How intragroup dynamics affect behavior in intergroup conflict: The role of group norms, prototypicality, and need to belong

Group Processes and Intergroup Relations

Volumn 13, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 779-794

  Steinel, Wolfgang ^a   van Kleef, Gerben A ^b   van Knippenberg, Daan ^c   Hogg, Michael A ^d   Homan, Astrid C ^e   Moffitt, Graham ^f,g  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^c ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d CLAREMONT GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^f UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^g UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

group norm; group processes; intergroup negotiation; need to belong; prototypicality; representative negotiation

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049381536     PISSN: 13684302     EISSN: 14617188     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1368430210375702     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Adams, J.S. (1976). The structure and dynamics of behavior in organizational boundary roles. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1175-1199). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2. Aiken, L.S., & West, S.G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Baumeister, R.F., & Leary, M.R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 497-529.
4. Benton, A.A., & Druckman, D. (1974). Constituent's bargaining orientation and intergroup negotiations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,4, 141-150.
5. De Cremer, D. (2002). Respect and cooperation in social dilemmas: The importance of feeling included. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 1335-1341.
6. De Cremer, D., & Leonardelli, G. (2003). Cooperation in social dilemmas and the need to belong: The moderating effect of group size. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice,7,168-174.
7. De Dreu, C.K.W., Beersma, B., Steinel, W., & Van Kleef, G.A. (2007). The psychology of negotiation: Principles and basic processes. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Handbook of basic principles in social psychology (2nd ed., pp. 608-629). New York: Guilford.
8. De Dreu, C.K.W., Carnevale, P.J., Emans, B.J.M., & Van De Vliert, E. (1994). Effects of gain-loss frames in negotiation: Loss aversion, mismatching, and frame adoption. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,60, 90-107.
9. De Dreu, C.K.W., & Van Lange, P.A.M. (1995). The impact of social value orientations on negotiator cognition and behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,21, 1178-1188.
10. Druckman, D. (1994). Determinants of compromising behavior in negotiation: A meta-analysis. Journal of Conflict Resolution,38, 507-556.
11. Enzle, M.E., Harvey, M.D., & Wright, E.F. (1992). Implicit role obligations versus social-responsibility in constituency representation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,62, 238-245.
12. Gelfand, M.J., & Realo, A. (1999). Individualism-collectivism and accountability in intergroup negotiations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 721-736.
13. Gruder, C.L., & Rosen, N. (1971). Effects of intergroup relations on intergroup bargaining. International Journal of Group Tensions,1, 301-317.
14. Hermann, M.G., & Kogan, N. (1968). Negotiation in leader and delegate groups. Journal of Conflict Resolution,12, 332-344.
15. Hewstone, M., Rubin, M., & Willis, H. (2002). Intergroup bias. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 575-604.
16. Hilty, J.A., & Carnevale, P.J. (1993). Black-hat white-hat strategy in bilateral negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 55, 444-469.
17. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Hogg, M.A. (2001). A social identity theory of leadership. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5, 184-200.
19. Hogg, M.A. (2003). Social identity. In M. R. Leary & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), Handbook of self and identity (pp. 462-479).New York: Guilford.
20. Hogg, M.A., & Turner, J.C. (1987). Intergroup behaviour, self-stereotyping and the salience of social categories. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 325-340.
21. Hogg, M.A., & Van Knippenberg, D. (2003). Social identity and leadership processes in groups. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 1-52.
22. Holmes, J.G., & Lamm, H. (1979). Boundary roles and the reduction of conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 304-317). Monterey, CA: Brooks/ Cole.
23. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N.R., & Spears, R. (2002). On being peripheral: Effects of identity insecurity on personal and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology,32, 105-123.
24. Jetten, J., Branscombe, N.R., Spears, R., & McKimmie, B.M. (2003). Predicting the paths of peripherals: The interaction of identification and future possibilities. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 130-140.
