Towards a systematic exploitation of web 2.0 and simulation modeling tools in public policy process

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 6229 LNCS, Issue , 2010, Pages 1-12

  Charalabidis, Yannis ^a   Gionis, George ^b   Ferro, Enrico ^c   Loukis, Euripidis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

^b NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

^c ISTITUTO SUPERIORE MARIO BOELLA   (Italy)

Author keywords

E participation; Public policy; Simulation; Social media; System dynamics; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

E-PARTICIPATION; SIMULATION; SOCIAL MEDIA; SYSTEM DYNAMICS; WEB 2.0;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; PUBLIC POLICY; SYSTEM THEORY; WORLD WIDE WEB; SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE);

SOCIAL NETWORKING (ONLINE); PUBLIC POLICY;

EID: 78049346116     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-15158-3_1     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Rittel, H. W. J., Weber, M. M.: Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4, 155-169 (1973)
2. Buckingham Shum, S.: The Roots to Computer Supported Collaborative Argument Visualization. In: Kirschner, P. A., Buckingham Shum, S., Carr, C. S. (eds.) Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, pp. 3-20. Springer, London (2003)
3. Girle, R., Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., Verheij, B.: Decision Support for Practical Reasoning: A Theoretical and Computational Perspectiv. In: Reed, C., Norman, T. J. (eds.) Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, pp. 55-83. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)
4. Karacapilidis, N., Loukis, E., Dimopoulos, S.: Computer-supported G2G collaboration for public policy and decision making. Journal of Enterprise Information Management 18(5), 602-624 (2005)
5. Nonaka, I.: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation. Organization Science 5(1), 14-37 (1994)
6. Cohendet, P., Steinmueller, W. E.: The Codification of Knowledge: a Conceptual and Empirical Exploration. Industrial and Corporate Change 9(2), 195-209 (2000)
7. Pateman, C.: Participation and Democratic Theory. University Press, Cambridge (1970)
8. Barber, B.: Strong Democracy. University of California Press, Berkeley (1984)
9. Held, D.: Models of Participation. Polity Press, Cambridge (1987)
10. Rowe, G., Frewer, L. J.: Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation. Science, Technology & Human Values 25(1), 3-29 (2000)
11. Rowe, G., Frewer, L. J.: Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda. Science, Technology, & Human Values 29(4), 512-557 (2004)
12. Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD): Engaging Citizens Online for Better Policy-making. Policy Brief, Paris (2003)
13. Organization for Economic Co-operation & Development (OECD): Promise and Problems of e-Democracy: Challenges of Online Citizen Engagement. Paris (2004)
14. Macintosh, A.: Characterizing E-Participation in Policy Making. In: Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2004)
15. Timmers, P.: Agenda for eDemocracy - an EU perspective. European Commission (2007)
16. Ferro, E., Molinari, F.: Making Sense of Gov 2.0 Strategies: No Citizens, No Party. In: Prosser, A., Parycek, P. (eds.) Proceedings of EDEM 2009(2009)
17. Osimo, D.: Web 2.0 in Government: Why and How? JRC Scientific and Technical Reports. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies (2008), http://ftp.jrc.es/EURdoc/JRC45269.pdf (retrieved)
18. Constantinides, E.: Social Media/Web 2.0 as Marketing Parameter: An Introduction. In: Proceedings of 8th International Congress Marketing Trends (2009)
19. Constantinides, E.: Connecting Small and Medium Enterprises to the New Consumer: The Web 2.0 as Marketing Tool. In: Global Perspectives on Small and Medium Enterprise. IGI Global, Hershey (2010)
20. Kirkwood, C. W.: System Dynamics Methods - A Quick Introduction. Arizona State University, http://www.public.asu.edu/~kirkwood/sysdyn/SDWork/work-f.pdf (retrieved)
21. O' Reilly, T. E.: What is web 2.0 (2005), http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/ a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what-is-web-20.html (retrieved)
22. Borshchev, A., Filippov, A.: From System Dynamics and Discrete Event to Practical Agent Based Modelling: Reasons, Techniques, Tools. In: Proceeding of 22nd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Oxford, England (2004)
23. Forrester, J.: Industrial Dynamics: A Major Breakthrough for Decision Makers. Harvard Business Review 36(4), 37-66 (1958)
24. Forrester, J.: Industrial Dynamics. MIT Press, Cambridge (1961)
25. Liu, C. Y., Wang, W. T.: System Dynamics Approach to Simulation of Tax Policy for Traditional and Internet Phone Services. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Boston (2005)
26. Homer, J. B., Hirsch, G. B.: System Dynamics Modelling for Public Health: Background and Opportunities. American Journal of Public Health 96(3), 452-458 (2006)
27. Robert, Y. C., Leslie, V. C.: Demonstrating the utility of system dynamics for public policy analysis in New Zealand: the case of excise tax policy on tobacco. System Dynamics Review 22(4), 321-348 (2006)
28. Schwaninger, M. S., Ulli-Beer, S., Kaufmann-Hayoz, R.: Policy Analysis and Design in Local Public Management - A System Dynamics Approach. In: Handbook of Transdisciplinary Research, pp. 205-221. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
29. Zamanipour, M.: A System Dynamics Model for Analyzing the Effects of Government Policies: A Case Study of Iran's Cell Phone Market. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (2009)
30. Teekasap, P.: Cluster Formation and Government Policy: System Dynamics Approach. In: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA (2009)