Perspectives on pap test follow-up care among rural appalachian women

Women and Health

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 580-597

  Schoenberg, Nancy ^a   Baltisberger, Julie ^b   Bardach, Shoshana ^a   Dignan, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

^b EASTERN KENTUCKY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Abnormal findings; Cancer of the cervix; Cancer screenings; Health services; Public health

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; RURAL POPULATION; UNITED STATES; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR; VAGINA SMEAR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; KENTUCKY; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PREGNANCY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; RURAL POPULATION; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; VAGINAL SMEARS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 78049322699     PISSN: 03630242     EISSN: 15410331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03630242.2010.516702     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ACS. 2007. Cancer facts and figures 2007. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society.
2. Appalachian Regional Commission. 2006. Demographic and health information. Retrieved March 10, 2008, from http://www.arc.gov/index.do?nodeId=56
3. Bastani, R., K. R. Yabroff, R. E. Myers, and B. Glenn. 2004. Interventions to improve follow-up of abnormal findings in cancer screening. Cancer 101:1188-1200.
4. Battaglia, T. A., C. M. Santana, S. Bak, M. Gokhale, T. L. Lash, A. S. Ash, et al. 2010. Predictors of timely follow-up after abnormal cancer screening among women seeking care at urban community health centers. Cancer 116:913-921.
5. Beaver, P. D. 1986. Rural community in the Appalachian South. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
6. Benard, V. B., H. W. Lawson, C. R. Eheman, C. Anderson, and W. Helsel. 2005. Adherence to guidelines for follow-up of low-grade cytologic abnormalities among medically underserved women. Obstet & Gynecol 105:1323-8.
7. Bowden, J., M. P. Shaul, and J. A. Bennett. 2004. The process of changing health risk behaviors: An Oregon rural clinic experience. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 16: 411-7.
8. Boyatzis, R. 1998. Transforming Qualitative Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Breitkopf, C. R., J. Catero, J. Jaccard, and A. B. Berenson. 2004. Psychological and sociocultural perspectives on follow-up of abnormal papanicolaou results. Obstet & Gynecol 104:1347-1354.
10. Campo, S., N. M. Askelson, T. Routsong, L. J. Graaf, M. Losch, and H. Smith. 2008. The green acres effect: The need for a new colorectal cancer screening campaign tailored to rural audiences. Health Edu & Behav 35:749-762.
11. Christopher, S., A. L. Gidley, B. Letiecq, A. Smith, and A. K. McCormick. 2008. A cervical cancer community-based participatory research project in a Native American community. Health Edu & Behav 35:821-834.
12. Eggleston, K. S., A. L. Coker, I. P. Das, S. T. Cordray, and K. J. Luchok. 2007. Understanding barriers for adherence to follow-up care for abnormal pap tests. J Women's Health 16:311-330.
13. Eggleston, K. S., A. L. Coker, K. J. Luchok, and T. E. Meyer. 2007. Adherence to recommendations for follow-up to abnormal pap tests. Obstet & Gynecol 109:1332-1341.
14. Ell, K., B. Vourlekis, L. Muderspach, J. Nissly, D. Padgett, D. Pineda, et al. 2002. Abnormal cervical screen follow-up among low-income Latinas: Project SAFe. J Women's Health & Gender Based Med 11:639-651.
15. Engelman, K., D. L. Perpich, S. L. Peterson, M. A. Hall, E. F. Ellerbeck, and A. L. Stanton. 2005. Cancer information needs in rural areas. J Health Commun 10:199-208.
16. English, K. C., J. Fairbanks, C. E. Finster, A. Rafelito, J. Luna, and M. Kennedy. 2008. A socioecological approach to improving mammography rates in a tribal community. Health Edu & Behav 35:396-409.
17. Fisher, J. W., and S. I. Brundage. 2009. The challenge of eliminating cervical cancer in the United States: A story of politics, prudishness, and prevention. Women & Health 49:246-261.
18. Fox, P., P. Arnsberger, and X. Zhang. 1997. An examination of differential follow-up rates in cervical cancer screening. J Commun Health 22:199-209.
