Computer-supported G2G collaboration for public policy and decision-making

Journal of Enterprise Information Management

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 602-624

  Karacapilidis, Nikos ^a   Loukis, Euripides ^b   Dimopoulos, Stavros ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PATRAS   (Greece)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE AEGEAN   (Greece)

Author keywords

Decision making; Government; Greece; Knowledge management

Indexed keywords

EID: 25444450286     PISSN: 17410398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/17410390510624034     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Amoako-Gyampah, K. and Salam, A.F. (2004), "An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment", Information and Management, Vol. 41, pp. 731-45.
2. Beaudouin-Lafon, M. (1999), Computer Supported Collaborative Work, Wiley, New York, NY.
3. Buckingham Shum, S. (2003), "The roots of computer supported argument visualization", in Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S. and Carr, C. (Eds), Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Springer, London, pp. 3-24.
4. Burn, J. and Robins, G. (2003), "Moving towards e-government: a case study of organisational change processes", Logistics Information Management, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 25-35.
5. Churchill, E.F., Snowdon, D.N. and Munro, A.J. (2001), Collaborative Virtual Environments - Digital Places and Spaces for Virtual Interaction, Springer, London.
6. Cohendet, P. and Steinmueller, W.E. (2000), "The codification of knowledge: a conceptual and empirical exploration", Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 9 No. 2, pp. 195-209.
7. Conklin, J. (2003), "Dialog mapping: reflections on an industrial strength case study", in Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S. and Carr, C. (Eds), Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Springer, London, pp. 117-36.
8. Conklin, J. and Begeman, M. (1989), "gIBIS: a tool for all reasons", Journal of the American Society for Information Science, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 200-13.
9. Davis, F.D. (1986), "A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results", Doctoral Dissertation, Sloan School of Management, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, MA.
10. Davis, F.D. (1989), "Perceived usefulness perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 319-40.
11. Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R.P. and Warshaw, P.R. (1989), "User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models", Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
12. Fischer, G., McCall, R. and Morch, A. (1989), "JANUS: integrating hypertext with a knowledge-based design environment", Proceedings of the Hypertext'89 Conference, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 105-17.
13. Furst, S., Blackburn, R. and Rosen, B. (1999), "Virtual team effectiveness: a proposed research agenda", Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 249-69.
14. Girle, R., Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P. and Verheij, B. (2003), "Decision support for practical reasoning: a theoretical and computational perspective", in Reed, C. and Norman, T.J. (Eds), Argumentation Machines: New Frontiers in Argument and Computation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 55-83.
15. Heeks, R. (2002), Reinventing Government in the Information Age: International Practice in IT-Enabled Public Sector Reform, 2nd ed., Routledge, New York, NY.
16. Hevner, A.R., March, S.T., Park, J. and Ram, S. (2004), "Design science in information systems research", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 28 No. 1, pp. 75-105.
17. Holmes, D. (2001), EGov: eBusiness Strategies for Government, Nicholas Brealey Publishing, London.
18. Holsapple, C.W. and Whinston, A.B. (1996), Decision Support Systems: A Knowledge-Based Approach, West Publishing Company, St Paul, MN.
19. Hurwitz, R. and Mallery, J.C. (1995), "The open meeting: a web-based system for conferencing and collaboration", Proceedings of the 4th International World Wide Web Conference, Boston, MA, available at: www.ai.mit.edu/projects/iiip/doc/open-meeting/paper.html (accessed 13 June 2004).
20. Jackson, P. (1999), "Organizational change and virtual teams", Information Systems Journal, Vol. 9, pp. 313-32.
21. Karacapilidis, N. and Papadias, D. (2001), "Computer supported argumentation and collaborative decision-making: the HERMES system", Information Systems, Vol. 26 No. 4, pp. 259-77.
22. Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S. and Carr, C. (2003), Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Springer, London.
23. Lee, J. (1990), "SIBYL: a tool for managing group decision rationale", Proceedings of the CSCW'90 Conference, ACM Press, New York, NY, pp. 79-92.
24. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P. (2003), "Why do people use information technology: a critical review of the technology acceptance model", Information and Management, Vol. 40, pp. 191-204.
25. Leitner, C. (2003), "E-government in Europe: the state of affairs", Proceedings of the e-Government 2003 Conference, Como, 7-8 July.
