A call-independent and automatic acoustic system for the individual recognition of animals: A novel model using four passerines

Pattern Recognition

Volumn 43, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3846-3852

  Cheng, Jinkui ^a,b   Sun, Yuehua ^a   Ji, Liqiang ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF ZOOLOGY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Call independent identification; Gaussian mixture models; Individual recognition; Mel frequency cepstral coefficients; Passerine

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTIC FIELDS; ANIMALS; SPEECH RECOGNITION;

ACOUSTIC FEATURES; GAUSSIAN MIXTURE MODEL; INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFICATION; INDIVIDUAL RECOGNITION; MEL FREQUENCY CEPSTRAL CO-EFFICIENT; PASSERINE; RECOGNITION SYSTEMS; SPECIES IDENTIFICATION;

BIOACOUSTICS;

EID: 78049393889     PISSN: 00313203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2010.04.026     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. J.D. Crawford, A.P. Cook, A.S. Heberlein, Bioacoustic behavior of African fishes (Mormyridae): potential cues for species and individual recognition in Pollimyrus, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (1997) 1200-1212.
2. M.A. Bee, C.E. Kozich, K.J. Blackwell, H.C. Gerhardt, Individual variation in advertisement calls of territorial male green frogs, Rana clamitans: implications for individual discrimination, Ethology 107 (2001) 65-84.
3. D. Rogers, Intraspecific Variation in the Acoustic Signals of Birds and Frogs: Implication for the Acoustic Identification of Individuals, University of Adelaide, South Australia, 2002.
4. A.M.R. Terry, T.M. Peake, P.K. McGregor, The role of vocal individuality in conservation, Frontiers in Zoology 2 (2005) 10.
5. D.T. Blumstein, O. Munos, Individual, age and sex-specific information is contained in yellow-bellied marmot alarm calls, Animal Behaviour 69 (2005) 353-361.
6. S.K. Darden, T. Dabelsteen, S.B. Pedersen, A potential tool for swift fox (Vulpes velox) conservation: individuality of long-range barking sequences, Journal of Mammalogy 84 (2003) 1417-1427.
7. K.H. Frommolt, M.E. Goltsman, D.W. MacDonald, Barking foxes, Alopex lagopus: field experiments in individual recognition in a territorial mammal, Animal Behaviour 65 (2003) 509-518.
8. E.J.S. Fox, J.D. Roberts, M. Bennamoun, Text-independent speaker identification in birds, in: Proceedings of the Interspeech 2006 and Ninth International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, vols. 1-5, 2006, pp. 2122-2125.
9. M.A. Roch, M.S. Soldevilla, J.C. Burtenshaw, E.E. Henderson, J.A. Hildebrand, Gaussian mixture model classification of odontocetes in the Southern California Bight and the Gulf of California, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 121 (2007) 1737-1748.
10. E.J.S. Fox, A new perspective on acoustic individual recognition in animals with limited call sharing or changing repertoires, Animal Behaviour 75 (2008) 1187-1194.
11. R.S. Sousa-Lima, A.P. Paglia, G.A.B. Da Fonseca, Signature information and individual recognition in the isolation calls of Amazonian manatees, Trichechus inunguis (Mammalia : Sirenia), Animal Behaviour 63 (2002) 301-310.
12. C. Molnar, F. Kaplan, P. Roy, F. Pachet, P. Pongracz, A. Doka, A. Miklosi, Classification of dog barks: a machine learning approach, Animal Cognition 11 (2008) 389-400.
13. M.A. Acevedo, C.J. Corrada-Bravo, H. Corrada-Bravo, L.J. Villanueva-Rivera, T.M. Aide, Automated classification of bird and amphibian calls using machine learning: a comparison of methods, Ecological Informatics 4 (2009) 206-214.
14. C.J. Huang, Y.J. Yang, D.X. Yang, Y.J. Chen, Frog classification using machine learning techniques, Expert Systems with Applications 36 (2009) 3737-3743.
15. D.A. Reynolds, Large population speaker identification using clean and telephone speech, IEEE Signal Processing Letters 2 (1995) 46-48.
16. D.M. Weary, K.J. Norris, J.B. Falls, Song features birds use to identify individuals, Auk 107 (1990) 623-625.
17. L. Rabiner, B.H. Juang, Fundamentals of Speech Recognition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993.
18. J.W. Picone, Signal modeling techniques in speech recognition, Proceedings of the IEEE 81 (1993) 1215-1247.
19. J.P. Campbell, Speaker recognition: a tutorial, Proceedings of the IEEE 85 (1997) 1437-1462.
20. C.H. Lee, C.H. Chou, C.C. Han, R.Z. Huang, Automatic recognition of animal vocalizations using averaged MFCC and linear discriminant analysis, Pattern Recognition Letters 27 (2006) 93-101.
21. C.F. Juang, T.M. Chen, Birdsong recognition using prediction-based recurrent neural fuzzy networks, Neurocomputing 71 (2007) 121-130.
22. V.M. Trifa, A.N.G. Kirschel, C.E. Taylor, E.E. Vallejo, Automated species recognition of antbirds in a Mexican rainforest using hidden Markov models, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (2008) 2424-2431.
