Pericardial reconstruction using an extracellular matrix implant correlates with reduced risk of postoperative atrial fibrillation in coronary artery bypass surgery patients

Heart Surgery Forum

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2010, Pages

  Boyd, W Douglas ^a   Johnson III, William E ^b   Sultan, Parvez K ^c   Deering, Thomas F ^d   Matheny, Robert G ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Mobile Infirmary Medical Center   (United States)

^c Trinity Medical Center   (United States)

^d PIEDMONT HEART INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e CorMatrix Cardiovascular ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS SURGERY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX IMPLANT; FEMALE; HEART ATRIUM FIBRILLATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERICARDIAL RECONSTRUCTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL RISK; WOUND CLOSURE; XENOGRAFT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERICARDIUM; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSTHESES AND IMPLANTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; TRANSPLANTATION, HETEROLOGOUS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 78049343465     PISSN: 10983511     EISSN: 15226662     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1532/HSF98.20091184     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alex J, Guvendik L. 2005. Evaluation of ventral cardiac denervation as a prophylaxis against atrial fibrillation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann Thorac Surg 79:517-20. (Pubitemid 40186549)
2. Aranki SF, Shaw DP, Adams DH, et al. 1996. Predictors of atrial fibrillation after coronary artery surgery. Current trends and impact on hospital resources. Circulation 94:390-7.
3. Auer J, Weber T, Berent R, Ng CK, Lamm G, Eber B. 2005. Risk factors of postoperative atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Card Surg 20:425-31.
4. Badylak SF, Freytes DO, Gilbert TW. 2008. Extracellular matrix as a biological scaffold material: structure and function. Acta Biomater 5:1-13.
5. Badylak SF, Kochupura PV, Cohen IS, et al. 2006. The use of extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for the partial replacement of functional myocardium. Cell Transplant 15(suppl 1):S29-40.
6. Biancari F, Mahar MA. 2010. Meta-analysis of randomized trials on the efficacy of posterior pericardiotomy in preventing atrial fibrillation after coronary bypass surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 139:1158-61.
7. Boos CJ, Anderson RA, Lip GY. 2006. Is atrial fibrillation an inflammatory disorder? Eur Heart J 27:136-49.
8. Creswell LL, Schuessler RB, Rosenbloom M, Cox JL. 1993. Hazards of postoperative atrial arrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg 56:539-49.
9. Echahidi N, Pibarot P, O'Hara G, Mathieu P. 2008. Mechanisms, prevention, and treatment of atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol 51:793-801. (Pubitemid 351255619)
10. Gerdisch MW, Akinwande AO, Matheny RG. 2009. Extracellular matrix for in-vivo tissue engineered valve repair and reconstruction. Poster presented at: Fifth Biennial Meeting of the Society for Heart Valve Disease; June 27-30, 2009; Berlin, Germany.
11. Hamilton DR, Dani RS, Semlacher RA, Smith ER, Kieser TM, Tyberg JV. 1994. Right atrial and right ventricular transmural pressures in dogs and humans. Effects of the pericardium. Circulation 90:2492-500.
12. Jongnarangsin K, Oral H. 2009. Postoperative atrial fibrillation. Cardiol Clin 27:69-78, viii.
13. Kalus JS, Caron MF, White CM, et al. 2004. Impact of fluid balance on incidence of atrial fibrillation after cardiothoracic surgery. Am J Cardiol 94:1423-5.
14. Kroeker CA, Shrive NG, Belenkie I, Tyberg JV. 2003. Pericardium modulates left and right ventricular stroke volumes to compensate for sudden changes in atrial volume. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 284:H2247-54.
15. Maisel WH, Rawn JD, Stevenson WG. 2001. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Ann Intern Med 135:1061-73.
16. Mathew JP, Fontes ML, Tudor IC, et al, for the Investigators of the Ischemia Research and Education Foundation and the Multicenter Study of Perioperative Ischemia Research Group. 2004. A multicenter risk index for atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. JAMA 291:1720-9.
17. Mattson SE, Ganz LI. 2000. Understanding the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation from clinical observations. In: Steinberg JS, ed. Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Norwell, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers. p 19-37.
18. Mayson SE, Greenspon AJ, Adams S, et al. 2007. The changing face of postoperative atrial fibrillation prevention: a review of current medical therapy. Cardiol Rev 15:231-41. (Pubitemid 47282032)
19. Ninio DM, Saint DA. 2006. Passive pericardial constraint protects against stretch-induced vulnerability to atrial fibrillation in rabbits. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 291:H2547-9.
20. Palmer EM, Beilfuss BA, Nagai T, Semnani RT, Badylak SF, van Seventer GA. 2002. Human helper T cell activation and differentiation is suppressed by porcine small intestinal submucosa. Tissue Eng 8:893-900. (Pubitemid 35239767)
21. Speir AM, Kasirajan V, Barnett SD, Fonner E Jr. 2009. Additive costs of postoperative complications for isolated coronary artery bypass grafting patients in Virginia. Ann Thorac Surg 88:40-5; discussion 45-6.
22. Steinberg JS, Zelenkofske S, Wong SC, Gelernt M, Sciacca R, Menchavez E. 1993. Value of the P-wave signal-averaged ECG for predicting atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery. Circulation 88:2618-22. (Pubitemid 23360186)