19. Freeman, H., and B. K. Wingrove. 2005. Excess cervical cancer mortality: A marker for low access to health care in poor communities. Rockville, MD: National Cancer Institute, Center to Reduce Cancer Health Disparities.
20. Goldman, R. E., E. Barbeau, M. K. Hunt, D. Acevedo-Garcia, K. M. Emmons, J. Gagne, et al. 2008. Perceptions of health promotion and cancer prevention among adults in working-class occupations and neighborhoods. Health Edu & Behav 35:777-790.
21. Gravitt, P. E., and R. Jamshidi. 2005. Diagnosis and management of oncogenic cervical human papillomavirus infection. Infect Dis Clin North America 19:439-458.
22. Hopenhayn, C., H. Bush, A. Christian, and B. J. Shelton. 2005. Comparative analysis of invasive cervical cancer incidence rates in three Appalachian states. Prev Med 41:859-864.
23. Kahn, J. A., E. Goodman, B. Huang, G. B. Slap, and S. J. Emans. 2003. Predictors of papanicolaou smear return in a hospital-based adolescent and young adult clinic. Obstet & Gynecol 101:490-9.
24. Khanna, N., and M. D. Phillips. 2001. Adherence to care plan in women with abnormal papanicolaou smears: A review of barriers and interventions. J Am Board Fam Pract 14:123-30.
25. Leyden, W. A., M. M. Manos, A. M. Geiger, S. Weinmann, J. Mouchawar, K. Bischoff, et al. 2005. Cervical cancer in women with comprehensive health care access: Attributable factors in the screening process. J Natl Cancer Inst 97:675-83.
26. Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
27. Marcus, A. C., & L. A. Crane. 1998. A review of cervical cancer screening intervention research: Implications for public health programs and future research. Prev Med 27:13-31.
28. McKee, M. D. 1997. Improving the follow-up of patients with abnormal papanicolaou smear results. Arch Fam Med 6:574-7.
29. McKee, M. D., C. Schechter, W. Burton, and M. Mulvihill. 2001. Predictors of followup of atypical and ASCUS papanicolaou test results in a high-risk population. J Fam Pract 50:609.
30. Melnikow, J., B. K. S. Chan, and G. K. Stewart. 1999. Do follow-up recommendations for abnormal papanicolaou smears influence patient adherence? Arch Fam Med 8:510-4.
31. National Cancer Institute. 2006. State cancer profiles. Retrieved May 1, 2006, from http://statecancerprofiles.cancer.gov/cgi-bin/deathrates/deathrates.
32. National Cancer Institute. 2009. Cervical cancer. Retrieved January 22, 2010, from http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/types/cervical/
33. Nelson, K., A. Geiger, and C. Mangione. 2002. Effect of health beliefs on delays in care for abnormal cervical cytology in a multiethnic population. J Gen Intern Med 17:709-716.
34. Paskett, E. D., and B. K. Rimer. 1995. Psychosocial effects of abnormal pap tests and mammograms: A review. J Women's Health 4:73-82.
35. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
36. Poon, E., J. Haas, A. Puopolo, T. Gandhi, E. Burdick, D. Bates, et al. 2004. Communication factors in the follow-up of abnormal mammograms. J Gen Intern Med 19:316-323.
37. Ries, L., M. Eisner, C. Kosary, B. Hankey, B. Miller, L. Clegg, et al. 2000. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2005. Retrieved May 10, 2008, from http://seer.cancer. gov/csr/1975_2005
38. Rimer, B., H. Meissner, N. Breen, J. Legler, and C. Coyne. 2001. Social and behavioral interventions to increase breast cancer screening. In Integrating behavioral and social science with public health, eds. N. Schneiderman, M. Speers, J. Silva, H. Tomes, and J. Gentry, pp. 177-202. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
39. Schoenberg, N. E., J. Hatcher, M. B. Dignan, B. Shelton, S. Wright, and K. F. Dollarhide. 2009. Faith Moves Mountains: An Appalachian cervical cancer prevention program. Am J Health Behav 33:627-38.
40. Schofield, M. J., R. Sansonfisher, S. Halpin, and S. Redman. 1994. Notification and follow-up of pap test results: Current practice and women's preferences. Prev Med 23:276-83.
41. Stewart, D. E., P. M. Buchegger, G. M. Lickrish, and S. Sierra. 1994. The effect of educational brochures on follow-up compliance in women with abnormal papanicolaou smears. Obstet & Gynecol 83:583-5.
42. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.