EASY, evaluation of parsers of French: What are the results?

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2480-2486

  Paroubek, P ^a   Robba, I ^a   Vilnat, A ^a   Ayache, C ^b  

^a UFR 919 Laboratoire d'Informatique Pour la Mécanique et les Sciences de l'Ingénieur   (France)

^b ELDA   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; DEPENDENCY RELATION; EVALUATION MEASURES; SYNTACTIC PARSERS;

SYNTACTICS;

EID: 78049335049     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (11)

1. L. Allison, C. S. Wallace, and C. N. Yee. 1990. When is a string like a string? In Proceedings of International Symposium on Artificial Intelligence in Mathematics (AIM), Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, January.
2. S. Chaudiron and J. Mariani. 2006. Techno-langue: The french national initiative for human language technologies (hlt). In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Language Ressources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 767-772, Genoa, Italy, may.
3. Jonathan G Fiscus. 1997. A post-processing system to yield reduced word error rates: recognizer output voting error reduction (rover). In In proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, pages 347-357, Santa Barbara, CA.
4. L. Hirschman. 1998. Language understanding evaluations: lessons learned from muc and atis. In Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), Granada, Spain.
5. J. Lööf, C. Gollan, S. Hahn, G. Heigold, B. Hoffmeister, C. Plahl, D. Rybach, R. Schlüter, and H. Ney. 2007. The rwth 2007 tc-star evaluation system for european english and spanish. In In proceedings of the Interspeech Conference, pages 2145-2148.
6. M. Marcus, B. Santorini, and M. Marcinkiewciz. 1993. Building a large annotated corpus of english: The penn treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19:313-330.
7. Patrick Paroubek, Isabelle Robba, Anne Vilnat, and Christelle Ayache. 2006. Data, annotations and measures in EASY - the evaluation campaign for parsers of French. In ELRA, editor, In proceedings of the fifth international conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2006), pages 315-320, Genoa, Italy, May. ELRA.
8. Patrick Paroubek. 2000. Language resources as by-product of evaluation: the multitag example. In In proceedings of the Second International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC2000), volume 1, pages 151-154.
9. G. Sampson. 1995. English for the Computer: The Susanne Corpus and Analytic Scheme. Oxford University Press, USA.
10. Holger Schwenk and Jean-Luc Gauvain. 2000. Improved rover using language model information. In In proceedings of the ISCA ITRW Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition: Challenges for the new Millenium, pages 47-52, Paris, September.
11. A. Vilnat, P. Paroubek, L. Monceaux, I. Robba, V. Gendner, G. Illouz, and M. Jardino. 2004. The ongoing evaluation campaign of syntactic parsing of french: Easy. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC), pages 2023-2026, Lisboa, Portugal.