. In The Well-Being of Agricultural Animals in Biomedical and Agricultural Research. J. Mench, S. Mayer & L. Krulisch, Eds.: 62-68. Scientists' Center for Animal Welfare, Greenbelt, MD.
10. 10. Moberg, G.P. 1987. Problems in defining stress and distress in animals. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 191: 1207-1211.
11. 11. Mench, J.A. 1997. Applying the process: What's the endpoint? Where do we start? In Performance Standards and Animal Welfare: Definition, Application and Assessment. Part 1. Scientists' Center for Animal Welfare. Greenbelt, MD.
12. 12. Bayne, K.A.L. 1997. Enriching the environment for other species: Applying what we learn. In Performance Standards and Animal Welfare: Definition, Application and Assessment. Part 1. Scientists' Center for Animal Welfare. Greenbelt, MD.
13. 13. Canadian Council on Animal Care. 1980-1984. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals, Vol 2. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
14. 14. European Union. 1986. Council Directive on the approximation of laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States regarding the protection of animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (Directive 86/609/EEC).
15. 15. Council of Europe. 1985. 1985 European Convention for the protection of vertebrate animals used for experimental and other scientific purposes (Convention ETS 123).
16. 16. Bayne, K. & C. McCully. 1989. The effect of cage size on the behavior of individually housed rhesus monkeys. Lab. Animal 18: 25-28.
17. 17. Crockett, C.M. et al. 1993. Urinary cortisol responses of longtailed macaques to five cage sizes, tethering, sedation, and room change. Am. J. Primatol. 30: 55-74.