23. P.J. Clemins, M.T. Johnson, K.M. Leong, A. Savage, Automatic classification and speaker identification of African elephant (Loxodonta africana) vocalizations, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 117 (2005) 956-963.
24. M.B. Trawicki, M.T. Johnson, T.S. Osiejuk, Automatic song-type classification and speaker identification of Norwegian Ortolan Bunting (Emberiza hortu-lana) vocalizations, in: Proceeding of the 2005 IEEE Workshop on Machine Learning for Signal Processing (MLSP), (2005) 277-282.
25. J.A. Kogan, D. Margoliash, Automated recognition of bird song elements from continuous recordings using dynamic time warping and hidden Markov models: a comparative study, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 103 (1998) 2185-2196.
26. A. Harma, Automatic identification of bird species based on sinusoidal modeling of syllables, in: Proceeding of the 2003 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. V, 2003, pp. 545-548.
27. P. Somervuo, Competing hidden Markov models on the Self-Organizing Map, Ijcnn 2000, in: Proceedings of the IEEE-Inns-Enns International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, vol. Iii, 2000, pp. 169-174.
28. E.E. Vallejo, M.L. Cody, C.E. Taylor, Unsupervised acoustic classification of bird species using hierarchical self-organizing maps, Progress in Artificial Life, Proceedings 4828 (2007) 212-221.
29. R.P. Ramachandran, K.R. Farrell, R. Ramachandran, R.J. Mammone, Speaker recognition-general and data fusion classifier approaches methods, Pattern Recognition 35 (2002) 2801-2821.
30. E.J.S. Fox, J.D. Roberts, M. Bennamoun, Call-independent individual identification in birds, Bioacoustics-the International Journal of Animal Sound and Its Recording 18 (2008) 51-67.
31. W.A. Searcy, Bird song: biological themes and variations-Catchpole,CK, Slater,PJB, Animal Behaviour 51 (1996) 492-493.
32. S.E. Anderson, A.S. Dave, D. Margoliash, Template-based automatic recognition of birdsong syllables from continuous recordings, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 100 (1996) 1209-1219.
33. S. Fagerlund, Bird species recognition using support vector machines, Eurasip Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (2007).
34. R. Vergin, D. OShaughnessy, V. Gupta, Compensated Mel frequency cepstrum coefficients, in: Proceedings of the 1996 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Conference Proceedings, vols. 1-6, 1996, pp. 323-326.
35. S.B. Davis, P. Mermelstein, Comparison of parametric representations for monosyllabic word recognition in continuously spoken sentences, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing 28 (1980) 357-366.
36. J.P. Openshaw, Z.P. Sun, J.S. Mason, A Comparison of composite features under degraded speech in speaker recognition, Icassp-93, in: Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vols. 1-5, 1993, pp. B371-B374.
37. J.C. Wang, J.F. Wang, Y.S. Weng, Chip design of MFCC extraction for speech recognition, Integration-the Vlsi Journal 32 (2002) 111-131.
38. S. Panchapagesan, A. Alwan, Frequency warping for VTLN and speaker adaptation by linear transformation of standard MFCC, Computer Speech and Language 23 (2009) 42-64.
39. S. Chauhan, P. Wang, C.S. Lim, V. Anantharaman, A computer-aided MFCC-based HMM system for automatic auscultation, Computers in Biology and Medicine 38 (2008) 221-233.
40. J.S.F. Elizabeth, A new perspective on acoustic individual recognition in animals with limited call sharing or changing repertoires, Animal Behaviour 75 (2008) 1187-1194.
41. R.A. Redner, H.F. Walker, Mixture densities, maximum-likelihood and the em algorithm, Siam Review 26 (1984) 195-237.
42. D.A. Reynolds, R.C. Rose, Robust text-independent speaker identification using gaussian mixture speaker models, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 3 (1995) 72-83.
43. H.W. Sorenson, D.L. Alspach, Recursive Bayesian estimation using Gaussian sums, Automatica 7 (1971) 465.
44. A.D. Subramaniam, B.D. Rao, PDF optimized parametric vector quantization of speech line spectral frequencies, IEEE Transactions on Speech and Audio Processing 11 (2003) 130-142.
45. A.P. Dempster, N.M. Laird, D.B. Rubin, Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via Em algorithm, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B-Methodological 39 (1977) 1-38.
46. K.Y. Lee, Local fuzzy PCA based GMM with dimension reduction on speaker identification, Pattern Recognition Letters 25 (2004) 1811-1817.
47. P.J. Clemins, M.T. Johnson, Generalized perceptual linear prediction features for animal vocalization analysis, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120 (2006) 527-534.
48. B.H. Juang, Speech recognition in adverse environments, Computer Speech and Language 5 (1991) 275-294.