25. Jetten, J., Hornsey, M.J., & Adarves-Yorno, I. (2006). When group members admit to being conformist: The role of relative intragroup status in conformity self-reports. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32,162-173.
26. Jetten, J., Spears, R., & Manstead, A.S.R. (1997). Distinctiveness threat and prototypicality: combined effects on intergroup discrimination and collective self-esteem. European Journal of Social Psychology,27, 635-657.
27. Klimoski, R.J. (1972). The effect of intragroup forces on intergroup conflict resolution. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 8, 363-383.
28. Knowles, M.L., & Gardner, W.L. (2008). Benefits of membership: The activation and amplification of group identities in response to social rejection. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34, 1200-1213.
29. Leary, M.R., Kelly, K.M., Cottrell, C.A., & Schreindorfer, L.S. (2001). Individual differences in the need to belong. Unpublished manuscript, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC.
30. MacKinnon, D.P., Fairchild, A.J., & Fritz, M.S. (2007). Mediation analysis. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 593-614.
31. MacKinnon, D.P., Lockwood, C.M., Hoffman, J.M., West, S.G., & Sheets, V. (2002). A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychological Methods,7, 83-104.
32. McKersie, R.B., & Fonstad, N.O. (1997). Teaching negotiation theory and skills over the Internet. Negotiation Journal,13, 363-368.
33. Moreland, R.L. (1985). Social categorization and the assimilation of 'new' group members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1173-1190.
34. Noel, J.G., Wann, D.L., & Branscombe, N.R. (1995). Peripheral ingroup membership status and public negativity toward outgroups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,68, 127-137.
35. Pruitt, D.G., & Carnevale, P.J. (1993). Negotiation in social conflict. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
36. Schmitt, M.T., & Branscombe, N.R. (2001). The good, the bad, and the manly: Threats to one's prototypicality and evaluations of fellow in-group members. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 510-517.
37. Short, J.F., & Strodtbeck, F.L. (1974). Group process and gang delinquency. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38. Shrout, P.E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
39. Spears, R., Doosje, B., & Ellemers, N. (1997). Self-stereotyping in the face of threats to group status and distinctiveness: The role of group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 538-553.
40. Steinel, W., De Dreu, C.K.W., Ouwehand, E., & Ramirez-Marin, J.Y. (2009). When constituencies speak in multiple tongues: The relative persuasiveness of hawkish minorities in representative negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,109, 67-78.
41. Steinel, W., Van Kleef, G.A., & Harinck, F. (2008). Are you talking to me?! Separating the people from the problem when expressing emotions in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44, 362-369.
42. Tajfel, H., & Turner, J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In S. Worchel & W. Austin (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 7-24). Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
43. Triandis, H.C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality,69, 907-924.
44. Turner, J.C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes: Theory and research (Vol. 2, pp. 77-121). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
45. Turner, J.C. (1991). Social influence. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
46. Turner, J.C., Hogg, M.A., Oakes, P.J., Reicher, S.D., & Wetherell, M.S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
47. Van Kleef, G.A., Steinel, W., Van Knippenberg, D., Hogg, M.A., & Svensson, A. (2007). Group member prototypicality and intergroup negotiation: How one's standing in the group affects negotiation behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44, 362-369.
48. Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Group norms, prototypicality, and persuasion. In M. A. Hogg, & D. J. Terry (Eds.), Attitudes, behavior, and social context: The role of norms and group membership (pp. 157-170). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
49. Vidmar, N. (1971). Effects of representational roles and mediators on negotiation effectiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 17, 48-58.
50. Wall, J.A., Jr. (1975). Effects of constituents' trust and representative bargaining orientation on intergroup bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 1004-1012.
51. Walton, R.E., & McKersie, R.B. (1965). A behavioral theory of labor negotiations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
52. Williams, K.D. (2007). Ostracism. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 425-452.
53. Williams, K. D., Forgas, J. P., & von Hippel, W. (Eds.) (2005). The social outcast: Ostracism, social exclusion, rejection, and bullying. New York: Psychology Press.