26. Lenk, K. (1998), "Reform opportunities missed: will the innovative potential of information systems in public administration remain dormant forever?", Information, Communication and Society, Vol. 1, pp. 163-81.
27. Lenk, K. and Traunmüller, R. (2001), "Broadening the concept of electronic government", in Prins, J.E.J. (Ed.), Designing e-Government, Kluwer, Amsterdam, pp. 63-74.
28. Lenk, K. and Traunmüller, R. (2002), "Electronic government: where are we heading?", in Traunmüller, R. and Lenk, K. (Eds), Electronic Government - Proceedings of the 1st International Conference (EGOV-2002), Aix-en-Provence, 2-6 September, pp. 1-9.
29. Lim, J. (2003), "A conceptual framework on the adoption of negotiation support systems", Information and Software Technology, Vol. 45, pp. 469-77.
30. Lococo, A. and Yen, D. (1998), "Groupware: computer supported collaboration", Telematics and Informatics, Vol. 15, pp. 85-101.
31. Loukis, E. and Kokolakis, S. (2003), "Computer supported collaboration in the public sector: the ICTE-PAN project", Proceedings of the eGov-2003 International Conference: From E-Government to E-Governance, 2739, Prague, 1-5 September.
32. Loukis, E. and Kokolakis, S. (2004), "An architecture for a flexible public sector collaborative environment based on business process modelling", Electronic Journal of e-Commerce Tools and Applications, Vol. 1 No. 3.
33. Lurey, J. and Raisinghani, M. (2001), "An empirical study of best practices in virtual teams", Information and Management, Vol. 38, pp. 523-44.
34. McDonough, E.F., Kahn, K. and Barczak, G. (2001), "An investigation of the use of global, virtual and collocated new product development teams", Journal of Product Innovation Management, Vol. 18, pp. 110-20.
35. Markus, M.L., Majchrzak, A. and Gasser, L. (2002), "A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes", MIS Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 179-212.
36. May, A. and Carter, C. (2001), "A case study of virtual team working in the European automotive industry", International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, Vol. 27, pp. 171-86.
37. Munkvold, B. (2003a), "Collaboration technology: overview and current trends", in Munkvold, B. (Ed.), Implementing Collaboration Technologies in Industry, Springer, London.
38. Munkvold, B. (2003b), "Implementation of collaboration technologies: a review of the literature", in Munkvold, B. (Ed.), Implementing Collaboration Technologies in Industry, Springer, London.
39. Nonaka, I. (1994), "A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation", Organization Science, Vol. 5 No. 1, pp. 14-37.
40. Prahalad, C.K. and Hamel, G. (1990), "The core competence of the corporation", Harvard Business Review, Vol. 68 No. 3, pp. 79-91.
41. Prasad, K. and Akhilesh, K. (2002), "Global virtual teams: what impacts their design and performance", Team Performance Management, Vol. 8 Nos 5/6, pp. 102-12.
42. Rolf, B. and Magnusson, C. (2002), "Developing the art of argumentation. A software approach", Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Argumentation, Amsterdam.
43. Selvin, A. (2003), "Fostering collective intelligence: helping groups use visualized argumentation", in Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S. and Carr, C. (Eds), Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Springer, London, pp. 137-63.
44. Shum, S., MacLean, A., Forder, J. and Hammond, N. (1993), "Summarising the evolution of design concepts within a design rationale framework", Adjunct Proceedings of InterCHI'93: ACM/IFIP Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Amsterdam, pp. 43-4.
45. Smolensky, P., Fox, B., King, R. and Lewis, C. (1987), "Computer-aided reasoned discourse, or how to argue with a computer", in Guindon, R. (Ed.), Cognitive Science and its Applications for Human-Computer Interaction, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 109-62.
46. Suthers, D. (2001), "Towards a systematic study of representational guidance for collaborative learning discourse", Journal of Universal Computer Sciences, Vol. 7, pp. 254-77.
47. Traunmueller, R. and Wimmer, M. (2003), "E-Government at a decisive moment: sketching a roadmap to excellence", Proceedings of eGov-2003 International Conference: From E-Government to E-Governance, 2739, Prague, 1-5 September.
48. Traunmueller, R. and Wimmer, M. (2004), "E-government: the challenges ahead", Proceedings of eGov-2004 International Conference, 3183, Zaragoza, 30 August-3 September.
49. Turban, E., King, D., Lee, J., Warkentin, M. and Chung, H. (2004), Electronic Commerce 2004: A Managerial Perspective, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
50. van Gelder, T. (2003), "Enhancing deliberation through computer supported argument visualization", in Kirschner, P., Buckingham Shum, S. and Carr, C. (Eds), Visualizing Argumentation: Software Tools for Collaborative and Educational Sense-Making, Springer, London, pp. 97-115.
51. van Gelder, T.J. and Bulka, A. (2000), ReasonAble (Version 1.1), The Reason Group, Melbourne, available at: www.goreason.com.
52. Wimmer, M. (2002), "A European perspective towards online one-stop government: the eGov project", Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, Vol. 1, pp. 92-103.